International Skeptics Forum

International Skeptics Forum (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumindex.php)
-   Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=91)
-   -   Qanon Conspiracy theories (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=327121)

SuburbanTurkey 8th November 2018 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12496073)
Regarding Qanon,

A coupla months back Q wrote a fair amount on how Sessions would go away after doing his part and how Trey Gowdy would replace him after Jan 1. Q referred to Gowdy's contentious dealings with Clintons & Co, and his history of being a tough prosecutor.

I will look for those Q posts for ya, as I know y'all crave and need more info.

Prophetic. Who else but Q could have known that Trump wanted Sessions gone?

Bubba 8th November 2018 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sts60 (Post 12496049)
Thanks for the thread guidance. In that spirit:



I didn’t read it.


Good post !

Bubba 8th November 2018 10:37 AM

You're certain of this?

Another member at msm info level, I take it?

Nice town, Boston. All that higher education and history

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey (Post 12496075)
Prophetic. Who else but Q could have known that Trump wanted Sessions gone?


SuburbanTurkey 8th November 2018 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12496082)
You're certain of this?

Another member at msm info level, I take it?

Nice town, Boston. All that higher education and history

Not sure what most of that means, but ok.

Trump has been loudly complaining about Sessions since he recused himself. Removal was a question of when, not if.

carlitos 8th November 2018 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12496025)
Now this...

This one knows that 'media blackout' refers specifically to the major/mainstream media not covering the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time ie a decades long msm blackout on Bberg. Hence, this one now is seen playing word games. Why?

One way to ensure that folks know what you mean is to write, clearly and concisely, exactly what you mean. Unless you're just playing games, like this Q whatever is doing.



Quote:

Various Characteristics Of Passive Aggressive Communication

Ambiguity is almost always part of the passive behavior or talk, because, by being ambiguous, the person can deny any kind of emotional upset. The message can usually be interpreted as benign, or indicating anger and hostility, and that's always the ambiguity.

Bubba 8th November 2018 11:22 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey (Post 12496093)
Not sure what most of that means, but ok.


It means your #361 sounds like a CNN etc info level outlook.



Quote:

Trump has been loudly complaining about Sessions since he recused himself. Removal was a question of when, not if.



You assume Trump's histrionics about Sessions are sincere? Maybe his complaining about Sessions is not so sincere ie maybe it is part of a plan.

Axxman300 8th November 2018 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12496142)
You assume Trump's histrionics about Sessions are sincere? Maybe his complaining about Sessions is not so sincere ie maybe it is part of a plan.

1. The leaks about Trump's displeasure of Sessions have been consistent for the past 18 months.

2. Trump has no plan.

Whip 8th November 2018 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12496025)
Now this...

This one knows that 'media blackout' refers specifically to the major/mainstream media not covering the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time ie a decades long msm blackout on Bberg. Hence, this one now is seen playing word games. Why?

what is 'this one'? and why didn't you attribute the alleged quote to whoever wrote it?

carlitos 8th November 2018 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whip (Post 12496184)
what is 'this one'? and why didn't you attribute the alleged quote to whoever wrote it?

See my quote above for an explanation. Intentionally vague speech is a feature of a certain kind of communication. The sort who might also admire some rando on the internet typing fake jargony-sounding telegrams on chan boards.

Imhotep 8th November 2018 12:39 PM

Where are the conspiracy theories?

sts60 8th November 2018 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlitos (Post 12496211)
See my quote above for an explanation. Intentionally vague speech is a feature of a certain kind of communication. The sort who might also admire some rando on the internet typing fake jargony-sounding telegrams on chan boards.

And the sort who like to play passive-aggressive games and avoid taking responsibility for their claims, second- and third-hand as they are. QED (not you, carlitos).

Belz... 9th November 2018 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12496076)
Good post !

I think at this point the game is obvious.

Cosmic Yak 9th November 2018 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlitos (Post 12496101)
One way to ensure that folks know what you mean is to write, clearly and concisely, exactly what you mean. Unless you're just playing games, like this Q whatever is doing.

No, carlitos, constant backpedalling and shiftiness make you look good. Didn't you know that?

Cosmic Yak 9th November 2018 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Belz... (Post 12496947)
I think at this point the game is obvious.

Indeed.

"Ha! I got a reaction!"

