Merged A God of Love / The Living God

Johanabrahams said:
kali1137 said:
I call it that because that is exactly what it is.
Click to expand...

Yep. But you should have facts.

kali1137 said:
The only link you provided that works is a random(to anyone who doesn't personally know him)guy and his buddy having a beer.
Click to expand...

Yep. That was the case. But my son changed his settings.

https://web.facebook.com/photo.php?....247361635366343.36890.100002775263058&type=3

kali1137 said:
There are no comments to be seen that back up your claim, nor is there anything else on that page that is out of the ordinary.
Click to expand...

It was only because of your sloppiness.

kali1137 said:
You should take your own parting advice.
Click to expand...

Nope. You should get thorough.
Click to expand...

BWAHAHAHAHA. So, you admit that your "son" borked the thing you harassed him into doing, and then after weeks of being told that it was borked, you finally harassed him into correcting the blunder. Then you accuse US of being sloppy?

**** off and own your own blunders.
 
Johanabrahams said:
Because of your sloppiness.



Again your sloppiness.



Now I teach you the right way.
Click to expand...

It was not their sloppiness but YOURS. You admitted as much when you had the security settings on the image changed.

Are you really that incapable of admitting your error?
 
abaddon said:
BWAHAHAHAHA. So, you admit that your "son" borked the thing you harassed him into doing, and then after weeks of being told that it was borked, you finally harassed him into correcting the blunder. Then you accuse US of being sloppy?

**** off and own your own blunders.
Click to expand...

Eventually he MIGHT figure out who is causing all his problems.

tIWHfSQl.jpg
 
Johanabrahams said:
Yep. That was the case. But my son changed his settings.
Click to expand...

kali1137 said:
There are no comments to be seen that back up your claim, nor is there anything else on that page that is out of the ordinary.
Click to expand...
Johanabrahams said:
It was only because of your sloppiness.
Click to expand...

Now you're just being an asshòle. You literally just posted that Zola has only now changed his settings, and you call Kali sloppy because she didn't have access to the information that's newly become available?

As if we didn't already know what you were about, you reveal yourself to have the pig-spirit you're so fond of accusing everyone else of having.
 
Johanabrahams said:
abaddon said:
It is a picture of some bloke drinking a beer in some shack somewhere. How is it not random and pointless?
Click to expand...

Because of your sloppiness.

abaddon said:
Oh, no, no, no. We have all tested and verified that kali is indeed Cleopatra to the exclusion of anything else.
Click to expand...

Again your sloppiness.

abaddon said:
Now what?
Click to expand...

Now I teach you the right way.
Click to expand...
It is your sloppiness which caused all of this. To late to blame anyone else now.

Kali claimed to be Cleopatra and I backed her up. By your standards, you must accept that as true.

You have nothing to offer, nothing to teach.
 
abaddon said:
It is your sloppiness which caused all of this. To late to blame anyone else now.

Kali claimed to be Cleopatra and I backed her up. By your standards, you must accept that as true.

You have nothing to offer, nothing to teach.
Click to expand...

I don't know about that. I think the life of Johanabrahams is an excellent cautionary tale about pride and delusion.
 
abaddon said:
My actual identity is publically available on this very site. You have been told this before. Knock off the lies.
Click to expand...

Where. The scarecrow photo or your profile info in "about me" that says "General failure". Well actually that is what it turns out to be. A general failure.


abaddon said:
I am not your son nor ever will be.
Click to expand...


So do not get upset. I am not forcing you to change. I am only speaking from my side. Which means that my heart is correct and yours might be restored in future. But do not jump the gun.

abaddon said:
No, there still is no such thing as "ghosts" no matter how much you stamp your widdle feets.
Click to expand...

Well now. You found many in Robertson. And you associated yourself with them. Becoming one too.
 
Johanabrahams said:
abaddon said:
My actual identity is publically available on this very site. You have been told this before. Knock off the lies.
Click to expand...

Where. The scarecrow photo or your profile info in "about me" that says "General failure". Well actually that is what it turns out to be. A general failure.
Click to expand...
In a thread on this site, in response to a moronic claim, I dropped my engineering credentials for all to see along with the means to verify them. You could, no doubt, find those quite easily. You are god, are you not? They are here on this site, you know. Seek and you shall find.

Johanabrahams said:
abaddon said:
I am not your son nor ever will be.
Click to expand...


So do not get upset. I am not forcing you to change. I am only speaking from my side. Which means that my heart is correct and yours might be restored in future. But do not jump the gun.
Click to expand...
Your "gun" never had any ammo in it and you broke the firing pin.

Johanabrahams said:
abaddon said:
No, there still is no such thing as "ghosts" no matter how much you stamp your widdle feets.
Click to expand...

Well now. You found many in Robertson. And you associated yourself with them. Becoming one too.
Click to expand...
No, what I found in Robertson were real people, sick to death of your behaviour and still in the process of healing. Be under no illusion, you did a lot of harm to a lot of real people with your nonsense and I have little tolerance for that.
 
Johanabrahams said:
Where. The scarecrow photo or your profile info in "about me" that says "General failure". Well actually that is what it turns out to be. A general failure.
Click to expand...

Anyone else notice the absurdity of someone claiming to be a god and then demanding others tell them who they are?

Johanabrahams said:
So do not get upset. I am not forcing you to change. I am only speaking from my side. Which means that my heart is correct and yours might be restored in future. But do not jump the gun.
Click to expand...

Riiiight. We're supposed to accept the divinity of a guy whose "evidence" consists of some random dude calling him "mother" back in September.

I propose a new unit of measurement, the Johanabrahams.

A single Johanabrahams is the amount of evidence our Johanabrahams has offered to support his claims of divinity. This is a VERY low bar to set. A single person calling you "mother" despite you not having literally birthed them constitutes a Johanabrahams. This means any adoptive, foster or step-mother already has at least one Johanabrahams. Every trans-woman whose sperm produced a child who is then called "mom" by that child has a claim to divinity equal to that of Johanabrahams. (More if you count transitioning as a form of transfiguration.)

Now that we have the Johanabrahams, I want to abuse it. I propose we start calling each other "mother" in this thread and we keep a tally of how many Johanabrahams each of us accumulates. The ONLY person we DON'T give more Johanabrahams is Johanabrahams himself. Noe of us should call Johanabrahams "mother" or any derivative thereof.

So, Mother abaddon, will you join me in this?

(Note, abaddon now has one Johanabrahams, meaning his claim to divinity is equal to that of the Johanabrahams posting in this thread.)

It also occurs to me we need an abbreviation or symbol for the Johanabrahams. Any suggestions?
 
fagin said:
My suggestion might get me banned.
Click to expand...

Unless you already have a few strikes against you it will probably only get you suspended, not banned outright.

/me calls fagin "Mother."
/me calls TofuFighter "Mother."

Everyone is responsible for keeping track of their OWN Johanabrahams. Try to be accurate. This is for science.
 
Last edited:
halleyscomet said:
Anyone else notice the absurdity of someone claiming to be a god and then demanding others tell them who they are?



Riiiight. We're supposed to accept the divinity of a guy whose "evidence" consists of some random dude calling him "mother" back in September.

I propose a new unit of measurement, the Johanabrahams.

A single Johanabrahams is the amount of evidence our Johanabrahams has offered to support his claims of divinity. This is a VERY low bar to set. A single person calling you "mother" despite you not having literally birthed them constitutes a Johanabrahams. This means any adoptive, foster or step-mother already has at least one Johanabrahams. Every trans-woman whose sperm produced a child who is then called "mom" by that child has a claim to divinity equal to that of Johanabrahams. (More if you count transitioning as a form of transfiguration.)

Now that we have the Johanabrahams, I want to abuse it. I propose we start calling each other "mother" in this thread and we keep a tally of how many Johanabrahams each of us accumulates. The ONLY person we DON'T give more Johanabrahams is Johanabrahams himself. Noe of us should call Johanabrahams "mother" or any derivative thereof.

So, Mother abaddon, will you join me in this?

(Note, abaddon now has one Johanabrahams, meaning his claim to divinity is equal to that of the Johanabrahams posting in this thread.)

It also occurs to me we need an abbreviation or symbol for the Johanabrahams. Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Certainly, Mother halleyscomet, I award you one Johanabrahams.

ETA: As for the units name, I suggest it be measured in "borks".
 
Last edited:
Tally so far...

halleyscomet=2 borks
abaddon=1 bork
TofuFighter= 1 bork
Fagin=1 bork
Johanabrahams=1 bork

Thus halleyscomet is the most divine of all of us.
 
halleyscomet said:
So you're calling people who disagree with you "ghosts." Is that an implied threat of fatal violence against them?
Click to expand...

Nope. It is your lack of reading more in this thread that brings you to this conclusion. But look it up. Let us see if you can see the reason why he is the ghost and not you.

halleyscomet said:
Yeah, I'm sure he's REALLY broken up about failing the chance to join you in your creepy, non-consensual, age/incest/lactation kink fantasy.
Click to expand...

Nope. You should really concentrate when you are reading. See if you can pick up his spirit. If you can not then ask him how he feels.




halleyscomet said:
Your "context" so far has been you claiming to be a god while trying to entice others to join you in a weird kink role playing fantasy where you're gender-swapped and lactating. I think I can safely bring up Japanese hungry ghosts in response to a comment about ghosts without incurring the wrath of the moderators.
Click to expand...

Well just look how much wisdom you got now in one post. Imagine how much it will be when you stick with me. No force. Your decision. Even the others will also like that. You can also give us a lot of nice pictures to look at while you are acquiring wisdom.
 
Last edited:
Updated tally...

halleyscomet=2 borks
Fagin=2 borks
abaddon=1 bork
TofuFighter= 1 bork
Johanabrahams=1 bork

Thus halleyscomet/fagin are the most divine of all of us.
 
abaddon said:
Will you please stop this. It is a picture of two blokes drinking beer in a shack. It has no caption, nor any comments. Nor are you in it. We can all verify this and have done so multiple times. Searching that page for the word "mother" yields zero results, and the second picture is of some random kid. Out of curiosity, I browsed his photos and you are not there anywhere either.
Click to expand...

Ok. I can see that you really tried your best. Not with much wisdom though. Because you didn't find that was there all the time.

But here it is again. My son changed his settings to include the public. Somebody put me on the track with good advice. And it seems that it worked. Unlike you of course just complaining. But a good mother do not through away the kids that are on the wrong tracks. She helps them to find the correct ones.
 
Johanabrahams said:
halleyscomet said:
So you're calling people who disagree with you "ghosts." Is that an implied threat of fatal violence against them?
Click to expand...

Nope. It is your lack of reading more in this thread that brings you to this conclusion. But look it up. Let us see if you can see the reason why he is the ghost and not you.
Click to expand...
Nope. No such thing as ghosts and yes, we are reading this thread and you incoherent rants elsewhere, and yes, we have fact checked your claims. Tough luck, if you don't much like that.

Johanabrahams said:
halleyscomet said:
Yeah, I'm sure he's REALLY broken up about failing the chance to join you in your creepy, non-consensual, age/incest/lactation kink fantasy.
Click to expand...

Nope. You should really concentrate when you are reading. See if you can pick up his spirit. If you can not then ask him how he feels.
Click to expand...
Is warm and cuddly a valid answer?

Johanabrahams said:
halleyscomet said:
Your "context" so far has been you claiming to be a god while trying to entice others to join you in a weird kink role playing fantasy where you're gender-swapped and lactating. I think I can safely bring up Japanese hungry ghosts in response to a comment about ghosts without incurring the wrath of the moderators.
Click to expand...

Well just look how much wisdom you got now in one post. Imagine how much it will be when you stick with me. No force. Your decision. Even the others will also like that. You can also give us a lot of nice pictures to look at while you are acquiring wisdom.
Click to expand...
The decision has largely been made already.
 
abaddon said:
Updated tally...

halleyscomet=2 borks
Fagin=2 borks
abaddon=1 bork
TofuFighter= 1 bork
Johanabrahams=1 bork

Thus halleyscomet/fagin are the most divine of all of us.
Click to expand...

You tried your best, mom. So did I, but I concede defeat to halleyscomet and Fagin.
 
halleyscomet said:
Still no dice, largely because you fail at understanding remedial web security.
Click to expand...

Yep. Agree.

halleyscomet said:
We are blocked from seeing the image. A direct link won't work. Hunting for it in their profile won't work. You are allowed to see the image because that's how the person whose profile you are linking to has set up the security.
Click to expand...

Yep. Discovered that.

halleyscomet said:
Zola want's YOU to be able to see the image, but does NOT want outsiders like us to see it. The security he's placed on the image proves he's only humoring you. Whatever he wrote on the image is meant for you to see, but he has no interest in letting outsiders see it.

If whatever he wrote there were sincere, he wouldn't be restricting it this way.
Click to expand...

