International Skeptics Forum

International Skeptics Forum (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumindex.php)
-   Religion and Philosophy (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   No one can grasp 'time'; Not even a scientist (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=354560)

MaartenVergu 2nd October 2021 07:44 AM

No one can grasp 'time'; Not even a scientist
 
If there was an infinite amount of time in the past, then it would have taken infinite time for time to reach to our present moment. We would never meet the present moment. So, we can't postulate that there was an infinite amount of time before our present moment. But it's also hard to grasp that there was a fixed amount of time in our past and 'nothing before that'. How can we have an idea of what that means? We can't. Conclusion: not even a scientist can grasp 'time' and 'infinity'. Our minds can't grasp it. No math or science can discover this part of reality.
That's one of the mysteries of reality we can only meet with 'awe'.

alfaniner 2nd October 2021 08:02 AM

tl;dr

RecoveringYuppy 2nd October 2021 08:36 AM

The idea that infinities can't be traversed is not well founded.

sackett 2nd October 2021 09:27 AM

Okay, here we go again: What was there before the Big Bang?

Gord_in_Toronto 2nd October 2021 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sackett (Post 13617599)
Okay, here we go again: What was there before the Big Bang?

Oo. Oo. Let me -- God!

And I'm still placing my money on the hare not the tortoise.

Wudang 2nd October 2021 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13617504)
No math or science

Propositional analysis FTW.

P.J. Denyer 2nd October 2021 09:51 AM

I can't =/= no one can

There's a lot of things I can't grasp but I don't assume my lack of understanding is universal.

ynot 2nd October 2021 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13617504)
If there was an infinite amount of time in the past, then it would have taken infinite time for time to reach to our present moment. We would never meet the present moment. So, we can't postulate that there was an infinite amount of time before our present moment. But it's also hard to grasp that there was a fixed amount of time in our past and 'nothing before that'. How can we have an idea of what that means? We can't. Conclusion: not even a scientist can grasp 'time' and 'infinity'. Our minds can't grasp it. No math or science can discover this part of reality.
That's one of the mysteries of reality we can only meet with 'awe'.

Well I guess that might explain why gods never turn up to meet the present moment. :p

It's almost like "infinite" is a purely abstract concept created by humans (like "gods").

But seriously (sorta), isn’t “infinite amount” an oxymoron? Please explain how infinite can be an amount . . .

To save the infinite vs eternal debate, let’s just say time/existence is eternal.

Or we could say eternity is the infinity of time/existence.

Captain_Swoop 2nd October 2021 11:54 AM

Is this to do with Zeno again?

Hlafordlaes 2nd October 2021 01:04 PM

Time is finite. For example, I do not have time for this. Case closed.

Steve 2nd October 2021 01:16 PM

No one can grasp 'time'; Not even a scientist
 
Douglas Adams understood time perfectly well:

“Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.”

catsmate 2nd October 2021 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sackett (Post 13617599)
Okay, here we go again: What was there before the Big Bang?

The Big Crunch of the previous universe.

Steve 2nd October 2021 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catsmate (Post 13617865)
The Big Crunch of the previous universe.

Did that occur in *time*?

ynot 2nd October 2021 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve (Post 13617900)
Did that occur in *time*?

Yes, unless time was "out to lunch" :p

suren 2nd October 2021 03:05 PM

According to present scientific theories, time started when Big Bang happened. But as far as I know no major scientific theory prohibits infinite future.

ynot 2nd October 2021 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suren (Post 13617908)
According to present scientific theories, time started when Big Bang happened. But as far as I know no major scientific theory prohibits infinite future.

How did Big Bang begin to happen before there was time, when the initial act of beginning requires time?

"The chicken and egg came simultaneously" isn't a valid answer.

Steve 2nd October 2021 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ynot (Post 13617910)
How did Big Bang begin to happen before there was time, when the initial act of beginning requires time?

"The chicken and egg came simultaneously" isn't a valid answer.

Why does the initial act of beginning require time?

ynot 2nd October 2021 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve (Post 13617912)
Why does the initial act of beginning require time?