Yes. It's an internet forum. That's what it's for, and that's why we're here.
malbec fancied himself as a puppet-master as well, and just as credibly.

sts60 9th November 2018 09:24 AM

I don’t think it’s conviction-free trolling, like with the late unlamented Anders. I think Bubba really believes, or wants to believe, a lot of the drivel he reposts. It’s just that (a) he doesn’t really understand how to support his secondhand claims, (b) he runs through a very predictable passive-aggressive state machine in each conspiracy thread, and (c) his source material is just crap, so he doesn’t really have much to work with in the first place.

Belz... 9th November 2018 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak (Post 12497018)
Indeed.

"Ha! I got a reaction!"

Yes. It's an internet forum. That's what it's for, and that's why we're here.
malbec fancied himself as a puppet-master as well, and just as credibly.

Yeah there's no prize here. The whole point of discussions is to get attention.

Bubba 9th November 2018 11:34 AM

Fortunately for us, we can maintain our position and say its mere coincidence should events unfold according to Qanon's various predictions. Whew.

Elagabalus 9th November 2018 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12495517)
from a Qanon board:

Where did POTUS campaign?<<SNIP>> This is going as planned. POTUS had a choice, help win the house, or guarantee what he needs, THE SENATE.

I can't help but notice that this is not a prediction at all and is simply after the fact made up drivel.

carlitos 9th November 2018 12:15 PM

Post-diction.

Bubba 9th November 2018 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak (Post 12495545)
I assume by all this that you are now admitting that there was no media blackout on Bilderberg, and that there have been journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time.

Progress then...


No progress seen on your end....
As if you didnt know the issue is major media's blackout. Pretending 'media' (in context) means major media ie mainstream, is specifically dishonest. Your word game.

Major media avoided covering Bberg and the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups until after Bberg got outed.


Do tell please, when did msm such as NY Times, CBS, BBC, ABC, NBC, PBS, Time, Magazine, Wash Post etc first inform their audiences of Bberg's decades of secret meetings? (not counting the 4 or or 5 fluffy gossipy items from 1950s-1960s.?

Oops, should I have said 'secretive' instead of secret? After all, some people knew about Bberg, right? No. Secret is the operative term here because the general public was not informed by msm until after Bberg got outed by whistleblowers ie 'alternative media' ie actual journalism. Stop pretending it is the same media.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak (Post 12492563)
As for your claim that the media isn't covering the meetings, a quick Google revealed articles from the following:
cnbc
The Daily Mail.
The Independent.
The Express.
Business Insider.
The Daily Telegraph.
The Guardian.
The Sun.
wikileaks
National Post.
Britannica.
The BBC.
The Daily Star,
Euro News.
The Catholic Herald.
And many, many more.

Not the most effective media blackout I've seen. :rolleyes:



Estulin published his book in 2007.
The BBC ran an article in 2004.
Try again.





Fail.

The question you seem to be avoiding is *when did they begin covering Bberg?*

What year, (meaning after the 1960 fluffy stuff)?

You dont know, or do you....? Or is it you dont wanna know or admit?


This question, and its correct answer (date) proves msm did not report on Bbrg and whistleblowers until after Bberg was outed. (probably was after Bberg let msm know it was time to report, and how to report).

Pretending 'media' (in this context) means major media ie mainstream, is like lying.

Will you be splitting more hairs, or telling us when msm began reporting?

Bubba 9th November 2018 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elagabalus (Post 12497421)
I can't help but notice that this is not a prediction at all and is simply after the fact made up drivel.


Quote:

Originally Posted by carlitos (Post 12497433)
Post-diction.



Since no one said it was a prediction, why say that?

..although there actually is a prediction (of sorts) in there:

Quote:

...Why did Trey GOWDY resign from his seat?... AG GOWDY won’t be stopped n if u have read up on him he has never lost as a prosecutor....He is not gonna tell the MSM that he is resigning to go fill the AG spot....

That was a Q fan's opinion posting.

Some months ago, Q said that Gowdy would resign from the senate in order to replace Sessions, all according to plan. The Q fans claim that this Gowdy thing (so far) is a 'proof' of Q's legitimacy, and that if Gowdy does replace Sessions, its like "close the hood already. Q is for real"


Should Gowdy replace Sessions, some of the more feisty Q fans will be telling skeptics stuff like 'You smug arrogant pieces of %@$#*& were wrong, so wrong.". Thank goodness we skeptics can always fall back on..."...its just another coincidence."

