All things Trump + Russia Part 4
 

So much for the argument that the majority of the country wanted Trump, eh?

Your idol doesn't agree:
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/...ors-nationwide
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...college-244637

And maybe some changes are coming:
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/

That wasn’t my argument.

That might be a clue he isn’t my idol? Lol

"[...]the country is deeply red. That’s because not very many like democrats or the left."

I just read on CNN that Trump won the Nobel Peace prize.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/05/24/p...rea/index.html

Thank you for showing my argument wasn’t a majority wanted Trump.

Here's an on topic post.

MH17 Missile Owned By Russian Brigade, Investigators Say.

So where is Mr. Tough Guy on this? The Orange Menace?

Oh yeah. Putin.

It's so weird that these completely innocent people keep lying their interactions with Russia. You'd almost think they had something to hide.

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it is definitely not collusion.
Trust me.
No collusion.

Look, just because Trump received large amounts of funding for his business dealings from Russia, publically asked the Russians to hack into American computers, had people on his campaign send email about how excited they were to potentially be getting dirt on Clinton from Russians, had members of his team meet with Russian agents during the campaign, had several people involved with his administration lie about Russian contacts during various investigations, fired one of the key people who was looking into possible influence by Russia, has made no effort to prevent Russian interference into future American elections, and had his personal lawyer meet with a Russian Oligarch with ties to Putin after the election does not mean that there is a reason to be suspicious that Trump might be colluding with the Russians.

After all, that sort of thing can happen to anybody.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/sta...86031914831873

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/sta...96362372374528

Well this says it was during the campaign: Business Insider: The FBI has obtained wiretaps of a Putin ally tied to the NRA who met with Trump Jr. during the campaign

https://twitter.com/politico/status/1000878700819337217

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/sta...89553954267136

Article linked in first tweet, thread continues after second.

The irony is exquisite. A Republican fundraiser, Trump insider, whining about hacked emails being used for character assassination.

And then putting a cherry on top by complaining about the involvement of foreign governments.

"...our recollection keeps changing..."

Good grief.

In other words "I can't remember the lies I told last time........"

Wait a sec... I thought trump bragged about how good his memory is.

Sent from my LG-K121 using Tapatalk

Yep, a GMOAT, which is why it's so difficult for him to remember - because if he had a less perfect memory, he'd only remember the last version he said :boggled:

On the one hand, goof grief is right!

On the other hand, as skeptics do we not often point out the malleability of human memory? Recollections do in fact change. So on its face the statement isn’t wrong, per sé.

Of course, in this case it is almost certainly “motivated change” - IOW, changing and fabricating stories as they go along to fit a desired narrative. Or “lying” in the common vernacular!

Really? You're going to waste our time with this irrelevant bit of unrelated neurobiology? :rolleyes:

If you think I’m wasting your time, there is a very simple remedy.

Given the number of things they denied happened and then had to admit did happen, this seems like an understatement.

I think the second paragraph in his post provides some context to what he intended to say.!

I understand that. But the fact we all have false memories about the past has absolutely nothing to do with the situation we are discussing and it was an absurdly pedantic post.

Well, this is fun: https://twitter.com/christinawilkie/...22640118304768

"Of course, in this case it is almost certainly “motivated change” - IOW, changing and fabricating stories as they go along to fit a desired narrative. Or “lying” in the common vernacular!"

Nothing suspicious about that! Nothing at all!

More details.

The only reason I can see for this guy running when asked questions about connections to Trump is tax evasion and money laundering, just like Manafort. It's almost a sure bet Trump has been laundering money and evading taxes himself and possibly the rest of the Trump family too.

Well, I'm pretty sure Barron wasn't doing any money laundering, so you can't say it was the ENTIRE trump family.

I wonder if there is some sort of "right of passage" for members of the Trump family, kind of like a Bar Mitzva. "Congratulations. You laundered your first million. You are now a man!"

That was simply a ridiculous article, the left will try anything, even people benefitting from peace is somehow Trump colluding with Russia and paybacks. Lol

I guess Putin's latest check cleared.....

He needs a friend to go to the party with him. :p

Or they might just decide to have their own party.

Alt-G2?

They need to do an Alt-F4.