To claim The Singularity changed it's state of existence (acted) in no time is to say it didn't do it. Doing is an act that takes time (doing time).

suren 2nd October 2021 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ynot (Post 13617910)
How did Big Bang begin to happen before there was time, when the initial act of beginning requires time?

"The chicken and egg came simultaneously" isn't a valid answer.

Time and space in relativity theory are tightly connected. That's why it's often called space-time. So "before Bing Bang" is probably a wrong question regardless of how counter intuitive this sounds. By "Big Bang happened" I meant time started with Big Bang.

Steve 2nd October 2021 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ynot (Post 13617916)
To claim The Singularity changed it's state of existence (acted) in no time is to say it didn't do it. Doing is an act that takes time (doing time).

Did space also exist? Or did the universe change its state of existence nowhere? Seems that for consistency if time was required then space was equally required. Therefore no big bang because no state of existence was changed.

ynot 2nd October 2021 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suren (Post 13617918)
Time and space in relativity theory are tightly connected. That's why it's often called space-time. So "before Bing Bang" is probably a wrong question regardless of how counter intuitive this sounds. By "Big Bang happened" I meant time started with Big Bang.

Yet the theory seems to have no problem with describing before Bing Bang as being a Singularity. My question is how to change from Singularity to Bing Bang in no time at all?

ynot 2nd October 2021 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve (Post 13617921)
Did space also exist? Or did the universe change its state of existence nowhere? Seems that for consistency if time was required then space was equally required. Therefore no big bang because no state of existence was changed.

I'm not the one claiming things didn't exist before Big Bang, or even that there was or wasn't a Big Bang.

Did a Singularity exist before Big Bang? Please don't ask me to define "exist", you do that if you have a problem with the word.

To answer your question - My current "best guess" conclusion is that what exists now has existed eternally in some form or another. The state of existence is constantly changing so it would be no surprise to me if it was much different in the past, in fact it would be a surprise to me if it wasn't. I accept something from something, I don't accept something from nothing. I don't accept time began from no time. I don't accept that time is an actual, substantive thing. Time to me is merely a generic term we apply to actual, substantive things doing things compared to other actual, substantive things doing different things.

Kid Eager 2nd October 2021 04:12 PM

Somebody got give The Beginner’s Book of Philosophy for their birthday. Happy Birthday. I look forward to additional threads articulating poorly understood concepts.

ynot 2nd October 2021 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kid Eager (Post 13617946)
Somebody got give The Beginner’s Book of Philosophy for their birthday. Happy Birthday. I look forward to additional threads articulating poorly understood concepts.

Ad hominin attacks the best argument you got?

Oh, how droll.

Captain_Swoop 2nd October 2021 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ynot (Post 13617930)
I'm not the one claiming things didn't exist before Big Bang, or even that there was or wasn't a Big Bang.

Did a Singularity exist before Big Bang? Please don't ask me to define "exist", you do that if you have a problem with the word.

To answer your question - My current "best guess" conclusion is that what exists now has existed eternally in some form or another. The state of existence is constantly changing so it would be no surprise to me if it was much different in the past, in fact it would be a surprise to me if it wasn't. I accept something from something, I don't accept something from nothing. I don't accept time began from no time. I don't accept that time is an actual, substantive thing. Time to me is merely a generic term we apply to actual, substantive things doing things compared to other actual, substantive things doing different things.

That's the thing. We don't know.

That doesn't mean you get to make stuff up.

ynot 2nd October 2021 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop (Post 13617957)
That's the thing. We don't know.

That doesn't mean you get to make stuff up.

Rubbish! I get to make up as much stuff as I like, as long as I don't claim it's anything other than made-up "best guess" stuff.

I'm not claiming I know, but it seems some are claiming they do.

My point is it takes time for things to begin to happen. How could time begin to happen before there was time in which time could begin to happen?

Kid Eager 2nd October 2021 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ynot (Post 13617948)
Ad hominin attacks the best argument you got?

Oh, how droll.