Bubba 9th November 2018 03:41 PM

Quote:

Cosmic Yak said:

Estulin published his book in 2007.
The BBC ran an article in 2004.
Try again.
Cosmic Yak went to google and came back thinking he had a gotcha. He was wrong. Again.

In what year did people paying attention first learn of Bilderberg from Estulin before his book was published?

In this context Estulin's book publication is irrelevant......the issue at hand is about the date people paying attention first got wind of Bberg, versus the date when msm informed the general public of Bberg's existence.

How many years separated those two events ?

Try finding that on google.

Axxman300 9th November 2018 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12497455)
No progress seen on your end....
As if you didnt know the issue is major media's blackout. Pretending 'media' (in context) means major media ie mainstream, is specifically dishonest. Your word game.

Major media avoided covering Bberg and the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups until after Bberg got outed.


Do tell please, when did msm such as NY Times, CBS, BBC, ABC, NBC, PBS, Time, Magazine, Wash Post etc first inform their audiences of Bberg's decades of secret meetings? (not counting the 4 or or 5 fluffy gossipy items from 1950s-1960s.?

Oops, should I have said 'secretive' instead of secret? After all, some people knew about Bberg, right? No. Secret is the operative term here because the general public was not informed by msm until after Bberg got outed by whistleblowers ie 'alternative media' ie actual journalism. Stop pretending it is the same media.







Fail.

The question you seem to be avoiding is *when did they begin covering Bberg?*

What year, (meaning after the 1960 fluffy stuff)?

You dont know, or do you....? Or is it you dont wanna know or admit?


This question, and its correct answer (date) proves msm did not report on Bbrg and whistleblowers until after Bberg was outed. (probably was after Bberg let msm know it was time to report, and how to report).

Pretending 'media' (in this context) means major media ie mainstream, is like lying.

Will you be splitting more hairs, or telling us when msm began reporting?

First, nobody cares about the Bilderberg meetings. They really don't.

So why would the media care?

Similar meetings are conducted year round all over the world, and nobody cares about those either.

Bilderberg is a magnet for communist not jobs, and that's about it.

Cosmic Yak 11th November 2018 01:56 AM

Let's have a look at the story so far.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12491648)

a) I didn't say one group owned media. I said 'they' referring to type..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12490086)

Never forget they own the media.

What "type" not only owns the media, but controls it, whilst taking orders from the Bilderbergers, to serve a common purpose, but at the same time is not one group? Surely this is just redefining the word "group" to avoid the necessity of backing up your claim with actual evidence.
Who owns the media, bubba? What is their connection to the Bilderberg group?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12490507)
Reporters knew it was off limits to actual investigative reporting. A little fluff was allowed or slipped past the dogs.

You have yet to provide any evidence at all for this claim.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12490507)
After Bilderberg's outing began with reports by real journalists like Estulin your media reported a little, mainly (as instructed) to smear people like Estulin and other actual journalists.

You have also not provided any evidence of these claimed instructions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12490507)
Early on (50s-60s) there were maybe ten tiny fluffy ha-ha mentions of Bilderberg in your media over a decade or so.

Ten mentions in a decade. For an annual meeting.
So, a report on every meeting then. Not a blackout.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12497455)
the 4 or or 5 fluffy gossipy items from 1950s-1960s.?

Hang on, how many items? Have we just lost half of them?

Oh well, no evidence anyway, so it doesn't really matter.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12497455)
No progress seen on your end....
As if you didnt know the issue is major media's blackout. Pretending 'media' (in context) means major media ie mainstream, is specifically dishonest. Your word game.

Here's the context. Please highlight the words "major" and/or "mainstream" in the text, or point to the place where this might be inferred.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12490086)

This indicates you have been misled. Disinformed. You might wanna give that some thought.

Its like 'nothing to see there, move along'. The last thing they're gonna do is encourage you to look behind the curtains. You sorely need new sources.

Never forget they own the media.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12490507)

real journalists like Estulin

With alternative definitions of "real" and "journalist".
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daniel_Estulin

Quote:

Major media avoided covering Bberg and the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups until after Bberg got outed.


