Trump runs for POTUS / Trumped Up! Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
cullennz said:
Trump is going to let in new London Mayor

Even though he is one of those nasty muslims

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...-london-mayor-sadiq-khan-exception-muslim-ban
Click to expand...

Mayor Khan's response probably comes under the heading of stating the obvious but given the stupidity level of the Trump campaign it had to be said out loud:

...In response, the new London mayor said: "This isn't just about me - it's about my friends, my family and everyone who comes from a background similar to mine, anywhere in the world."

He added: "Donald Trump's ignorant view of Islam could make both our countries less safe - it risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the world and plays in to the hands of the extremists.

"Donald Trump and those around him think that western liberal values are incompatible with mainstream Islam - London has proved him wrong."
Click to expand...

Above from the BBC article:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36256087
 
Ladewig said:
I get calling her Crooked Hillary or Documented-liar Hillary, or even Criminal Hillary. I suppose I could even deal with Killer Clinton. But what's the deal about mocking her for wearing a pantsuit? That is consider business wear. A pantsuit is the female equivalent of a men's business suit. Clinton didn't create that equivalency, Clinton didn't invent the pantsuit. There is no reason to mock her for dressing appropriately as a senator, a secretary of state, and a presidential hopeful.
Click to expand...

He's been at it a while ...
Slings and Arrows said:
Hillary is the reincarnation of Richard Nixon. Their only difference is that Nixon was better dressed. With all of her millions from speaking fees, you would think she could buy something appropriate to wear.

It doesn't convey a presidential image when she's dressed in an outdated, ill-fitting pantsuit. My 92 year old grandmother is more stylish and has better fashion sense than 68 year old Hillary.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/696355724f2a46388b.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...
 
tyr_13 said:
Wait, people are mocking her for wearing pantsuit (which is just a business suit worn by a woman in most cases), and not for wearing some pantsuits which are as ugly as the ties that Trump wears every day? Ok, now I see where the sexism accusation in regards to her fashion has merit. I didn't connect the dots until now.

In my defense, that dot connection requires thinking like a remarkably foolish person.
Click to expand...

The one's who think Hillary isn't fair game for ridicule are the real sexists.

I believe Trump's hair has been an object of ridicule from some people. His tiny hands. His orange skin. Hillary's attire is certainly open to the same type of ridicule.

I can't remember it ever being considered bad to make fun of a politician's looks. Why start now?
 
I am so upset about Trump I cannot post in the thread anymore. Twice today I had to navigate away and leave unposted paragraphs of sarcasm and sky-falling tirades. If he gets elected, I'll have to go offline altogether, forcryingoutloud.
 
tyr_13 said:
Wait, people are mocking her for wearing pantsuit (which is just a business suit worn by a woman in most cases), and not for wearing some pantsuits which are as ugly as the ties that Trump wears every day? Ok, now I see where the sexism accusation in regards to her fashion has merit.
Click to expand...

How?

I get that it's a stupid point to make against her, but why is it sexist? People laugh at Trump's hair all the time (ETA: Ninja'd).
 
Argumemnon said:
How?

I get that it's a stupid point to make against her, but why is it sexist? People laugh at Trump's hair all the time (ETA: Ninja'd).
Click to expand...

It's not just the pants suit, it's the all too often double standard. Politics as usual for Clinton is more shrill, more corrupt, more dishonest yadda yadda but it you look at the facts 95% of what she's condemned for goes unnoticed about male politicians. Who else is judged by their wife's acts? What other Senator or Secretary of State is accused of only getting the position because of knowing someone.**

**They did the same with Obama, he must have gotten into Harvard because of affirmative action.:rolleyes:

The same was claimed about Elizabeth Warren in her 2012 election.

We do have GW being accused of getting a cush job in the National Guard to get out of going to Vietnam but that's different, it was attributing his success to privilege and it was getting out of military service. And I think there was plenty of evidence GW had an alumni nepotism advantage getting into Yale, but again, there are differences in that it is a specific accusation rather than an accusation based on a generalization: gender or race.
 
Last edited:
The Trump campaign accidentally submitted William Johnson as a CA delegate. Johnson is the white nationalist who was in the news for doing robo calls supporting Trump.