Droll indeed. You appear to believe that:
A. I’m making an argument, and
B. The post fulfills the definition of an ad-hom.

Trebuchet 2nd October 2021 06:56 PM

Its a big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey... stuff.

theprestige 2nd October 2021 06:58 PM

The process and rules that we understand as time, that makes up a necessary part of our understanding of and interaction with the reality in which we find ourselves...

... The very rules that we use to exploit time and space tell us those rules break down under certain conditions. Those same rules tell us that those conditions very likely existed in the past from which this reality emerged.

Go back far enough, and things stop making sense according to the rules we have. That's where ynot finds himself.

Obviously something must have been going on before the big bang. We just have no idea what rules govern it, or whether it's even possible for things bound by the rules of spacetime as we understand them can ever make sense of it.

shemp 2nd October 2021 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ynot (Post 13617910)
How did Big Bang begin to happen before there was time, when the initial act of beginning requires time?

"The chicken and egg came simultaneously" isn't a valid answer.

Since nobody knows what time really is, we also don't know that the act of beginning requires time. Perhaps time is a product of the initial conditions and there was no "before."

shemp 2nd October 2021 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve (Post 13617900)
Did that occur in *time*?

No, it was actually ten minutes late.

MaartenVergu 3rd October 2021 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gord_in_Toronto (Post 13617607)
Oo. Oo. Let me -- God!

And I'm still placing my money on the hare not the tortoise.

God? Who is talking about a God here? No one. Strange deduction.

MaartenVergu 3rd October 2021 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P.J. Denyer (Post 13617615)
I can't =/= no one can

There's a lot of things I can't grasp but I don't assume my lack of understanding is universal.

So, you claim you understand all these things? You claim you grasp 'infinity' while it's mind-blowing for most of us? WOW. You must be a real genius.

erlando 3rd October 2021 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13618128)
What are you talking about? Again? I'm new here on the forum. What 'again'?

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13618129)
God? Who is talking about a God here? No one. Strange deduction.

What you fail to understand is that what might seem to you as a revalation is in no way unique. Your exact argument has been made a number of times on this forum and it almost always boils down to "god did it". So forum veterans are just jumping the gun.

Dave Rogers 3rd October 2021 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13618130)
So, you claim you understand all these things? You claim you grasp 'infinity' while it's mind-blowing for most of us? WOW. You must be a real genius.

So, you claim that if you don't currently understand anything, nobody can possibly understand it? That's rather arrogant of you.

Dave

P.J. Denyer 3rd October 2021 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13618130)
So, you claim you understand all these things? You claim you grasp 'infinity' while it's mind-blowing for most of us? WOW. You must be a real genius.

No, I don't. But the point clearly went over your head.

MaartenVergu 3rd October 2021 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by erlando (Post 13618133)
What you fail to understand is that what might seem to you as a revalation is in no way unique. Your exact argument has been made a number of times on this forum and it almost always boils down to "god did it". So forum veterans are just jumping the gun.

What you fail to understand is that it's not because other people made these 'exact arguments' and it boils down to 'god did it' that I'm like these other people. Non sequitur.

erlando 3rd October 2021 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13617504)
Conclusion: not even a scientist can grasp 'time' and 'infinity'. Our minds can't grasp it. No math or science can discover this part of reality.
That's one of the mysteries of reality we can only meet with 'awe'.

Well, scientists tend to move past the awe phase and move right to the "We don't know but how can we find out"-phase.

erlando 3rd October 2021 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaartenVergu (Post 13618140)
What you fail to understand is that it's not because other people made these 'exact arguments' and it boils down to 'god did it' that I'm like these other people. Non sequitur.

That was not the point of my post.

MaartenVergu 3rd October 2021 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Rogers (Post 13618134)
So, you claim that if you don't currently understand anything, nobody can possibly understand it? That's rather arrogant of you.

Dave

It's the complete opposite of arrogance. It's recognizing that we all are small in relation to 'the universe' and its mysteries. And no. No God is mentioned here.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2015-20, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.