Do tell please, when did msm such as NY Times, CBS, BBC, ABC, NBC, PBS, Time, Magazine, Wash Post etc first inform their audiences of Bberg's decades of secret meetings? (not counting the 4 or or 5 fluffy gossipy items from 1950s-1960s.?
Nope. Your claim, your burden of proof.
Please show the link between the rantings of Estulin and his ilk and the coverage of Bilderberg in the mainstream media.

In the meantime, here's what Rationalwiki has to say about early coverage.
Quote:

An early critic was none other than Phyllis Schlafly who, in her 1964 book A Choice, Not An Echo, claimed a liberal conspiracy of "kingmakers" led by the Bilderberg group had control over the Republican Party presidential nominating process and kept "real" conservatives from getting the nomination; her book was written in part to promote the 1964 campaign of Barry Goldwater, seen (by Schlafly) as a candidate free of Bilderberg influence. Another U.S. group, the wingnut Liberty Lobby (founded c.1955 by Willis Carto) took it upon themselves to send reporter James Tucker every year to "infiltrate" the Bilderberg conferences and report on their nefarious activities.

To summarise:
You have yet to show the existence of instructions to journalists and media outlets from the Bilderberg group.
You have yet to evidence a plan to restrict coverage of the meeting.
You have yet to evidence your claim that the msm only began coverage as a reaction to coverage from alternative sources, and then only to rubbish those claims.
You have yet to demonstrate what difference this coverage has made to anyone.
You have yet to evidence any wrongdoing or nefarious intent by the Bilderberg group.

Your constant demands that I do this for you will fall on deaf ears.
Your claims, your burden of proof.

Bubba 11th November 2018 10:12 AM

Gotta admit it He's right. MSM did its job. Nothing to see there.

Cosmic Yak 11th November 2018 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12498908)
Gotta admit it He's right. MSM did its job. Nothing to see there.

No answer, no evidence, no reason to consider anything you've said so far.
Good of you to concede this.

Bubba 11th November 2018 01:15 PM

Thank goodness we can pretend sarcasm is not sarcasm and proceed to 'debunk' it as if it is serious commentary. I think there's a word for that. Oh yeah....Strawman.

For the record.

He actually asserts that the earliest gossip pieces such as (paraphrased)

'..On the QT, rumor has it the Prime Minister plans on attending in June the next of the hush hush secretive annual meetings with elite world leaders and other bigwigs from all over...."

...which do not mention the word 'Bilderberg', qualify as MSM reporting on Bilderberg.


(correct me if he did not assert this)

He may be just joking, but also seems to claim that writers/whistleblowers exposing msm's silence are part of msm.

Bubba 11th November 2018 01:18 PM

Here


Quote:

I assume by all this that you are now admitting that there was no media blackout on Bilderberg, and that there have been journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time.

Bubba 11th November 2018 04:19 PM

I think here Q is implying someone has proof of ballot fraud.

But cannot be sure because the gibberish.


Quote:

D Party Officials Conducting Election Fraud Using Blank Ballots
2479
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
11 Nov 2018 - 8:36:43 AM

Drq26owWsAE-7Wy.jpg-large.jpg
WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?
1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?
2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?
3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?
4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?
Who safeguards 'blank' ballots?
Who issues 'blank' ballots?
Who controls 'blank' ballots?
How many 'blank' ballots are generated vs. total county pop?
THE CONTROL AND ISSUANCE OF BLANK BALLOTS IS KEY.
Why did the same counties [under dispute today] REFUSE to turn over voter registration information upon request to the Voter Fraud Commission?
Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and turned over to DHS?
What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...60764📁
Enemy @ the Front Door.
Q

Cosmic Yak 12th November 2018 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12499069)
Thank goodness we can pretend sarcasm is not sarcasm and proceed to 'debunk' it as if it is serious commentary. I think there's a word for that. Oh yeah....Strawman.

For the record.

He actually asserts that the earliest gossip pieces such as (paraphrased)

'..On the QT, rumor has it the Prime Minister plans on attending in June the next of the hush hush secretive annual meetings with elite world leaders and other bigwigs from all over...."

...which do not mention the word 'Bilderberg', qualify as MSM reporting on Bilderberg.


(correct me if he did not assert this)

He may be just joking, but also seems to claim that writers/whistleblowers exposing msm's silence are part of msm.

To whom are you referring?

Bubba 12th November 2018 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak (Post 12495545)
I assume by all this that you are now admitting that there was no media blackout on Bilderberg, and that there have been journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time.