Johnson had a moment of clarity recently:

Johnson said:
For many, many years, when I would say these things, other white people would call me names: 'Oh, you're a hatemonger, you're a Nazi, you're like Hitler,' " he confessed. "Now they come in and say, 'Oh, you're like Donald Trump.' "
Click to expand...
 
Argumemnon said:
To be fair, no one's wife has ever been President.



So... not sexist, then?
Click to expand...
In Obama's case, racist. In Warren's case, sexist. In GW's case, privilege.

You can investigate the details. They'll confirm what I'm saying.

Anyone that thinks there isn't an undercurrent of sexism tainting how people view Clinton creating a double standard isn't paying attention or is in denial.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
In Obama's case, racist. In Warren's case, sexist. In GW's case, privilege.
Click to expand...

Wow, that is so convenient. No matter who the target is, someone will find a reason why it's bigotry and has nothing to do with their individual actions and choices.

Anyone that thinks there isn't an undercurrent of sexism tainting how people view Clinton creating a double standard isn't paying attention or is in denial.
Click to expand...

And again. This is basically your entire argument: if you don't see it, you're in denial. Do I need to explain to you why that's a fallacy?
 
Argumemnon said:
Wow, that is so convenient. No matter who the target is, someone will find a reason why it's bigotry and has nothing to do with their individual actions and choices.
Click to expand...
So you think we can only have one? If there's any racism there can't be sexism or nepotism? :rolleyes: If Obama had to deal with racism, Clinton couldn't possibly have to deal with sexism?

I'm flabbergasted you would think that! They are manifest in distinctly different ways you know.

And again. This is basically your entire argument: if you don't see it, you're in denial. Do I need to explain to you why that's a fallacy?
Click to expand...
When it's that blatant, yes.

Once again, you are not riding on the same track as I ride on. People that deny sexism or racism has affected the double standards applied to both Clinton and Obama are indeed ignoring reality.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
The same was claimed about Elizabeth Warren in her 2012 election.
Click to expand...


I'm curious to know if Elizabeth Warren, the only Native American (Cherokee) currently serving in the US Senate, was deeply offended by Hillary's recent insensitive remarks:

"I have a lot of experience dealing with men who sometimes get off the reservation." -- Crooked Hillary

The former Senator from Colorado, Ben Nighthorse Campbell, was unavailable for comment.

Reference:
Elizabeth Warren Native American / Cherokee Controversy
Trump is right about Elizabeth Warren’s Native American problem
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
I'm curious to know if Elizabeth Warren, the only Native American (Cherokee) currently serving in the US Senate, was deeply offended by Hillary's recent insensitive remarks:

"I have a lot of experience dealing with men who sometimes get off the reservation." -- Crooked Hillary

The former Senator from Colorado, Ben Nighthorse Campbell, was unavailable for comment.
Click to expand...


I suppose that Elizabeth Warren is 1/8 Cherokee and 7/8 European.

I am 1/8 Asian and 7/8 European, and Elizabeth Warren looks whiter than I do.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
In Obama's case, racist. In Warren's case, sexist. In GW's case, privilege.
Click to expand...

In Warren's case, it was about racism against fake Native Americans - a woefully underrepresented ethnicity at Harvard Law School. Well, before she got there, and again now that she's left.
 
Maya22 said:
I suppose that Elizabeth Warren is 1/8 Cherokee and 7/8 European.

I am 1/8 Asian and 7/8 European, and Elizabeth Warren looks whiter than I do.
Click to expand...

Elizabeth Warren's ancestry is pretty well-documented. She has zero Native American blood unless one of her great great mi-maws went off the reservation on the reservation, if you know what I mean - nudge nudge. Warren does apparently have a great great great grandfather who helped drive the Cherokee along on the Trail of Tears though. So that's sort of related to Indians I guess.
 
mgidm86 said:
The one's who think Hillary isn't fair game for ridicule are the real sexists.
Click to expand...

Not what I said.

Argumemnon said:
How?

I get that it's a stupid point to make against her, but why is it sexist? People laugh at Trump's hair all the time (ETA: Ninja'd).
Click to expand...

