New PFT 3D animation depicts actual FDR values

Lyte Trip

Banned
L
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
1,992
Yes we know that the NTSB put out an animation that did not accurately depict the FDR.

Whether this was due to incompetence or done on purpose as disinformation we will never know.

But the FDR does not accurately depict a flight path that can be reconciled with the physical damage (or the witness accounts of course).

When descent and bank angles are taken into account it is 100% clear that the FDR had to have been faked (albeit badly) because it completely contradicts the physical damage AND the security video.

Watch new 3D animation here!
 
another round of dumb

Lyte Trip said:
Yes we know that the NTSB put out an animation that did not accurately depict the FDR.

Whether this was due to incompetence or done on purpose as disinformation we will never know.

But the FDR does not accurately depict a flight path that can be reconciled with the physical damage (or the witness accounts of course).

When descent and bank angles are taken into account it is 100% clear that the FDR had to have been faked (albeit badly) because it completely contradicts the physical damage AND the security video.

Watch new 3D animation here!
Click to expand...
JDX forgot the parking lot camera had a lens, like a fish eye lens, which distorted the view and made the plane look level. The lens made the whole world look funny. You guys are too funny. Manufacture evidence. Mess up the facts and put out false dumb stuff. JDX is not very smart, he does not know flying stuff and forensic are not his long suit. His pan down to the security camera has the perspective wrong and he does not show a good comparison because you would see how the lens bends and distorts the whole scene. The lens mistake alone makes this work doo doo.

2 thumbs down. This is as bad as the Pentacon junk.

The FDR did not have the data for the last seconds. The last data point for Radar Altimeter was 273 feet. Does not look like the FDR had data for the fantasy that Robert Balsamo's group is pushing now. Lyte, 273 feet means it was not at the Pentagon yet.

At least the flight path shows your stories are lies. And this video proves again, if you understand the lens, the plane seen on the poor lens of the parking lot camera was the right size for flight 77. Self debunking tripe from p4t. Outstanding.
 
Last edited:
Lyte,

Are you concluding that the FDR was faked because the animation shows it too high to hit the light poles, or faked because it completely blows your North of Citgo claim out of the water?
 
Lyte Trip said:
When descent and bank angles are taken into account it is 100% clear that the FDR had to have been faked (albeit badly) because it completely contradicts the physical damage AND the security video.
Click to expand...


And you see nothing illogical here?

Aren't the same people who planted that FDR the same people who "staged" the physical damage?
 
Lyte Trip said:
When descent and bank angles are taken into account it is 100% clear that the FDR had to have been faked (albeit badly) because it completely contradicts the physical damage AND the security video.
Click to expand...




I don’t believe you and your lack of credibility suggests that actually evaluating your claim will prove to be a total waste of time.
 
yes, I'm wondering the same thing as Mortimer. Are you prepared to admit that the Pentacon is wrong?
 
mortimer said:
Lyte,

Are you concluding that the FDR was faked because the animation shows it too high to hit the light poles, or faked because it completely blows your North of Citgo claim out of the water?
Click to expand...

The FDR is irreconcilable with the physical damage.

Clearly the plane did not fly where the FDR says it did because it does not match the physical damage.

Therefore the only conclusion is that the FDR is faked.

Of course this is 100% supported by the witnesses who place the plane far from the physical damage AND the FDR.
 
It also must be mentioned that the FDR "data" was leaked to PF911T by an anonymous "insider" and has not been released by PF911T for verification. So we're supposed to just take Robbie's word for it?
 
Lyte Trip said:
[The conclusion that the FDR is faked] is 100% supported by the witnesses who place the plane far from the physical damage AND the FDR.
Click to expand...




Yes, the theory that the flight data recorder is faked is by definition supported by those witnesses who place the plane far from the path suggested both by physical damage and the flight data recorder. What a terminally daft thing to point out.
 
mortimer said:
It also must be mentioned that the FDR "data" was leaked to PF911T by an anonymous "insider" and has not been released by PF911T for verification. So we're supposed to just take Robbie's word for it?
Click to expand...


Um no.

You would need to file an FOIA request and get the information to verify it yourself if you don't trust it.

You have done that right?
 
So Craig, you understand that the FDR and the physical damage can not be both faked?

Do you understand?
 
Par said:
Yes, the theory that the flight data recorder is faked is by definition supported by those witnesses who place the plane far from the path suggested both by physical damage and the flight data recorder. What a terminally daft thing to point out.
Click to expand...

Yes I agree that was a terminally daft question asked by Mortimer.
 
Pardalis said:
So Craig, you understand that the FDR and the physical damage can not be both faked?

Do you understand?
Click to expand...

You are incorrect.

The fact that the FDR was faked is evidence that the plane did not really hit the building and the physical damage was therefore simulated as well.

This happens to be supported by all the eyewitnesses and refuted by none.
 
Lyte is the new Robbie Bullhorn. Since Robbie cannot comeback here, and Lyte is listed as part of their group (Pentagon witness research I believe) Lyte has decided to come here to make announcements for him.

Peas in a truther pod.

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
Lyte Trip said:
The FDR is irreconcilable with the physical damage.
Click to expand...

Asserting it over and over doesn't make it true.

Every single attempt at demonstrating this by PFT has failed utterly.

PFT is now left rehashing the same tired debunked arguments and re-asserting their false propositions. Over and over. Proof ad nauseum.


The FDR data is 100% consistent with the physical damage. That is beyond question, in my mind. It requires a special kind of liar to be able to lie both to themselves and others about this rather incontrovertible fact.
 
Lyte;

the next time your guys suspect an oncoming false flag operation, please remind me to tell my handlers to make sure the FAKE FDR data matches the alleged path of the plane, and corresponds to the damage...see the stupid, moronic NWO who pulled off 9/11 were to dumb to put the corresponding data in the last time, and this resulted in investigooglers finding out...we can't have this happen again.

TAM:) (agent 1-2-D-B)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom