Use this for your hypothetical thought experiment.

http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uplo...1-48-16-PM.png

I see. So you think the photographs of all the damage evidence was doctored to make it look like the lateral impact of small projectiles, rather than what they were showing on television. Your logic gives me chills.

Why would I be outraged about someone making up the dumbest lies lies, and mock the murder of thousands.

Who did your fantasy version of 9/11?

You can't grasp physics.

I was on active duty on 9/11 and find your claims to be false, and an insult to all Americans. You live in a fantasy world based on ignorance and hate of others, and those who died on 9/11.

You will do anything to avoid answering my question, won't you?

I could do it for real, but I want to find out what you think would happen.

You are saying that unless the aluminium cladding is sliced all the way through, including the parts around the sides, there won't be any damage to the steel square section?

(Edit: I can add a layer of fire retardant between my aluminium and steel if you like, just name the material)

Here you go a few of the thousands killed on 9/11, and you make up lies about missiles.

Vincent Paul Abate, 40, Brooklyn, N.Y., Cantor Fitzgerald, World Trade Center.

Laurence Christopher Abel, 37, New York City, Cantor Fitzgerald, World Trade Center.

Alona Abraham, 30, Ashdod, Israel, Passenger, United 175, World Trade Center.

William F. Abrahamson, 55, Westchester County, N.Y., Marsh&McLennan Companies, Inc., World Trade Center.

Richard Anthony Aceto, 42, Marsh&McLennan Companies, Inc., World Trade Center.

Heinrich Bernhard Ackermann, 38, Aon Corporation, World Trade Center.

Paul Acquaviva, 29, Glen Rock, N.J., Cantor Fitzgerald, World Trade Center.

Christian Adams, 37, Passenger, United 93, Shanksville, Pa.

Donald LaRoy Adams, 28, Cantor Fitzgerald, World Trade Center.

Lives ended by 19 failed humans who hated American, and you make up lies.


And here some at the end of the alphabet...

Zhe Zeng, 28, Bank of New York, World Trade Center.

Marc Scott Zeplin, 33, Westchester, N.Y., Cantor Fitzgerald, World Trade Center.

Jie Yao Justin Zhao, 27, New York City, CompuCom Systems, Inc., World Trade Center.

Yuguang Zheng, Passenger, American 77, Pentagon.

Ivelin Ziminski, 41, Tarrytown, N.Y., Marsh&McLennan Companies, Inc., World Trade Center.

Michael Joseph Zinzi, 37, Newfoundland, N.J., Marsh&McLennan Companies, Inc., World Trade Center.

Charles Alan Zion, 54, Greenwich, Conn., Cantor Fitzgerald, World Trade Center.

Julie Lynne Zipper, 44, Paramus, N.J., Sandler O'Neill visitor from SunGard Data Systems, Inc., World Trade Center.

Salvatore J. Zisa, 45, Hawthorne, N.J., Marsh&McLennan Companies, Inc., World Trade Center.

Prokopios Paul Zois, 46, Lynbrook, N.Y., Marsh&McLennan consultant from American Express, World Trade Center.

Joseph J. Zuccala, 54, Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y., Fuji Bank, Ltd., World Trade Center.

Andrew Steven Zucker, 27, Riverdale, N.Y., Harris Beach LLP, World Trade Center.

Igor Zukelman, 29, Fiduciary Trust Company International, World Trade Center.


Tell me, have you told all those who knew these people, their parents, family, kids, that you know the truth?

Did you try to confirm those who were killed before spreading the dumbest lie in history? You failed to prove the videos are fake - FAILED

What? No, if I was going to expend the time, effort and energy to create fantastically amazing CGI versions of events depicting aircraft striking the towers then I sure as hell would also manipulate, or outright create, still photographic evidence to the same effect.

I ask again:

What exactly is your justification that those photos you use to argue your point are in any way legitimate in the first place, given that you claim video evidence not?

You think that the wing would exert no force on the steel column unless it has "passed through" any intervening material?

Think again

Bumping again one of the questions yankee451 is studiously avoiding.

The box wasn't square, was it.

I am treating your question as any other assaulting my intelligence.

Liar

So what do you think would happen to the steel square section and aluminium cladding I am talking about? Do you think I could dent the steel square section without completely severing the aluminium?

That is the general case.

Then we can move on to find out why you think that this particular case would be different.

He's actually studiously avoided answering the question ever since I first asked it way back in post 179.

Hey yankee451, If the aircraft N334AA and N612UA did not hit the WTC towers on September 11, 2001, what happened to the airframes and to the people who were aboard the flights? The people and the aircraft existed at 8:30 AM EST that day, but by 9:30 AM they were no more. What happened to them?

yankee451,

Maybe use this one
https://robinsrevision.files.wordpre...ge-7.png?w=620
So your contention is that the aluminium wing spar could not exert any force on the steel column until it has "passed through" the aluminium cladding, yes?

