Originally Posted by Fast Eddie B
1/ I'm sure it's intended to adopt the vernacular of the barely literate Trumpians who see "gummint" as the enemy.
2/ "Defective" might be a stretch, but the law would presume -- subject to appeal -- that a person who has been determined to be incompetent to handle his own financial affairs is also incompetent to buy a firearm. Maybe too broad, but not much different from imposing a similar restriction on someone who has been committed to a mental hospital. And the restriction would only be on new purchases, not continued possession of guns someone already owns.