Originally Posted by Jabba
And I explained in detail which was the inference and which was the observation and why each merits the label I applied. Do not pretend I said or implied otherwise. Do not pretend my statement "somehow" defends your argument.
No, do not resort to word games. The words mean what I say they do, and they convey the appropriate meanings in my argument.
You have no evidence. You are pitting conjecture against observation. You are pitting inference against observation. You have absurdly tried to excuse your lack of evidence with the further speculation that it's invisible. That's just silly.
Yes. And you need to explain it in a way that doesn't try to redefine words. That's just another way to shift the goalposts.