If you repeat that phrase three times and click your heels you'll be invisible to
dogs, thereby avoiding being watered.

FIFY

Pah! Holograms!

The last time we had a moderately strong earthquake, witnesses reported bombs, freight trains, lightning, the rapture and Godzilla.

Didn't quite work out that way, did it. Seems like people engage in hyperbole when faced with traumatizing events.

Or are you a no-quaker too?

No, that's not my contention, and you know it. Before it could cut the steel, it would cut the aluminum. That's my contention. My conclusion is that it was not struck from the front, as seen in the aluminum cladding that was not cut.

Wow. So this means the steel wasn't bent sharply in a completely different direction than the mostly hollow aluminum wing was traveling.

I see, so that means the lightly bent cladding and the gouged and sharply bend steel columns are consistent with the head on impact of a jet. I get it.

Wipe your chin.

Oh the horror!

How have you verified all of these stories? I think the're B.S., therefore I don't really worry about their fictional families. I'm in the book if they want to reach out to me.

Their emotional tales don't change the evidence that proves they're B.S.

Until the media broadcast the cartoon plane flying behind the towers, followed by the fireball that erupted from the opposite side of the tower, no one was sure what happened, but most of the reports were that something other than a large jet struck. The truth hurts, but it will set you free.

Wow, no. It means that people will often respond to a sudden traumatic events with hyperbolic terms which aren't accurate descriptors.

Has nothing to do with your provably inaccurate photo analysis.

How would I know that? You are not exactly forthcoming on this topic. "Pass through" was your expression.

So are you saying that the column will not be affected at all until the aluminium cladding is "cut"?

Or will you at least concede that the column itself will start to compress almost as soon as the aluminium starts to compress?

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

I prefer clementines, thanks.

I think this is getting out of hands. I was following with a mild amusement this clowns insulting members of this forum left right and centre, but there is no way to be amused by his outrageous attitude to the victims of this tragedy and their families. If there is a vote to ban him from this forum, you have both my hands up. I am sure such a decision would't cause any grief or damage.

Here's the problem, Skippy, the aluminum sheet WAS CUT and later fell off.


https://i.imgur.com/W89yUZ1.jpg





https://i.imgur.com/NIS9e5k.jpg

Different tower.

Sure, why not. Please demonstrate using a wing and some steel box columns built to the same specifications as the WTC, and show me how the wing slices the steel without slicing the cladding. And then you can explain why only this one piece of cladding remained standing (even though the hole behind it was huge), albeit bent in the wrong direction, but the aluminum cladding to the left and right of this lone column, were sliced off. Don't mention the steel columns also bent sharply in the wrong direction.

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/...1-1024x912.png

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/...ith_circle.png

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/...s-1024x640.png

:jaw-dropp

Here is the full damage for the tower in question:

https://robinsrevision.files.wordpre...outh.jpg?w=800

Here is a close up of the loose cladding:

https://robinsrevision.files.wordpre...ge-4.png?w=567

It looks like there is a hole in the middle, but the sides are still intact.

That is consistent with it being hit from the front.

Not consistent with a cruise missile having hit it from the side.

You are still to explain what kind of a missile could do that. Don't forget the wing on the right side.

Something like this?

https://robinsrevision.files.wordpre...ge-5.png?w=706

Beat me to it.

Doesn't matter.

Every facet of the attack are an outrageous lie perpetrated by the US government spread through their puppet mainstream media. This is clearly evident from the fuzzy crops Steve has created from images released through mainstream media sources.

Entirely plausible.

Yes. Something like a JASSM can explain it nicely. The warhead is designed for punching through hardened targets with or without detonating. At an angle of attack of somewhere around 15 degrees from parallel to the tower, the wing of the missile would hit first, which is why at the far left of both towers the cladding is only lightly damaged. The progressively worse damage to the columns is explained by the warhead penetrating deeper into the tower, but it loses energy as it penetrated so what began with gouged steel columns ends up only bending them as it slows down.

A rocket sled test center can put this conclusion to the test.

http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uplo...3/Approach.jpg


Something like this:
https://youtu.be/5_a1foRId6M

Sure it is, it cut through the sides of both the steel and the cladding, but only through the face of the steel. The warhead pushed out the cladding from the inside as it passed behind it. I'm surprised it was damaged as little as it was, considering a 900 lb warhead just blew a big hole in the steel that cladding was covering.

I explain it in detail in this post.
https://911crashtest.org/9-11-truth-...e-shaped-hole/

The first 9 columns from the left of both impact holes are enough to prove what didn't do it, and what probably did. However the right side is a bit different from the left.
https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/...ngTipright.jpg