I see you're stuck like I was. It isn't that they're criticizing or making fun of her suits, it's that some are making fun of her wearing suits. It isn't like saying Trump's ties are ugly and far too long, it would be like saying, 'the man wears suits'. The implication is 'suits aren't for men'. In Hillary's case it's 'women shouldn't wear suits'. It's such a stupid and sexist way of thinking that I had not considered it. Then I guess the thread 'Why Women Shouldn't Wear Pants' and the posts in this thread made me realize that yes, for some it is indeed the fact that a woman is wearing a suit.

If a man was a hair stylist, and he kept taking **** for wearing an apron of the hair stylist type, that would be sexist as well. What's he doing? Why not a leather one that holds tools! Well, 'real' tools! Those previous sentences are in the style of a real tool by the way.

Now of course not every criticism of her appearance is sexist. In fact I bet most are not. However, the nature of some do seem very, very sexist now. Of course they get the convenient cover of now claiming 'oh, I just mean they're ugly'. However, note how many weren't complaining about ugly suits, but simply 'pantsuits'. It's not inherently sexist to mock her appearance, but that in no way means that any given mockery isn't sexist.
 
What's with the Warren/Native American thing being constantly brought up? Man, the conservatives here really have so little to talk **** about that it's still being brought up in a Trump thread.
 
sunmaster14 said:
In Warren's case, it was about racism against fake Native Americans - a woefully underrepresented ethnicity at Harvard Law School. Well, before she got there, and again now that she's left.
Click to expand...

You're assuming the claim ticking Native American on a form is the only thing that was claimed in the 'there but for affirmative action go I". It's not like that is the only thing negative ever said about her or that the Native American was the actual issue.

If Warren had been a full blown Native American and had been accused of only getting ahead because she was Native American, that would of course be racism.

But that isn't what was claimed. What was claimed was, she wasn't qualified [fill in your reasoning here] and used an unfair tactic to move ahead. Why wasn't she judged qualified if it wasn't being Native American?

‘Boston Herald’ vs. Elizabeth Warren: Will Sexism Win?
The prime offender has been longtime columnist Howie Carr, who by one count has referred to Warren as “Granny” at least sixteen times since this past February. His new column today, in fact, puts it right in the headline: “Keeping up with Granny Ain’t Easy.” After several paragraphs of scorn (including the standard she-wants-to-destroy-capitalism) he calls her Lieawatha and “the fake Indian.”
Click to expand...

What the Second Brown-Warren Debate Says About Gender in Politics
Brown appeared unnecessarily combative Monday night -- most notably cutting Warren off at one point with "I am not a student in your classroom," which drew boos from the crowd.

The contrast between Brown and Warren's demeanors was pretty stark. She has a smart, soft-spoken, Midwestern style. So the somewhat mean, macho Brown offensive attack felt like overkill and a replay of the approach he took two years ago in his race against Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley. Brown used a similar line on Coakley -- telling her, "I'm not in your courtroom. I'm not a defendant" -- during a debate.
Click to expand...
That doesn't mean male candidates are never condescending to male opponents. One need only look at Trump's "little Marco" to find an example. But just because condescension occurs doesn't mean racism or sexism is not playing a part in it sometimes.
 
tyr_13 said:
What's with the Warren/Native American thing being constantly brought up? Man, the conservatives here really have so little to talk **** about that it's still being brought up in a Trump thread.
Click to expand...

It's an attempt to discount Warren's academic qualifications.
 
tyr_13 said:
What's with the Warren/Native American thing being constantly brought up? Man, the conservatives here really have so little to talk **** about that it's still being brought up in a Trump thread.
Click to expand...

Well, first of all SG brought it up. Second, Trump has been feuding with Warren and has mocked her fake Native American heritage. Third, it's so funny that it will never get old. I could be wrong, though. I've been told by Fuzzyslippers that I don't have a sense of humorour, so what do I know?
 
tyr_13 said:
What's with the Warren/Native American thing being constantly brought up? Man, the conservatives here really have so little to talk **** about that it's still being brought up in a Trump thread.
Click to expand...