Now this is where you go wrong. Judging his reasons. Well I linked this post to him. Let us see what he say.


halleyscomet said:
Clearly he doesn't fear you as a supernatural entity, or he wouldn't try such a transparent tactic.
Click to expand...

As I said. You judge prematurely. Without having the facts you say that his intentions were bad. And you make him a bad person. Playing with me and you.

halleyscomet said:
The one follower you thought you have has in fact rejected you, and you gave us the proof yourself.
Click to expand...

And I opened your eyes about the fake that my son is. According to you.

Well I still believe in him believing that you are making the mistake. But obviously the future will show us who is the correct judge. So hang in there.
 
Johanabrahams said:
Well just look how much wisdom you got now in one post. Imagine how much it will be when you stick with me. No force. Your decision. Even the others will also like that. You can also give us a lot of nice pictures to look at while you are acquiring wisdom.
Click to expand...



That’s right ladies and gentlemen. Johanabrahams has just admitted that he’s engaging in a role-play fetish session with his posts here, and referred to my pointing it out as “wisdom.” Our consent to being part of his sexual role play? Irrelevant to Johanabrahams.

Are there any forum rules that cover engaging in sexual role play on the forum without the consent of the other people in the thread?

Between that and his earlier implication that he sees children and relatives as viable sexual partners I think we may have a contender for “forum member most likely to be jailed.”
 
Last edited:
halleyscomet said:
None of that addresses my point about Jesus wantonly destroying the property of innocent bystanders. There is nothing in the text to suggest the people whose property was destroyed were undergoing any kind of a divine test as Job was.
Click to expand...

Yep. It is not necessary to know about the property since we have Job. So stick to what the context wants us to see. The spirits fit for the pigs. And the pigs handling them well.
 
Johanabrahams said:
And I opened your eyes about the fake that my son is. According to you.



Well I still believe in him believing that you are making the mistake. But obviously the future will show us who is the correct judge. So hang in there.
Click to expand...



All you did was prove one person called you “Mother.” As you can see in this thread there are already multiple people in this discussion who have surpassed you in that regard. Going by the hard numbers and your standard of evidence I’m literally twice the god you are. By your own standards you must now kneel and call ME Mother.

Although, given your recent admissions of this being a kink play session for you, I’d really prefer you NOT call me Mother.
 
Johanabrahams said:
Ok. I can see that you really tried your best. Not with much wisdom though. Because you didn't find that was there all the time.

But here it is again. My son changed his settings to include the public. Somebody put me on the track with good advice. And it seems that it worked. Unlike you of course just complaining. But a good mother do not through away the kids that are on the wrong tracks. She helps them to find the correct ones.
Click to expand...
Outright lies now, is it? That is the game now is it?

From 26th Sept. to 11th Oct. everyone here was telling you that what you claimed was at that site was not at that site. This was a matter of fact.

Now, you are attempting to shift blame for your blundering to wherever you think you can. Well, sorry. That will no more fly than the notion that a rock will spontaneously levitate.

Do you not realise that people here told you your link was useless because it didn't actually link to what you claimed? Do you not realise that all of us were being honest? Do you not realise that you admitted that we were correct? Do you not realise that you are now being intentionally dishonest about it?

Had you had the honesty to step up and admit that you made a mistake, that would be fine and likely soon forgotten. But no, you had to double down. When caught on that falsehood, you tripled down and finally, when you had nowhere to go, you simply lied your head off. This is not opinion. All of the posts are still there, we can all read them, and you demonstrably lied purposefully.

Now, in keeping with the law of unintended consequences, everything you post will be subjected to severe scrutiny, since we have established already that you play fast and loose with reality thanks to your very own posts.
 
TofuFighter said:
You tried your best, mom. So did I, but I concede defeat to halleyscomet and Fagin.
Click to expand...

Fear not, that gives me an extra bork.

Updated tally...

halleyscomet=2 borks
Fagin=2 borks
abaddon=2 bork
TofuFighter= 1 bork
Johanabrahams=1 bork


Thanks, mom.

Oops,

Updated tally...

halleyscomet=2 borks
Fagin=2 borks
abaddon=2 borks
TofuFighter= 2 borks
Johanabrahams=1 bork
 
abaddon said:
And there is where you stray. You are adding to the bible to suit yourself.

But the bible has some words directed specifically at such actions:

Deu 4:2, or Rev 22:18.
Click to expand...

Nope. According to Job I did not. But saying now that God was stealing would be adding. That you did.

abaddon said:
And who exactly killed those seven sons and three daughters on a trivial bet?
Click to expand...

