The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Fusion needs enormous pressures and temperatures, not just "velocities"

jeffreyw said:
...where the velocities for fusion are occurring.
Click to expand...
Missed this ignorance: 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Fusion needs enormous pressures and temperatures, not just "velocities".
It is the temperature that give atoms high velocities.
It is the pressures that give a high density so the high velocity atoms have a chance to collide and fuse.

Hercules A has a couple of galaxy plasma jets in very thin plasma - the inter-galactic medium.
 
Last edited:
Reality Check said:
jeffreyw: 58 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015 includes your delusion about "birthing galaxies" :jaw-dropp!

27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Unable to support his idea rationally with evidence so he has to resort to gibberish and insults.
Gibberish of random numbers.
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited response to moderated content


And implies yet again that Hercules A is a star (making 3 lies about it?) :eek:!
Click to expand...

So really. I need to collect all the insults I've received over the past few years?

You can't hold a candle grasshopper. That's not a battle you can win. Try again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reality Check said:
Missed this ignorance: 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Fusion needs enormous pressures and temperatures, not just "velocities".
It is the temperature that give atoms high velocities.
It is the pressures that give a high density so the high velocity atoms have a chance to collide and fuse.

Hercules A has a couple of galaxy plasma jets in very thin plasma - the inter-galactic medium.
Click to expand...

Temperature is the velocity of a gas.

Who's ignorant?

It doesn't matter making statements with you though. Are you done? I'm waiting for real challengers.
 
Last edited:
jeffreyw said:
I need to collect all the insults I've received over the past few years?
Click to expand...
That you are ignorant about astronomy is a documented fact.
That you have lied occasionally is a documented fact.
That your have stuck with delusions since the beginning of this thread is a documented fact.
jeffreyw: 58 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015 includes your delusion about "birthing galaxies" :jaw-dropp!

ETA: That list is a bit charitable - your statements of ignorance about astronomy started earlier in this thread, e.g.
29 December 2014 jeffreyw: The ignorance exoplanets can be seen by eye when the "exo" part means outside of the Solar System!
And even earlier according to the "Over this three years" you have been presenting the planets are stars delusion.
29 December 2016 jeffreyw: The ignorant assertion that stellar system formation is "dark matter, spacetime warping, big bang creationism". (with some posts in Abandon All Hope for some reason)

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited response to moderated content
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Unable to support his idea rationally with evidence so he has to resort to gibberish and insults.
I called you ignorant and deluded because you have stated ignorance and delusions. You can show that you are not ignorant or deluded, e.g.
  • learn about and acknowledge the physics that shows that stars are fusion powered
  • show that you understand that stars do not magically lose mass to become planets and moons
  • show that you understand that stars are not made up rocks
  • show that you understand that chemistry does no change stellar material into rocks

ETA: The insults start from almost the start of the thread, e.g. the "The closed minded dogmatists (which are probably very, very many) on this forum..." post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My professional opinion as a registered nurse is that you need psychiatric help.
 
jeffreyw said:
Temperature is the velocity of a gas...
Click to expand...

Well, it's related to the average speed of the gas molecules. But you could have a very cold gas moving at a high bulk velocity.

Anyway, jefferyw, someone earlier indicated you don't accept that radioactivity is real. Is that true? I searched te thread but didn't see anything about this.
 
Jeffrey, as I understand your theory stars evolve by losing mass to become brown dwarfs, which lose mass to become gas giant planets, which lose mass to become rocky planets like the Earth, which lose mass to become smaller bodies like the moon.

With this in mind I'd be very grateful if you could help me out with a few numbers -

What is the mass loss rate of the Sun, and how long will it take to reach the same mass as a brown dwarf?
What is the mass loss rate of a typical brown dwarf and how long will it take to reach the same mass as Jupiter?
What is the mass loss rate of Jupiter and how long will it take to reach the same mass as the Earth?
What is the mass loss rate of the Earth, and how long will it take to reach the same mass as the Moon?

Thank you in advance.
 
jeffreyw said:
I have slowly realized that over the years the people in this thread have not come to terms with what is happening. I can break it down:

1. Establishment science is false dogma. They have been teaching you that stars are fusion reactors and planets are cold dead worlds that are only hot because of the left over heat of formation.

This is incorrect. A "planet" is an evolving star. This means stellar evolution is planet formation. It will be a large pill to swallow, but like antibiotics it will be good for ya.

Here is another video where I explain it very simply.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeM5pRcuOsA
Click to expand...

I have slowly realized that over the arbitrary time the people in this thread have not come to terms with what is happening. I can break it down:

1. Establishment science is false dogma. They have been teaching you that stars are fusion reactors and planets are cold dead worlds that are only hot because of the left over heat of formation.

This is incorrect. A "planet" is congealed pea soup. This means stellar evolution is actually fresh pea soup. It will be a large bowl to swallow, but like most soups it will be good for ya.
 
Shalamar said:
I have slowly realized that over the arbitrary time the people in this thread have not come to terms with what is happening. I can break it down:

1. Establishment science is false dogma. They have been teaching you that stars are fusion reactors and planets are cold dead worlds that are only hot because of the left over heat of formation.
This is incorrect. A "planet" is congealed pea soup. This means stellar evolution is actually fresh pea soup. It will be a large bowl to swallow, but like most soups it will be good for ya.
Click to expand...

(hilite added)

Don't forget the heat generated by the decay of unstable pea molecules, which we can refer to as peons.
 
Shalamar said:
This is incorrect. A "planet" is congealed pea soup. This means stellar evolution is actually fresh pea soup. It will be a large bowl to swallow, but like most soups it will be good for ya.
Click to expand...
These is strong evidence in favour of this hypothesis.
ClangersWP is a British stop-motion animated children's television series of short stories about a family of murine creatures who live on, and inside, a small moon-like planet. They speak only in whistles, and eat green soup supplied by the Soup Dragon​
 
Craig B said:
These is strong evidence in favour of this hypothesis.
ClangersWP is a British stop-motion animated children's television series of short stories about a family of murine creatures who live on, and inside, a small moon-like planet. They speak only in whistles, and eat green soup supplied by the Soup Dragon​
Click to expand...

Excellent! More evidence in favor of the pea-soup model of stellar and planetary formation!

Thank you!
 
Giordano said:
I suspect that our role in jeffreyw's performance art is not to admire, but to attempt to correct his points by providing the actual facts, so as to confirm to him that his theories are being attacked by a morally corrupt, weak, impotent, "cabal" of brain-washed academic scientists. In fact I find that I match at least one of these characterizations, although certainly not all.
Click to expand...

Almost. The fact that they don't realize they are a "cabal" is the whole point.

Fooling the academics is easy... just pump them through years of school and make sure none deviate from the dogma. Showing them they have been fooled all those years? That is impossible... at least amoung the narrow minded who are forced to earn their keep by being narrow minded. Its like religion. You force children to believe in weird crap their entire childhoods and deny their rational ideas, and boom, you have possible future Bible-thumpers. Its the same problem in academia. They get so engrossed with ideas they are FOR SURE ARE CORRECT that when any possible alternative pops up, it is immediately ignored and the messenger ridiculed into oblivion. Good thing I was in the marines. I don't think any academic type could handle this ridicule and dealing with the snobs.

As well, I think I've been spot on the entire time. Focused as hell. Stellar evolution is planet formation. We're standing on a star that is billions of years older than the Sun. It is the rocky/metal differentiated remains of a single star's evolution. The Juno spacecraft is going to find that Jupiter has a small core, it is still being formed as we speak. It is an Earth oven. Its baking an Earth in there, all middle aged stars do that once they cool down enough.

Fool-People-Mark-Twain.jpg


Oh btw here are some new papers.

Coherency principle.

http://vixra.org/abs/1607.0027

Thermodynamic phase aging.

http://vixra.org/abs/1607.0008

Oh and I think they are finally waking up so to speak. Check out all those views. I've never seen those two pages like that.

http://stellar-metamorphosis.blogspot.com/2016/07/views-of-nebular-hypothesisformation.html
 
Last edited:
jeffreyw said:
Fooling the academics is easy... just pump them through years of school and make sure none deviate from the dogma.
Click to expand...

The fact that new scientific discoveries are being made all the time by those same people kinda puts a damper on that idea, doesn't it?
 
jeffreyw]: Typical Internet crank paranoia about a "cabal"

jeffreyw said:
The fact that they don't realize they are a "cabal" is the whole point.
Click to expand...
6 July 2016 jeffreyw: Typical Internet crank paranoia about a "cabal" :eek:!
Followed by
6 July 2016 jeffreyw: Typical Internet crank ranting about "dogma", "narrow minded", "weird crap", etc. :eek:!

Anyone with enough brain cells to understand textbooks or Wikipedia will know that it is deluded to think that planets are stars. That is not just academia - that is high school children and older :jaw-dropp!
jeffreyw: 58 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015
  1. 29 December 2014 jeffreyw: The ignorance of exoplanets can be seen by eye when the "exo" part means outside of the Solar System!
  2. 29 December 2014 jeffreyw: A "The closed minded dogmatists (which are probably very, very many) on this forum..." post
  3. 29 December 2014 jeffreyw: The ignorant assertion that stellar system formation is "dark matter, spacetime warping, big bang creationism".
  4. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Unable to support his idea rationally with evidence so he has to resort to gibberish and insults.

BTW
  • Delusions in PDFs on a PDF upload web site do not impress anyone.
  • The view count of a deluded web site does not impress anyone even when more people go to it to see just how deluded it is.
 
Last edited:
reality check needs a reality check. I get it!

Anyways, the brain teasers are one thing. Lets not tease people and offer them an actual explanation of what the Earth is. Actually, you can ignore all the words! Its great! You can watch a star cool and die becoming the "planet". Ay dios mio!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGES3MnMhfQ

Oh and the theory is growing significantly. I'm still the KING CRANK!!! WHERE'S MY IG NOBEL !!!?? Lord knows I'll never get a real Nobel, those only go to Ivory Tower representatives.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Stellar_metamorphosis
 
Last edited:
I believe Ignobels only go to credentialed researchers that should know better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom