Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3
I find it interesting... Esteban Sarmiento talks of how dermal ridges
and scars etc can be faked. Just skip Chilcutt and go to 2:03 in the video. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M15H9WGzWbw And if you're really bored watch this. Seven parts,,, if you can take the torture. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GHK2O6...eature=related |
Logic,
Great image! :clap: m |
JCR, the ngc program is heavily biased. It is a travesty to the serious researchers. Why didnt it present the freeman and klamath footage? Why not the hair morphology? The gaussian curve?
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZDm...eature=related Quote:
|
LMAO... I suffered through all 7
|
Quote:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=RKfuZepS68A And this isn't a travesty to researchers ? |
Jc, a man trying to imitate something is a travesty? Come on, ask anyone to do that, and all of them sound like complete morons, yet that doesnt mean there wrong.
|
Quote:
|
Kitz, thats not the point. The point is that people are no more credible or less credible when they imitate a sound
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
in that department anyways. |
Rockin, the hairs are similiar to human, except that all 11 lack medullas, are thicker, cut, tapered ends.
|
Imitating sounds is just that...
And credibility is another creature altogether. |
Quote:
In other words - the lack of a medulla does not rule out the hairs being human. What to heck does "thicker" mean? Are you referring to the Maximum Shaft Diameter? Is that measurement outside of known human hair? If so - by how much? (Please cite reference) Ummm..."cut". Please explain what you meant by that. Tapered ends...do you mean the distal hair tip is tapered? Human hair can have naturally occurring taper. Is it a Natural Taper or a Rounded Taper? |
Rockin, 11 different hairs have features that are different from human hair
http://bfro.net/images/whatis/figure...%20caption.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you read it? Fahrenbach's work with alleged sasquatch hair is a complete joke. |
Sasquatch hair is cut and has different cortex color
|
Quote:
|
GT, i mean that the hairs are cut, which isnt found in human hair
Professor Stephen I Rosen of the University of Maryland has identified its hair as that of a previously unknown primate–and he has hair on file for most of the living primates of the world. |
Quote:
Professor Stephen I Rosen of the University of Maryland has identified its hair as that of a previously unknown primate–and he has hair on file for most of the living primates of the world. |
Quote:
|
Let's have the full quote, makaya. Why did you write it as if it were your own words?
Quote:
|
Also here:
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/coon.htm Quote:
|
Well, Jack is still holding at 5' 10" +/- on Patty's height.
|
Apparently even rare elusive animal are getting caught on Camera. Not bigfoot....
venomous mamal studied (I know the argument on the quantum bigfoot (both elusive and easily found at the same time) have been beaten to death, but I thought of the finding might interrest some people here on its own value). |
Aep, tell me, how many videos do we have of a blue bear? Yes, im bringing it up again.
|
Quote:
|
Long, even wolverines are video taped tons of times. However, the blue bear has never been video taped, and if it were, it would be online
|
Quote:
So, you cant say it was never filmed anymore than you can say you know it has ( unless you have seen a film of one) The point is moot however because the BB is known to exist for over a century so the ABILITY to find and film one ( if desired) is readily available for anyone with the resources to do so. Thats what really matters. I dont follow your reasoning. Are you saying that because a known animal has not been filmed ( which is really a choice to NOT film it since it can be filmed) that in some way shores up the argument thats theres ZERO reliable "film" of BF especially since BF gets seen hundreds of times a year with a good bit of camera traps and people physically looking for him? ) and everyone else in the woods doing other things?) |
Quote:
This may not be true. There may be video of blue bears that is not online. |
Quote:
"If anything that exists cannot be found as a video online, therefore anything we can imagine which also cannot be found as a video online can safely be assumed to exist." Is that the point being made? |
No hitch. Bad case by me. Im still hellbent on the lack of continous bodies of the blue bear. This goes more than an analogy, its sad we have trouble finding them
|
First you need to define which species of Blue Bear. These bears are not quite as elusive as bigfoot, which is everywhere yet nowhere. Who needs video/film when you have one in a zoo?
m Ursus arctos pruinosus aka Blue Bear Got this one in a zoo. http://www.internationalskeptics.com...8e801bc562.jpg Ursus americanus emmonsii aka Blue Bear/Glacier Bear/Spirit Bear This species is not quite as rare http://www.internationalskeptics.com...8e85ff3c91.jpg http://www.internationalskeptics.com...8e87a91d8e.jpg http://www.internationalskeptics.com...8e8ea6c31d.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Enough with the blue bears! It's raining blue bears: Quote:
|
Quote:
:hit: Hello? Hello?? I showed you two separate bears in zoos in Japan. PEOPLE VIDEOTAPE THEM DAILY. |
Quote:
But, hey, pay me the travel to the japan zoo where there is one, and I deliver you tons over tons of blue bear video. Or ask kitakaze to film it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2015-24, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.