Elizabeth Warren has been waging a vicious Twitter attack on Donald Trump for some time now, which intensified the day he became the presumptive nominee. Here is a small sample of her tweets:

"I'm going to fight my heart out to make sure Donald Trump's toxic stew of hatred and insecurity never reaches the White House."

"There is more enthusiasm for Donald Trump among leaders of the KKK than leaders of the party he now controls."

"Here is what is real: Donald Trump has built his campaign on racism, sexism, and xenophobia."

"Donald Trump's racism, sexism, and xenophobia doesn't drive me nuts. It makes me sick."

Read more of her tweets:
@ElizabethWarren

Trump, who is known for hitting back 10 times as hard, finally responded in kind by bringing up her Native American farce at a recent rally (broadcast to the entire nation by Fox News). Warren immediately stopped, and she has been completely silent ever since May 6th.
 
Last edited:
Skeptic Ginger said:
So you think we can only have one? If there's any racism there can't be sexism or nepotism? :rolleyes: If Obama had to deal with racism, Clinton couldn't possibly have to deal with sexism?

I'm flabbergasted you would think that!
Click to expand...

I'd be flabbergasted, too, if I had your ability to misconstrue Argumemnon's posts like that.

Once again, you are not riding on the same track as I ride on. People that deny sexism or racism has affected the double standards applied to both Clinton and Obama are indeed ignoring reality.
Click to expand...

Just like atheists are denying obvious evidence for god's existence, and skeptics are denying obvious evidence for 9/11 conspiracies. Saying something is obvious is not an argument, and you'd never accept it from anyone you disagree with.
 
tyr_13 said:
It isn't that they're criticizing or making fun of her suits, it's that some are making fun of her wearing suits. It isn't like saying Trump's ties are ugly and far too long, it would be like saying, 'the man wears suits'. The implication is 'suits aren't for men'.
Click to expand...

Is there any actual evidence for this? Plenty of women wear suits.

Now of course not every criticism of her appearance is sexist.
Click to expand...

Oh, I'm sure it is, to some people. How can a reasonable person tell the difference, without any convincing argument?
 
Argumemnon said:
I'd be flabbergasted, too, if I had your ability to misconstrue Argumemnon's posts like that.

Just like atheists are denying obvious evidence for god's existence, and skeptics are denying obvious evidence for 9/11 conspiracies. Saying something is obvious is not an argument, and you'd never accept it from anyone you disagree with.
Click to expand...
:jaw-dropp

Dude, I've told you before and here's another example, your brain doesn't work like mine. We run on different tracks and I can't have a rational discussion with you because ... different tracks.


Racism and sexism are obvious!!!!! They exist. I can't help that you don't know that. There is no obvious evidence that gods exist.

You have to start in at least the same reality to have a discussion.
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
Elizabeth Warren has been waging a vicious Twitter attack on Donald Trump for some time now, which intensified the day he became the presumptive nominee. Here is a small sample of her tweets:

"I'm going to fight my heart out to make sure Donald Trump's toxic stew of hatred and insecurity never reaches the White House."

"There is more enthusiasm for Donald Trump among leaders of the KKK than leaders of the party he now controls."

"Here is what is real: Donald Trump has built his campaign on racism, sexism, and xenophobia."

"Donald Trump's racism, sexism, and xenophobia doesn't drive me nuts. It makes me sick."

Read more of her tweets:
@ElizabethWarren

Trump, who is known for hitting back 10 times as hard, finally responded in kind by bringing up her Native American farce at a recent rally (broadcast to the entire nation by Fox News). Warren immediately stopped, and she has been completely silent ever since May 6th.
Click to expand...

If you think 'being wrong about native American ancestry' is 'hitting back ten times as hard' as far as criticisms go, then your priorities are askew.

Argumemnon said:
Is there any actual evidence for this? Plenty of women wear suits.
Click to expand...

I'm not clear as to what you're asking. Yes, plenty of women wear suits...therefore people wouldn't be so foolish as to attack a woman for wearing suits? Because that does not follow.

So, what are you asking evidence for, and what kind of evidence would satisfy you?