The Bible tells us.

Well seeing that you know the Bible. Tell us who you think.

abaddon said:
That is not how it works. You did all of those things. Just you. You are simply attempting to evade your own personal responsibility.
Click to expand...

You are entitled to your opinion. The Mother takes it from there.
 
Johanabrahams said:
abaddon said:
And there is where you stray. You are adding to the bible to suit yourself.

But the bible has some words directed specifically at such actions:

Deu 4:2, or Rev 22:18.
Click to expand...

Nope. According to Job I did not. But saying now that God was stealing would be adding. That you did.
Click to expand...
I didn't add a thing. I simply cited the vile book and what it actually says.

Johanabrahams said:
abaddon said:
And who exactly killed those seven sons and three daughters on a trivial bet?
Click to expand...

The Bible tells us.

Well seeing that you know the Bible. Tell us who you think.
Click to expand...
Your god bears the responsibility for that nonsense.

Johanabrahams said:
abaddon said:
That is not how it works. You did all of those things. Just you. You are simply attempting to evade your own personal responsibility.
Click to expand...

You are entitled to your opinion. The Mother takes it from there.
Click to expand...
Which mother? In a race of five people claiming to be "mother", you are currently running in last place. Were it not for you harassing Zola, you would not even be on the list. And you incompetently failed at that anyway.
 
Argumemnon said:
Why the redundancy? If your brain is quite able to feel the pain in the hand, why would it need a spirit to do the same job? And where does that spirit come from? Who sends it to tell you "ow"?
Click to expand...

I was not speaking about that. I was speaking about the anger wanting to take revenge.

Argumemnon said:
At this point I think I understand them better than you do.
Click to expand...

Nope. You didn't see the anger.

Argumemnon said:
Look up the word.
Click to expand...

No need to because it was not a fact in the first place. Only you thinking so although you already said it is just "suspiciously" so.

Argumemnon said:
They sound suspiciously like deluded human thoughts.
Click to expand...
================

Argumemnon said:
Don't lie, now. I was talking about your secrets, not speaking against abaddon.
Click to expand...

The only one here with secrets at this stage is Abaddon and his Robertson secrets. No need to be scared of him. We should not fear human beings but the wrongs we are doing. Because others see it.
 
Johanabrahams said:
halleyscomet said:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/636945249a68ea64ee.gif[/qimg]

Citation needed. The Bible says nothing about the fig tree being replaced or the murdered swine being replaced.
Click to expand...

yep. Job got a lot more and so did I.
Click to expand...

Did you even read what I wrote before posting that irrelevant drivel?

We're not talking about you or Job. We're talking about the pigs Jesus murdered and the fig tree he destroyed.

You'd think a god would be able to focus on the topic at hand. Have you been evaluated for early onset dementia?

Johanabrahams said:
The ghost met with other ghosts in Robertson. You should read up on it. All here in this thread.
Click to expand...

Or you could be a good boy and fetch us a link.
 
abaddon said:
In other words, you made it up, because that is not in your magic book.
Click to expand...

Nope. There is Job.

abaddon said:
It is not a matter of opinion, neither yours nor mine. It is written in your magic book.
Click to expand...

God is a "dick" written in the book and not an opinion? Show me.


abaddon said:
That is not what your magic book actually says. It is simply something you made up. Try actually reading the horrible thing.
Click to expand...

Yep. Sure. Reading it will be horrible. But you should drink it.

1Pe 2:2* As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:*

abaddon said:
Wow. You are totally amoral.
Click to expand...

I know. I am godly.

abaddon said:
You have provided nothing to "pick up".
Click to expand...

Nope you missed it. But I will give it again. Just stay with me.

abaddon said:
No, it won't become clear. You have never even made the attempt to be clear.
Click to expand...

Well I am spending a lot of time with you all.
 
Johanabrahams said:
Yep. But you should have facts.



Yep. That was the case. But my son changed his settings.
https://web.facebook.com/photo.php?....247361635366343.36890.100002775263058&type=3



It was only because of your sloppiness.



Nope. You should get thorough.
Click to expand...

You admit the mistake is on your end and then call me sloppy? As Halleyscomet has so kindly pointed out, the mistake and nonsense is all on your end.
Anyone else noticing that the more he is called out on said nonsense, the more aggressive he becomes with insults and name-calling? Such none godlike behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom