Entries
|
|
|
|
| |
(Link updated 5/18/09, now a Word doc instead of the former HTML page. - Myriad)
"I put this document together for several reasons:
1. To promote understanding of the facts about the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and to discourage relying on rumor and conjecture when searching for the "truth."
2. Because I believe that "Loose Change" is an influential introduction for many people to 9/11 conspiracy issues.
3. To encourage respect for the victims, living and dead, of the 9/11 attacks.
My comments and analysis are mostly restricted to the issues raised by the video. At the end of this document are links to websites with in-depth analyses of 9/11 conspiracy theories, as well as links to the "official" version of events and to other analyses by experts and laymen."
--Mark Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A 131 page written critique of the popular 9/11 conspiracy film, "9/11 Mysteries".
Available in .pdf and .doc formats from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A collection of documentary videos about 9/11 and the 9/11 truth movement from mainstream media sources, debunking videos and truther/debunker debates.
See also
Videos
|
7th December 2009
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mike J. Wilson: A short movie illustrating the final moments of American Airlines flight 77. Key points include lamp pole evidence, security cam view analysis, generator damage and actual photos.
Witness new video and photos never seen before until just recently.
YouTube video
Mike J. Wilson's 9/11 Report
|
13th February 2007
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Whatever you believe about 9/11, the spreading of false claims helps no-one, and we’d like to play a small part in revealing some of them. We’re not about debunking entire conspiracies, then, but will use this site to zoom in on what we think are the more dubious stories, revealing the misquotes, the distortions, the inaccuracies that are so common online."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An expose of Richard Gage and his 9/11 group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
|
|
|
3rd February 2008
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.
|
8th December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PDF version of the 9/11 Commission's Report
THE 9/11
COMMISSION
REPORT
Final Report of the
National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks Upon the United States
official government edition
|
27th November 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provides articles (Wikipedia-style), information and resources relating to the 9/11 attacks, along with addressing common myths and theories.
http://debunk911myths.org
|
14th October 2008
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy theories and Controlled Demolition Myths
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our buddy Stephen Lemons, who wrote a terrific profile of Screw Loose Change gathered a ton more information on the 9-11 crackpots than could fit in his cover story, and is releasing on his Phoenix New Times blog, the Feathered Bastard. Not all of his posts are 9-11 related, and there is some strong language, but he's a fine writer with a keen and piercing wit.
See also
Conspiracy Theory - Useful Links
|
15th August 2007
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Firehouse Magazine Reports
WTC: This Is Their Story
From the April 2002 Firehouse Magazine
|
8th December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Brief rebuttals of the common Conspiracy Theories about 9/11, with links to more detailed information (from this forum and elsewhere). In four sections:
1. The WTC
2. The Pentagon
3. Flight 93
4. The Hijackers.
Compiled by JREF Forum Member Ref.
A good place to start.
|
9th March 2007
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"The purpose of this document is to provide a rebuttal to the most common theories raised by 9/11 Deniers in either verbal debates or message boards. Simply refer any 9/11 Denier spammers to this page in order for them to properly shut up."
--Mark Iradian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This paper is written to demonstrate that those who believe that the World Trade Centre was destroyed by controlled demolition, rather than the impact of the planes, are mistaken. While I sympathise with the overall aims of protesting against US and UK foreign policy, I don't believe that US officials took part in a conspiracy to murder thousands of their fellow-citizens. I believe that the truth is in fact more alarming: US and UK foreign policy is based on ignorance, not malice. But I don't believe in fighting ignorance with ignorance. However well-intentioned, the demolition theories will not achieve their goals because they are based on an ignorance of good science.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An astounding collection of links and original work representing the best of the best--a mountain of wheat culled from a sea of chaff, organized into an easy-to-navigate buffet of tasty debunking goodness.
AWE-inspiring work!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Questions & Answers
Implosionworld.com has received numerous inquiries from around the world requesting information and commentary relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, and specifically the felling of the World Trade Center towers. We have been contacted by media outlets, structural engineers, schoolteachers, conspiracy theorists and many others who are searching for answers and some “perspective” regarding these significant events that have evoked deep emotions and undoubtedly changed our world forever. The editors of implosionworld.com have created this page to answer a few of the most frequently asked questions that fall within our area of knowledge and expertise. But first we’d like to be clear in stating that any conversation relating to “implosions” and what causes structures to fail is undertaken with reverence and respect to those who perished as a result of this event. As many of our frequent web visitors are aware, Implosionworld.com’s offices are located close to New York City, and several of our employees were personally touched by this tragedy. Our thoughts and prayers remain with the families of those lost and injured, and our intent here is to help foster a constructive base of knowledge and understanding through education, while dispelling false rumors related to the attack.