So you figured out that they were the only ones reporting.


Let me get this straight...


Journalists, writers, protest groups, (whistle blowers) calling attention to Bberg long before msm finally covered it are now deemed somehow to be part of the msm which ignored Bberg and them, and later criticized them?

Are you joking or not?

Bubba 12th November 2018 05:31 PM

If you're not joking, the item below is part of your msm coverage of Bberg for a significant amount of time:


Quote:

'..On the QT, rumor has it the Prime Minister plans on attending in June the next of the hush hush secretive annual meetings with elite world leaders and other bigwigs from all over....'



How can gossip column items which do not mention the word 'Bilderberg', qualify as MSM reporting on Bilderberg?

Bubba 12th November 2018 06:40 PM

From Q..More gibberish. After Q said 'watch the water', this appeared:



8ch... "Watch the water" - I think /our guys/ have been watching the damn water for a long time, because our PORTS have been the door for all the weapons, drugs, people and cash.

Anon here is struggling to condense this theory into a format that works for this place, but i will try.

Last night a group of anons realized that Broward County sheriff Israel was in charge of not just security at the Fort Lauderdale Airport, but at Port Everglades.

Port Everglades has undergone MASSIVE expansion in recent years. It's bigger than the Port of Miami: https://www.ajot.com/premium/ajot-fl...eeper-channels

OK that said, let's recall that Dianne Feinstein and the Clinton were all tied to the leasing of the Port of Long Beach in California to the Chinese. Read this "ancient history" from 1997 for more: https://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/13/u...o-chinese.html

OK, so southeast coast, west coast, let's go to the upper midwest: Why were Democrats so froggy about getting control of Minnesota, of all places, and ramrodded woman-beating Muslim brotherhood Keith Ellison and some incestuous patsy woman to office? You know: Minnesota, site of the largest freshwater shipping port in the world? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_Ports

But those ports weren't enough for the cabal. No, they needed water access even closer to their dirty little den of thieves in Washington DC. Even given the group mistrust of George Webb, he has done some good boots-on-the-ground work about ports and tied them straight to Awan and John Brennan's Congressional spying, weapons-for-drugs trading network: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdNUrzbjrrwYouTube

Here, George visits the Port of Baltimore, points out the Inner Harbor condo where (murdered) author Tom Clancy used to live. In 1995, Clancy wrote "Op Center" with Steve Pieczenik. That same year, John Brennan establishes the Bin Laden Issues Center with a guy named Cofer Black (the reason the company was named Blackwater), out of Tysons Corner, Virginia. Remarkably, Tysons Corner is the first place where Imran Awan went to work. Clancy and Pieczenik got too close to the truth, and I think that's why he got 187'd. Pieczenik has probably been very, VERY careful since then.

After 9/11, our airports got locked down and air cargo was scrutinized closely. But not so much for ports. Could union dockworkers be compromised? Ever seen any movies and noticed what kind of characters work on docks? What about US Navy yards? What would guys like that do for drugs & hookers? Would they make sure some containers weren't security-checked during handling? Sure. And what if you had Sheriff Israel, a port leased and secured by the damn Chinese, and basically a bunch of comped Democrats in charge of minding the store? Brennan's rogue group was operating with impunity.

The whole premise of "Op Center" was to have a small, fast-response group to handle extra-hot problems at ports. In case of a situation, the problem would be directed to a counterterrorism threat center.

Imran Awan could easily be setting up pop-up kiosk shops selling specially chipped phones that would redirect data from those phones to (((their))) cell towers first. Awan was also bringing in the Pakistani ISI people and giving them fake IDs, then using them to do the construction IT work on the towers & phones.

The Terrorism Threat Intelligence Center was signed into operation by George Bush in 2003 to further sanction Brennan's rogue CIA operatives, and all of it operates…

… by water. It's a safe bet that /ourguys/ have been watching the water for a long time. "We have it all"

John Brennan should absolutely hang for his treason.

Bubba 12th November 2018 07:26 PM

Here are two resources Q anons use to monitor reactions to Q's drops, especially social media sites.

Example;
How xbox chat was quickly shut down for 'maintenance' the day Q said it had been used for back channel comms by obama/comey/hillary.


https://downdetector.com/

Real-Time Cyber-Attack Map Shows Scope of Global Cyber War

https://www.newsweek.com/real-time-c...ber-war-352886

Bubba 12th November 2018 07:40 PM

Revealing analysis of strategy by Qanon. Its kinda long, so I'm putting in a spoiler. I know some here will not comprehend, sorry. Ask others to explain it to you


Quote:

How does the eagle defeat the goat?

Here, watch: example1YouTube – example2 YouTube (1:06 to 2:02).

As you can see, the eagle takes the goat from the top of the mountain, flies with it until the altitude is high enough for the goat to not survive if it falls, then it lets it go.
Analysis:



The strategy behind the eagle’s attack is brilliant. The eagle knows if he attacks the goat and keeps the fight at the ground level, the goat would surpass it in weight and strength. Instead, the eagle smartly invites the goat to deal with the law of gravity and transforms the goat’s weight and strength into a fatal liability. Those who are familiar with martial arts know the same principle is used in Aikido.

Application.
What if you know Dems have been committing voter fraud for decades to steal elections and you want to stop it once and for all? You let the goat climb the mountain (allow elections), then you pick it and fly with it until the altitude is high enough (gather evidence), then you let it deal with the law of gravity (enforce the law). As you can see, their illegal voters and fraudulent activities they thought were their strength become a fatal liability when their party will have to deal with the law…

Q2479 WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?
1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?
2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?
3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?
4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?

Another interesting thing to notice is if the goat had not climbed the mountain, it would probably have been safer. As you can see, Mother Nature herself recommends goats should remain in low altitudes which translates to Dems should never be in charge… :)

The critical element that makes the eagle’s strategy work is the ability to enforce the law. The eagle knows this very well and believes that the law of gravity vanishing at the very moment it attacks the goat is statistically impossible. Hence the relevance of Law Enforcement, the Senate and, ultimately, the Supreme Court for the stability of our Republic.

If the United States remains the United States as we know it, the Rule of Law should prevail and the goat will be the eagle’s dinner… End of the story.

However, in the hypothesis our stupid goat invokes Satan and his buddy Baphomet Img1PNG in a desperate attempt to question the Rule of Law, the Republic and our institutions in order to bring chaos to our Country, Q poetically reminds us the conditions in which Martial Law may be applied:

Q2460 "..or in response to chaos associated with protests and mob action," Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Q

So? Relax. Their expected attempt to steal the midterms cannot prosper: it holds the germs of their own disintegration. You remember? Gravity can be very tricky…

Q2463 Will recent [expected] voter fraud actions by the D party provide support for a VOTER ID LAW? VOTER ID LAW = DEATH OF D PARTY. Boomerang Suicide? Q

Now that this is out of the way, let’s take a closer look at other things.

I told you in my previous post how the Maestro skillfully let Dems invest billions of dollars in the midterms to win the House and ended up with an empty shell. I also told you that Gowdy and Goodlatte were in the know. Then, Q gratified us with Q2888 which links to this article where we learn Gowdy and Ratcliffe are considered to be potential picks for the AG position. In the meantime, the current Acting AG Whitaker is being attacked for having made statements in the past that Dems wrongly consider to justify his recusal from the Mueller probe link. Do you see it? Do you now see why Gowdy made statements that made him appear as he was supporting Mueller against Trump causing many excellent Trump supporters to think he was disloyal? link1 - link2. These statements were well positioned on the political credit timeline so that, in due course, they would be spent to shut down any criticism from the Dems regarding Gowdy’s ability to be an impartial AG.

Q1656 Make no mistake- Rep Gowdy is a Patriot. Q

Q537 TRUST SESSIONS.

Q537 What ROLE might TG be walking into?

These last two drops informed us as early as in January 2018 that the plan all along was to get Sessions to progress as far as his recusal allowed him to by stealthily coaching the sealed indictments, Huber and Horowitz while Gowdy (with Goodlatte) was taking the House investigations to the 10 yard line. Then, when it would be time to move from the investigation phase to the justice phase, Sessions would gracefully let Gowdy replace him while all the investigation paperwork would migrate to Grassley’s desk in the Senate. Brilliant.

This beautiful game of musical chairs needed a nice transition and this is why the Maestro gave us Whitaker:

Q2468 The 'Scaramucci' Play Temp hire to remove embedded 'untrustworthy' staffers? >Spicer >Priebus Temps can be very dangerous to those who are targeted. Think Whitaker.