Oh, I'm sure it is, to some people. How can a reasonable person tell the difference, without any convincing argument?
Click to expand...


Well if you don't find my explanation as to the existence of the phenomena in general convincing, you'll not find any 'reasonable' way to tell the difference. Furthermore, the ability to tell in any specific case if it's the cause doesn't discount our ability to find it an extant phenomena. I don't think there's much need to tell in specific cases anyway.

It's much like how some of the opposition to Obama had racist connotations and motives. How can we know for sure in any specific case? That's rather difficult ('hey, people called Bush a monkey too!'), but to a reasonable person, it's indisputable that indeed, there was racist opposition to Obama and some criticisms were racist even if not done by people who are generally racist.
 
varwoche said:
The Trump campaign accidentally submitted William Johnson as a CA delegate. Johnson is the white nationalist who was in the news for doing robo calls supporting Trump.

Johnson had a moment of clarity recently:
Click to expand...

I'm not saying that all Trump supporters are racists. But it certainly does appear that the racists really love Trump.
(Kinda like how not all Muslims are terrorists, but it sure seems like a lot of the terrorists are Muslims.)

Trump campaign approves white nationalist as GOP delegate after 'database error'

The Trump campaign submitted the name of William Johnson, the head of the American Freedom Party who funded pro-Trump robocalls that talked of the white race "dying out in America," to the California secretary of state. Johnson is one of 169 delegates -- 159 from congressional districts and 10 at-large delegates -- that voters in each of California's congressional districts would send to the GOP's nominating convention this summer by voting for Trump.
Johnson said he received an email from a California strategist with Trump's campaign late Tuesday afternoon stating that he had been listed in error.

The story was first reported Tuesday by Mother Jones.

In a telephone interview with CNN, Johnson said he understood that "a campaign has to put its best foot forward — and I'm a white nationalist, and we live in a society today where white people don't like white people who like white people. And so, I don't want to do anything that would jeopardize Mr. Trump's chances. So it's best that I resign."

The Trump campaign on Tuesday blamed Johnson's inclusion on its California delegate slate on a "database error."
Click to expand...

So they know that publicly Trump can't been seen explicitly courting their vote or having them work for the campaign or as a delegate, but there's a wink-and-a-nod thing going on here. It's no accident that these groups are head-over-heels for Trump. I do realize you can't always blame a candidate for the people who endorse or support him, but I do think he has subtly or maybe not-so-subtly said some things that would be likely to appeal to those types. I've also heard that he is very popular with Stormfront, David Duke and the KKK.

White supremacist groups see Trump bump
'He has sparked an insurgency,' Stormfront founder says.

By Ben Schreckinger

12/10/15 05:15 AM EST

The Ku Klux Klan is using Donald Trump as a talking point in its outreach efforts. Stormfront, the most prominent American white supremacist website, is upgrading its servers in part to cope with a Trump traffic spike. And former Louisiana Rep. David Duke reports that the businessman has given more Americans cover to speak out loud about white nationalism than at any time since his own political campaigns in the 1990s.

As hate group monitors at the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League warn that Trump’s rhetoric is conducive to anti-Muslim violence, white nationalist leaders are capitalizing on his candidacy to invigorate and expand their movement.

“Demoralization has been the biggest enemy and Trump is changing all that,” said Stormfront founder Don Black, who reports additional listeners and call volume to his phone-in radio show, in addition to the site’s traffic bump. Black predicts that the white nationalist forces set in motion by Trump will be a legacy that outlives the businessman’s political career. “He’s certainly creating a movement that will continue independently of him even if he does fold at some point.”

Trump does not belong to or endorse white supremacist groups. He has said that he does not need or want Duke’s endorsement and his campaign has fired two staffers over racist posts on social media. A man displaying a Confederate flag was ejected from a Trump rally in Virginia earlier this month.
Click to expand...


Klan Leader Endorses Trump for President



“I think Donald Trump would be best for the job,” said the Imperial Wizard. "The reason a lot of Klan members like Donald Trump is because a lot of what he believes in, we believe in. We want our country to be safe."

The Imperial Wizard said he supports Trump’s calls to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States.

"If Donald Trump dropped out tomorrow I would support Kasich before I would Ted Cruz because he is not an American citizen,” said the Imperial Wizard. “Even if I agree with some of the things that Ted Cruz says, I would not support him because he was born in Canada. He is not an American citizen."
Click to expand...
 
varwoche said:
The Trump campaign accidentally submitted William Johnson as a CA delegate. Johnson is the white nationalist who was in the news for doing robo calls supporting Trump.

Johnson had a moment of clarity recently:
Click to expand...

It may be too late for them to remove him as a delegate:

Trump Campaign Corresponded With Its White Nationalist Delegate Long After "Database Error"

In an update to the story, it turns out that it already past the statutory deadline for campaigns to submit their lists of delegates, so he may not be able to be replaced, unless they bend the rules.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Elizabeth Warren has been waging a vicious Twitter attack on Donald Trump for some time now, which intensified the day he became the presumptive nominee. Here is a small sample of her tweets:

"I'm going to fight my heart out to make sure Donald Trump's toxic stew of hatred and insecurity never reaches the White House."

"There is more enthusiasm for Donald Trump among leaders of the KKK than leaders of the party he now controls."

"Here is what is real: Donald Trump has built his campaign on racism, sexism, and xenophobia."

"Donald Trump's racism, sexism, and xenophobia doesn't drive me nuts. It makes me sick."

Read more of her tweets:
@ElizabethWarren

Trump, who is known for hitting back 10 times as hard, finally responded in kind by bringing up her Native American farce at a recent rally (broadcast to the entire nation by Fox News). Warren immediately stopped, and she has been completely silent ever since May 6th.
Click to expand...


If you think Trump got the better off that exchange, you're more far gone than I thought.
 
tyr_13 said:
I see you're stuck like I was. It isn't that they're criticizing or making fun of her suits, it's that some are making fun of her wearing suits. It isn't like saying Trump's ties are ugly and far too long, it would be like saying, 'the man wears suits'. The implication is 'suits aren't for men'.

Argumemnon said:
Is there any actual evidence for this? Plenty of women wear suits.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I consider the following quote to be an example of mocking a professional women for wearing professional clothes.

Slings and Arrows said:
Let that sink in for a moment. In the battleground states, Trump is the one winning the gender war.

This has to be devastating news for Crooked Hillary's pantsuit brigade.
Click to expand...

............
Dr. Keith said:
Some people have never walked into a board room with women over the age of 30. It's not their fault. They don't know what a female C-level executive looks like.

In my experience, very few c-level executives wear a skirt. Male or female.
Click to expand...

I agree very much with your post. However I will go even farther and say that if a Secretary of State in a foreign country knows that she will be photographed by local and international photographers from the moment she leaves the hotel to the moment she returns, then she would prefer a pants suit because there will be fewer accidental "upskirt" photos. Also getting out of automobiles is easier for a SoS in a pantsuit.
 
Last edited:
NoahFence said:
If you think Trump got the better off that exchange, you're more far gone than I thought.
Click to expand...


Prior to this episode, I had never heard the story of Elizabeth Warren's ancestry; nor did I have any interest in knowing about her ancestry.

But once she began to attack Trump on a daily basis (insinuating he is a KKK member; a flat-out lie), I began to take notice.

Finally, Trump decided enough is enough, and went for the jugular. He drew national attention to Warren's phony claim that she is a Cherokee; and even gave her a new nickname: "Goofy Liz".

Warren was once the darling of the left, but now she's just a crazy lady who tells everyone she's Native American.

And in case you missed it, Warren has gone from a daily flurry of tweets to stone cold silence. She crawled back underneath her rock, hopefully, never to be heard from again.

Reference:
Warren's Twitter tantrum ratchets up rhetoric -- Boston Herald, May 7th
 
Last edited:
It's so much easier for a bloke.

Choices - suit

Females

300 options that someone will find inappropriate

(Slight exaggeration)
 
tyr_13 said:
So, what are you asking evidence for, and what kind of evidence would satisfy you?
Click to expand...

