Quote:
|
What if it was two pieces?
|
Quote:
Answer the question. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dave |
People always rationalize. Even Christians, who put their faith in front of the reason, do rationalize. They do believe because something happened to them. They will explain it in length. It's never 'I believe, because I believe'.
Same with these woo fighters. Sure there are some which are clearly doing it for profit and do not actually believe a word of it. But lots of them do actually believe. And they will use formulas and models. They will use all tools of the science .. except skepticism. Add Dunning-Kruger effect to the mix, and these people are bound to happen. Everybody is going through the phase of overestimating his knowledge. It's just a matter of how fast he will realize his error. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No you couldn’t, because “solid” is a adjective. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dave |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dave |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Newton's 3rd law is universal. Or are you suggesting that hundreds of satellites (which have manoeuvring thrusters) don't work ? Or that we never landed on the moon ? (the Apollo missions made multiple mid-range manoeuvres using rockets). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That is clearly a variation of this: Quote:
|
Quote:
This rather suggests that he thinks it’s a hoax: Quote:
Unless, I suppose, he claims that space flight has been using some other form of propulsion. |
Quote:
|
You tell 'em, Gingervytes!
No, b'god, I'll tell 'em! I'm a handloader. If I load a rifle cartidge with a light bullet and fire it off, it kicks. And if I load a cartridge with a heavier bullet & the same amount of powder & then shoot, IT KICKS HARDER! Let's see how you answer that, skeptics. & if I shoot over ocean water, the bullet lands in it just like any other NASTA rocket. |
Quote:
Consider a simple experiment. You have a container that has one and only one opening and you put some mass that has pressure. The pressure is greater than the fluid around the container and is contained in every direction by the container with the exception of the opening. The pressure F= ma will exert that force in all directions except the opening has no confinement. The resulting net force in the opposite direction of that opening will result in the container being accelerated in the opposite direction, regardless of what is around the container. As Jay sts60 have pointed out to you have failed to present a case that disproves Newton. Your video does not. |
Quote:
Dave |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But the OP is basically saying you can't do a push up against the air, I take it. You need resistance in the form of the ground, or in the case of a rocket, matter for the gas to push against. How to explain within that self imposed parameter that resistance is not needed? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2015-24, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.