As you can see, Q also likes football and he is sharing with us the beauty of the outstanding ‘Scaramucci’ Play which is deadly with Temps around the 10 yard line.

Q2462 >What is the advantage of having a ‘temp’ (‘acting’) in a leadership position?

Acid Jazz answer: he does not give a single nugget about what people think. He doesn’t worry about anythingYouTube. He’s loyal and always thereYouTube for you. He would never stopYouTube and never give up. He is determined and whatever happens, he keeps on movingYouTube.

Trump positioned Whitaker to cleanse the DOJ from all its versions of Spicer and Priebus and to attract the controversy that only a Senate confirmed AG would put to rest. In chess terminology, we have a Zugzwang: if Whitaker remains acting AG, his now famous weight lifting expertise will get more and more trash bags out of the DOJ every day, and if he’s prematurely forced out, Gowdy or someone with the similar dynamics gets in quicker. Have fun with this Dems…

Do you watch House M.D? In many levels, this TV show is now apropos. Here is a 40 second clip 0-0:40YouTube. Did you catch at 0:23 how the bloody Deep State choses to take the money and stop the cure distribution?

Q693 When does big pharma make money? Curing or containing?

Yes, I watch TV shows to know what these Satanists are up to. You want another example? Sure. Let’s watch a clip from ScandalYouTube. Did you catch it? What is B613? Since F=6 and M=13, B613=BFM which is code for Baphomet… The whole Scandal TV show is in the [goat/Baphomet territory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Witch_(2015_film) and is about the "Satanization" of our institutions.

Q3 Many in our govt worship Satan.

You thought Olivia Pope’s last name and cute white outfits were coincidences? Expand…

Don’t’ worry, I’ll probably write about TV shows one day. It’s a fascinating topic. For now, let’s go back to Dr. House and how it relates to the strategy I have described earlier.

Once upon a time, America was ill. Very ill. After a 2016 consultation, Dr. Congress recommended a... JS: a Judicial Surgery.

Step1: Anesthesia. Jeff Sessions, by recusing himself and seeming to not know why he was here, administered powerful soporific and anesthetic drugs to the Dems who immediately went to sleep. While they were snoring, he silently prepared the sealed indictments and other legal goodies with the help of Huber and Horowitz. Then, he left the operating room.

Q2452 Thank you for your service to our Country, Mr. Jeff Sessions! Your sacrifices will never be forgotten. Q+

Step2: Disinfection. Whitaker came in to disinfect the patient and heavily Scaramuccize the DOJ and its vicinity as long as his time in the operating room would allow it.

Q1126 “A clean [H]ouse is very important.” Q

The brief Scaramuccization of the White House proved to be a particularly efficient operation in the past:

Q2470 WHEN DID WH LEAKS CEASE?

In Whitaker’s case, the word is that declas and sealed indictments are particularly powerful disinfectants…

Q2478 Let the unsealing begin. Let the DEC[L]AS begin.

Step3: Surgery. When Whitaker is done, Senate confirmed Gowdy (or someone in the same dynamics) gets in the operating room to start the surgery. For having chaired the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and led the related investigations during Sessions’ anesthesia phase, he knows exactly where to cut, he knows exactly which instrument to use, he knows exactly which organ to change…

Q2450 We are going to show you a new world. Those who are blind will soon see the light. A beautiful brave new world lies ahead. We take this journey together. One step at a time. WWG1WGA!

Q

Elagabalus 12th November 2018 08:08 PM

Nice spoiler. That dude is a total douche.

:dl:

ETA: Scaramuccization?!

Axxman300 12th November 2018 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12500506)
Last night a group of anons realized that Broward County sheriff Israel was in charge of not just security at the Fort Lauderdale Airport, but at Port Everglades.

Port Everglades has undergone MASSIVE expansion in recent years. It's bigger than the Port of Miami: https://www.ajot.com/premium/ajot-fl...eeper-channels

...and?

Also, DHS runs the show at the airport.


Quote:

Here, George visits the Port of Baltimore, points out the Inner Harbor condo where (murdered) author Tom Clancy used to live.
If Clancy was "murdered" it was by R.J Reynolds.

Quote:

In 1995, Clancy wrote "Op Center" with Steve Pieczenik.
His worst book because Pieczenik wrote it, and Clancy just slapped his name on it.

Quote:

That same year, John Brennan establishes the Bin Laden Issues Center with a guy named Cofer Black
Nope. David Cohen thought of it, and Michael Sheuer put it together. It became Alec Station, which is common knowledge today. Cofer Black wasn't put in charge of the CTC until four years later.

These are all unchallenged, basic facts.

Quote:

(the reason the company was named Blackwater)
Cofer Black had nothing to do with Blackwater until 2006. The company was named after the swamp they bought on the Virginia/North Carolina border to train their guys in.

Another lie.


Quote:

, out of Tysons Corner, Virginia. Remarkably, Tysons Corner is the first place where Imran Awan went to work. Clancy and Pieczenik got too close to the truth, and I think that's why he got 187'd. Pieczenik has probably been very, VERY careful since then.
To recap: You've confused Alec Station with Blackwater, and now you're linking Awan to the death of Tom Clancy.

Cool story, bro.

Quote:

After 9/11, our airports got locked down and air cargo was scrutinized closely. But not so much for ports. Could union dockworkers be compromised? Ever seen any movies and noticed what kind of characters work on docks?
Yes, they're called Longshoremen, they work hard, and do honest work.

Movies are not reality, only a fool thinks they are.

Quote:

What about US Navy yards?
What about them? You need a clearance to work at a Naval facility.

Quote:

What would guys like that do for drugs & hookers?
What do you do for yours?

Quote:

Would they make sure some containers weren't security-checked during handling?
That's a felony, and US Customs does not fool around.


Quote:

Sure. And what if you had Sheriff Israel, a port leased and secured by the damn Chinese, and basically a bunch of comped Democrats in charge of minding the store? Brennan's rogue group was operating with impunity.
This is like a sad Disneyland ride.

Quote:

The whole premise of "Op Center" was to have a small, fast-response group to handle extra-hot problems at ports. In case of a situation, the problem would be directed to a counterterrorism threat center.
Have you ever seen a map of the United States? We have a big coast line that is barely patrolled by the USCG. In Big Sur, 26 miles from where I sit, real Chinese smugglers and Mexican Cartels routinely put boats ashore with people, or drugs, or guns. Monterey County has only one Sheriff's deputy patrolling Highway 1 between Carmel to a spot south of Big Sur, and the CHP deploys maybe two cars.

Real smugglers don't need ports.

Quote:

Imran Awan could easily be setting up pop-up kiosk shops selling specially chipped phones that would redirect data from those phones to (((their))) cell towers first. Awan was also bringing in the Pakistani ISI people and giving them fake IDs, then using them to do the construction IT work on the towers & phones.
Evidence?

Quote:

The Terrorism Threat Intelligence Center was signed into operation by George Bush in 2003 to further sanction Brennan's rogue CIA operatives, and all of it operates…
The ODNI?

Quote:

… by water. It's a safe bet that /ourguys/ have been watching the water for a long time. "We have it all"

John Brennan should absolutely hang for his treason.
Do you fact check anything?

Axxman300 12th November 2018 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elagabalus (Post 12500591)
Nice spoiler. That dude is a total douche.

:dl:

ETA: Scaramuccization?!

I think it's nice alcoholics have internet access.

Bubba 12th November 2018 10:50 PM

From Qanon Nov 13 :

Quote:

Qanon is Now the 2nd Most Attacked by Fake News (POTUS Being the 1st)
2491
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
2018-11-13T04:13:00.000Z
#1 attacked person by FAKE NEWS [+swamp [R+D]]?
POTUS
#2 attacked entity by FAKE NEWS [+swamp [R+D]]?
Q
As of 3:02 pm est today, "Qanon" is now the #2 most attacked entity behind POTUS within the U.S.
[R+D COORDINATED BLITZ ATTACK]
Logical Thinking > WHY?
WHY WOULD THE BIGGEST MEDIA CO'S IN THE WORLD CONTINUE TO ATTACK THIS MOVEMENT?
2+2=4
Congratulations, Anons!
YOU ARE NOW THE SECOND BIGGEST THREAT TO THE ESTABLISHMENT.
BADGE OF HONOR!
SOMETHING BIG IS ABOUT TO DROP.
Q

Elagabalus 12th November 2018 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 12500694)
From Qanon Nov 13 :

Yep. We've got "Boogie Stick's" range and windage. It's just a matter of time. Bwahahahahahahaha.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2015-19, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.