Let's start by seeing some. I'm not asking for anecdotes, either. There are plenty of sexists in the world, so I'm sure you can find them. I'm asking for some sort of support for Ginger's claim.

It's much like how some of the opposition to Obama had racist connotations and motives.
Click to expand...

I agree that some of Obama's opposition was racist, and I think much of it was, but it's hard to be sure because it's not like we have solid evidence; American politics has become so polarized that the GOP would probably oppose any Democrat as staunchly.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
...

But once she began to attack Trump on a daily basis (insinuating he is a KKK member; a flat-out lie), I began to take notice.

Finally, Trump decided enough is enough, and went for the jugular. He drew national attention to Warren's phony claim that she is a Cherokee; and even gave her a new nickname: "Goofy Liz".

And in case you missed it, Warren has gone from a daily flurry of tweets to stone cold silence. She crawled back underneath her rock, hopefully, never to be heard from again.
Click to expand...

You're about as good at representing facts as Trump is.

Warren frequently takes long to longish breaks between twitter visits, tweeting on 31 Mar, 8 Apr, 10 Apr, 29 Apr, 4 May, 7 May. Neither were her flurries daily, nor would a 4 day absence suggest crawling under a rock.

Feel free to demonstrate where "Goofy Liz" (srsly?) has insinuated that Trump is a KKK member, or even, for that matter, that an insinuation is a flat-out lie.

As for the Cherokee story. Once again, it's really just another of the cheap shots that are a distinct marker of both his personality and campaign.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...zabeth-warren-native-american-or-what/257415/

and of course, you 'only began to take notice' at x point. :rolleyes:
 
TofuFighter said:
Warren frequently takes long to longish breaks between twitter visits, tweeting on 31 Mar, 8 Apr, 10 Apr, 29 Apr, 4 May, 7 May. Neither were her flurries daily, nor would a 4 day absence suggest crawling under a rock.
Click to expand...


I shouldn't have said "rock", Goofy Liz went back to her tepee after a long day of hunting buffalo.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Prior to this episode, I had never heard the story of Elizabeth Warren's ancestry; nor did I have any interest in knowing about her ancestry.

But once she began to attack Trump on a daily basis (insinuating he is a KKK member; a flat-out lie), I began to take notice.
Click to expand...

Yea, Trump was never in the KKK. Although his father was, and he is 100% approved by David Duke, and he asked a white supremacist to be a delegate. But since he was never IN the KKK, it's all good in the hood.

Gotcha.

Finally, Trump decided enough is enough, and went for the jugular. He drew national attention to Warren's phony claim that she is a Cherokee; and even gave her a new nickname: "Goofy Liz".
Click to expand...

LOL Yea, he went for the jugular alright. Too bad he came up with air and totally missed the target, as usual. That buffoon couldn't intellectually hang with Senator Warren if she was drugged into unconsciousness midway through the conversation.

Warren was once the darling of the left, but now she's just a crazy lady who tells everyone she's Native American.
Click to expand...

No, she's still pretty popular. Although to be honest, nobody was expecting you or any other Trump lackey to acknowledge reality.

And in case you missed it, Warren has gone from a daily flurry of tweets to stone cold silence. She crawled back underneath her rock, hopefully, never to be heard from again.
Click to expand...

Or maybe she's doing that "governing" thing we here in Mass. hired her to do.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
I'm curious to know if Elizabeth Warren, the only Native American (Cherokee) currently serving in the US Senate, was deeply offended by Hillary's recent insensitive remarks:

"I have a lot of experience dealing with men who sometimes get off the reservation." -- Crooked Hillary

The former Senator from Colorado, Ben Nighthorse Campbell, was unavailable for comment.

Reference:
Elizabeth Warren Native American / Cherokee Controversy
Trump is right about Elizabeth Warren’s Native American problem
Click to expand...

I'm curious to know if Elizabeth Warren, the only Native American (Cherokee) currently serving in the US Senate, was deeply offended by Slings and Arrows recent insensitive remarks:

"Goofy Liz went back to her tepee after a long day of hunting buffalo." -- Slings and Arrows

The former Senator from Colorado, Ben Nighthorse Campbell, was unavailable for comment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom