I remember seeing an interview with Niels Harrit where he was asked to clarify how much energy this 'supposedly energetic' material released in comparison to burning, I think it was paper. Harrit said that '...time is a factor.' that is to say, the speed at which the energy is released is more important to considerations about how much damage it will do than the actual figure of how much energy will be released.
At the time I came up with an analogy that if someone were to tap you lightly on the head 2000 times a day for 30 years it wouldn't do you any harm but a single punch in the face would, even though it would surely have less energy than the 30 years worth of taps on the head added together. Is this line of reasoning valid?
No, it is BS from Harrit.
Your analogy is BS for WTC fires, as you can see people jumped instead of letting their skin burn from across the room; have you been in fire, my fellow air force crew-members have, and they said their skin started to burn from a distance, and they were not in the fire; it was a jet fuel fire. There is no TAP lightly with out of control office fires, it is the full blown "Punch In The Face", and office fire is not a tap, it is the real Punch. Harrit lies about thermite, he has no evidence and his paper proves it.
How did the people Harrit can't name plant the thermite? Go ahead explain the on the fence BS theory on how the thermite was planted in the exactly place where the aircraft hit. Where is the line of reasoning for planting the thermite? How did you get your thermite next to the steel?
WTC had the heat enegy of 8,000,000,000,000 joules in WTC 1, and this is why the WTC collapsed. You can fall for Harrit's BS, but it will not make the fantasy of thermite true. Thermite is one of the top stupid claims by the nuts in 911 truth.
BS, the speed of release means the WTC should have fallen instantly, yet it took the same time it would take office fires to cause the failure. OOPS, I told you Harrit was not very good at this. Why did it take so long for the thermite to make the WTC fall? Why does the time to collapse match the time it take office fire to come up with the required heat?
WTC fires were equal in heat to 2,700 Tons of thermite, not pound, tons.
8,000,000,000,000 joules of heat in WTC 1, and 3,000,000,000,000 joules in WTC 2.
Please explain to me why the thermite took so long to work, and why would there be thermite in the dust? Do you realize thermite burns quickly?
If they, the fantasy evil guys Jones and Harrit can't name, waited as long as it took the office fires to start the collapse, then the fuse for the thermite would be burned up, and the thermite would never be set off, ;;; OH< that is why the thermite is in the dust, it never went off. Darn...
You have fallen for the dumbed down lie of thermite, and don't understand there was no thermite used on 911. There was no way to get the thermite next to the steel on 911, or before 911. Thus, the office fires are much for effective at heating the WTC steel than thermite; you see, there were fires, the biggest fires in history, the first time fires were not fought, and water system was broke by the impacts. Ignore reality and believe the liars.
Does thermite cause the shell of the WTC to bow in? Does this magic Harrit thermite suck in the walls? Explain why zero evidence of thermite damage was found. Please show me where Jones an Harrit explain why no steel has damage from thermite? You can't.
Where did the evil doers Jones and Harrit can't name get the suck in the shell thermite?
How does thermite suck in the WTC walls? Please explain what your experts say.
Your analogy sucks, if someone taps someone 2000 times a day, the person tapping will be beat to pulp, at tap 2. But go ahead tap someone 2,000 times a day. But the analogy sucks for a fire, unless you are saying the fire as one small match at a time. Very bad analogy, you don't understand fire, and how crazy Harrit is.
Unless your on the fence thermite is right on the steel, it will fizzle out in seconds.
BTW, where is the thermite PRODUCTS? Thermite leaves iron behind, not iron spheres, but piles of iron, it is used to weld steel rails together, it leaves iron. Where is the iron?
How many tons of thermite does Harrit use in his fantasy thermite theory? Did Harrit and Jones do any math?
If you are on the fence for thermite, you may as well go for Moon landing hoax, Bigfoot and more. Read the paper, and explain to me how thermite they found can have less energy than thermite.
Why does the DSC not match? Why does Harrit lie and claim they have iron after the reaction and they show a spectrum for iron oxide?
911 truth has no valid claims. The fence is getting too tall to be on. 13 years of no evidence, has been my typing practice for years. And you better be watching basketball as you post, or something; there is much to much to do to waste time posting about lies from 911, unless you are doing something else the same time. ESPN replay is my posting buddy - Maryland won over Michigan.
Your analogy is better for a 180 mph aircraft impact on the WTC, which would have the plane, most the plane falling to the ground; the WTC steel shell was strong, as it held 50 percent of the WTC load, and was responsible for the lateral support of the WTC. The only reason the WTC collapsed was due to high speed impacts. If they had been doing the speed limit of 250 knots below 10,000 feet, the WTC would have stopped the attack at the shell, and we would see all those things the follower of 911 truth wanted; aircraft parts which look like aircraft parts, a big tail section sitting on the NYC road next to the WTC... etc
