![]() |
Quote:
|
That doesn't seem compatible with Modi saying that there was a total ban on leaving the home. Maybe like his mentor he makes yuuuuge claims and leaves it to others to sort out the practicalities
|
It's just like the other places on lockdown. A total ban on leaving your home for anything other than life essentials.
|
Quote:
Given that the foecal-oral route of transmission is a major means of infection, I'm deeply concerned as to how it's all going to pan out for you. Stay well clear of this sucker, mate - I don't imagine Indian hospitals will be good places for the next few months. |
The virus is bringing the Nazi's out of the woodwork again. This tweet has gone viral. The ******* who posted it has since tried to walk it back, but is only digging himself in deeper
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ET1Xh5eUEAAH3RR.jpg |
Trump will make America a Pariah State. Literally.
|
I have a small retail shop (in Canada) that is on the esential list .. but it doesn't make much difference, only one or two people a day have been coming in for the last week or so.
I have to wait to April to see if I can apply for assistance. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
One real bright spot is the rate of infections in Italy is dropping, it seems the measures there are having the desired effect.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Seems like the lockdown is going to serve as an opportunity for police excess and targeted harassment.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Come and have a good rant in the Covid rant thread. There are so many things that make me furious about the entire cock-up that I'm a frequent visitor. Governments are showing how completely worthless they are when faced with an unexpected crisis. |
Oh, and here's a positive for you - while Covid has killed 7000 Chinese, it might have saved ten times that number: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcm.../#6ae836ce34fe
|
Quote:
But is it one they are going to take up? |
Quote:
|
Does Trump really think that he can schedule the end of the pandemic to Easter Sunday, it would be nice but it is not up to us.
|
Quote:
What could be more appropriate for god's chosen people to resurrect their nation on the day Jesus didn't rise from the dead? |
Quote:
|
It's not surprising, but it seems that the epicentre of our local outbreak of Coronavirus is the local hospital - The Royal Gwent.
The only fatality in our local town contracted Coronavirus in hospital and the only people we know personally who may have had Coronavirus (though due to a lack of testing there's no certainty) had recently visited that hospital. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...marita-edwards |
Quote:
High dollar orders will be a sign that things will get back to normal soon. China generally has a lead time of 90-120 days from order to delivery. |
Quote:
I think that in this sub-forum, the USA should be treated as part of the world, and be admissible. Only posts that are exclusively dealing with the USA should be moved. It does not make sense that it is inadmissible to compare politics of the USA and other countries. |
BBC: Prince Charles tests positive.
|
Prince Charles has been tested for COVID-19 (he has mild symptoms and has tested positive). There still aren't any tests available for doctors and nurses nor for any normal person without very severe symptoms - but things are different when you're royal.
|
Quote:
Britain is to have Royalty who are treated differently, or they are to have no Royalty at all. Take your choice. |
We're all in this together. Except that we aren't.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And we have more than one spare, he is hardly unique. |
Well the Prime Minister of Canadas wife has Covid-19 as well and the PM has been social distancing as well. I don't think people who don't show signs of the virus should be tested that would just be wasteful.
|
This twitter thread about how the UK government is failing to protect frontline medical staff, and failing to follow WHO's advice is infuriating. Worth reading the whole thing (it's short), but the key points are: a British company making a rapid test is exporting them because it can't sell them to the NHS here; a company who makes PPE has also been turned down for selling them to the NHS, while NHS staff have inadequate PPE and are being told to share masks; WHO is urging countries to test as many people as possible, yet the UK is only testing people admitted to hospital, is not testing NHS staff, and even abandoned all together for a period of time.
|
Quote:
The government has no interest in dragging this out or otherwise cocking it up. Everybody's an expert bar the poor bugger who has to do the job... |
Quote:
It seems to me that getting a supply of equipment from a supplier who is offering it to recipients who need it is something that should take a few days at most to sort out. That said, this report suggests that millions of home testing kits will be available in the UK within the week, if they are validated as being effective. |
Quote:
Presumably he will treat it with homeopathy and alternate medicine? [/sarcasm] |
Quote:
This virus is obviously so trendy that only rich and famous people can catch it and need to be tested. Us plebs just get the flu. |
Quote:
|
In the UK off-licences have been added to the list of essential shops:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52033260 (link currently borked) |
Not sure if this has been shared yet:
Q: What do you call a libertarian in a pandemic? A: |
G7 leaders can't agree on coronavirus statement because Pompeo pushing to call it "Wuhan virus"
https://thehill.com/policy/internati...atement-report |
Quote:
There needs to be some pragmatism here. The first cases of what was to be called Covid 19 were identified in December 2019. By the end of January the Chinese had sequenced and released the RNA of the novel corona virus. This was the first date when testing kits could start being developed. We are less than 8 weeks on. In that time they have to have been developed validated and mass produced to a high standard. The machines that do the test have a limited number of tests they can do at a time. They take several hours to do the test. The number of machines has been increasing around the country. But there are still limits on the test, do you just test well but worried NHS staff or do you test patients? You cannot do both. I do have an issue with our local system the scientists doing the tests aren't doing runs overnight, I think they could do so and double our local capacity but this seems to fall foul of some long standing union / employer issue. We are getting a new machine next week that should quadruple our capacity, but the companies making the analysers are having to cope with a surge of demands globally. There is not enough high level PPE kit for everyone for everything. I don't think that some of the people sounding off on twitter know what they are talking about. You do not need to dress up in a space suit to take blood from a covid positive patient who is not coughing or sneezing. Yes some health care staff have caught covid, but it is just as likely they caught it from social interaction like most people, as at work when they are being cautious. Yes it is good to test as many people as possible but if you look at the numbers tested they are not orders different across countries. The testing is being ramped up but for highly sophisticated and entirely novel tests that takes time. Just think what a disaster it would be if a widely unreliable test was rushed in to please the media. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Reportedly, the Coronavirus test being used by the NHS is only 75%-80% accurate. Even after 2 or 3 tests, there's still a reasonable chance that someone positive could still test negative.
|
And more idiocy from the President of Mexico:''
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-life-as-usual He's the left wing answer to right wing Moron in Brazil. And more proof that Populist are bad news, no matter left or right. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2015-22, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.