|
8th December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Loose Change is a video that examines the attacks of September 11, written and narrated by Dylan Avery. Originally fiction, Avery decided to present it as a documentary after further research. The video received attention on the internet, and a second edition was produced which contained additional information but omitted some information from the first video. A recut of the second edition was later produced, with minor changes and corrections. This page will address issues presented in all of the videos, which are freely available online."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thomas Eager and Christopher Musso
"The collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers on September 11, 2001, was as sudden as it was dramatic; the complete destruction of such massive buildings shocked nearly everyone. Immediately afterward and even today, there is widespread speculation that the buildings were structurally deficient, that the steel columns melted, or that the fire suppression equipment failed to operate. In order to separate the fact from the fiction, we have attempted to quantify various details of the collapse."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A step-by-step critique of Loose Change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although this site has been out for a while, it does look like it was updated late last year. There are several pages dealing with the physics behind the claims, including the really whacky ones such as "dustification".
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PM examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
Published in the March, 2005 issue.
|
8th December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Over three hours total, 21 YouTube videos in all, investigating Richard Gage's 9/11 controlled demolition assertions category by category. Hosted and produced by Chris Mohr, who debated Richard Gage in Boulder CO on March 6 2011. Easy for laypeople to understand, put together with the help of metallurgists, chemists, engineers, 9/11 FDNY first responders, foundry workers, physicists etc., abundant visual aids, no acrimony. Here are links to the first 8 videos. Easy keywords: Richard Gage, Blueprint for Truth, Rebuttal, Debunked, 9/11.
Here are links to the introduction and parts 1-6 of my YouTube Gage rebuttals. This is 1/3 of the total of what will soon be available:
intro http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC3JgWkNNIQ
part 1 how collapses initiated http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-WQdmpdM_g
part 2 Richard's ten reasons for natural collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If5C8YiXHhE
part 3 history of fire collapses http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsjfSG69Pik
part 4 symmetrical/freefall http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsjfSG69Pik
part 5 lateral ejection of steel and squibs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2538YN1l1nA
part 6 pulverized concrete and steel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD0zg1OwBSo
See also
Conspiracy Theory - Useful Links
Education Resources
Science and Medical
Videos
|
6th July 2011
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One month after the attack on the World Trade Center, M.I.T. structural engineers offer their take on how and why the towers came down.
by Steven Ashley
|
8th December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A critique of the documentary 9/11 Mysteries.
|
18th January 2007
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using the spirit and style of Screw Loose Change, Screw 9/11 Mysteries is an extensive debunking video ripping through the numerous faults and accusations of 9/11 Mysteries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a counter-video of the famous "Loose Change 2nd Edition". Using their own video and words, "Screw Loose Change" debunks the theories and statements made in Loose Change 2nd Edition.
|
16th November 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A blog dedicated to exposing the lies, distortions and myths in the movie Loose Change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"There are likely a number of forums out there that serve as good forums to take a close look at the facts and actually discuss the issue, and I encourage you to visit those. What I offer here is an analysis of the events without any pointless mud-slinging or second-grade name-calling tactics."
--911debunker
|
|
|
29th November 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This site contains exhibits filed in the Moussaoui trial, for the news media. Others wishing to make these documents available on a mirror for the general public should contact gleslie [at] rcfp.org . Members of the news media should submit their email addresses to gleslie [at] rcfp.org if they would like to receive an email message when new items are available. Please include your media affiliation in the message.
Please note that the "introduced" dates is incomplete for much of the evidence from Phase I of the trial, either because parties did not supply it or provided only a date the evidence was admitted.
The Reporters Committee is managing this website on behalf of the news media as a public service, as called for in the Fourth Circuit decision in U.S. v. Moussaoui. If you'd like to know more about the Reporters Committee or contribute to defraying our costs for making the exhibits available, click here.
|
8th December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't trust everything on Wikipedia, but a number of them are designated as featured articles, which means they have been screened for quality and are among the best on Wikipedia.
The September 11 attacks portal page on Wikipedia is a guide to Wikipedia content relating to the 9/11 attacks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:...ber_11_attacks
|
23rd September 2007
|
|
|
|
This is a pitiful example of desperate people tr