Originally Posted by
Robert Harris
You are aware I presume, that every nonvictim in the limo reported closely bunched shots at the end, or after events that were well after 223.
And do you realize, that according to the Warren Commission, "most" of the witnesses agreed with the passengers, reporting "closely bunched" shots at the end of the attack.
Simply making your same claims over and over doesn't make them better.
Still waiting for you to rebut my arguments here: Two shots, at Z223, Z313, and a sound of impact of the final shot on the skull, exactly as testified to by John Connally and Clint Hill. And as you conceded earlier, that's exactly what Connally said he heard (just a reminder in case you were thinking of backtracking).
Those three sounds would account for the three shots as described by the vast majority of witnesses, AND the bunching the majority described - without invoking multiple unseen shooters who left no evidence (nor any pink unicorns either). I also don't have to believe hearsay that surfaced 30-years-after the fact, nor that much of the first-day evidence was somehow magically replaced by the third day because I can find some memo to take a paragraph out of context.
I think you're seeing where I'm going with this.
Hank