View Single Post
Old 4th December 2015, 05:12 PM   #24
stevea
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,031
Originally Posted by Dancing David View Post
that article is very silly it basically takes some QM and then spins a fairy tale out of it.
But only a very silly fairy tale - that ignores all the conventional means of defining time. There is nothing 'biocentric" about the Heisenberg principal, it's simply a tautology about physical information.

There is no question that there is more to learn about the quantum nature of time, as well as the limitation of an anthropomorphic viewpoint of physics - but Lanza seems heavily invested in promoting a 'voo-doo' position with zero backing evidence.

If his theories are 'scientific'(testable), then as a scientist he should propose a means to test them. Otherwise they are religion & mysticism.
stevea is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top