• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Behavior of UK Police officers.

Meanwhile - I happened across an EDL march in Manchester (they were being escorted to Manchester Piccadilly and it looked pretty similar to this one in Bristol:

https://www.indy100.com/article/an-...truly-upstaged-by-naked-cyclists--bJmWR8wY6QZ

only with attendees to a comics convention rather than naked cyclists.

One of the EDL members had a Union flag. I was tempted to tell him to show some respect for the flag as he was dragging it along the ground. Unfortunately he was too far away.
 
MikeG said:
Your ridiculous lies about no-go areas
Click to expand...

CBP9wlp.png
 
Baylor said:
No. It's not a "my feelings are hurt" argument. You people keep saying I don't know anything about the UK. Well, switching countries, we feel the exact way about you--if not more strongly.


Wrong again. I have a lot of people replying to me. Most, if not all are insincere. I have no intention of playing the "if I get the last word I win" game.

Someone in the current year has opinions that deviates from what I deem acceptable.
Click to expand...


Except that there are statistics and reputable US news organisations as well as some US polices own investigations supporting what we are saying, whilst you have context-free gifs and mis-titled youtube videos promoted by conspiracy theorists. Some of whom seem to think that 9/11 was done by teh Jooz.
 
jimbob said:
Except that there are statistics and reputable US news organisations as well as some US polices own investigations supporting what we are saying, whilst you have context-free gifs and mis-titled youtube videos promoted by conspiracy theorists. Some of whom seem to think that 9/11 was done by teh Jooz.
Click to expand...

Gish gallop nonsense.
 
jimbob said:
Except that there are statistics and reputable US news organisations as well as some US polices own investigations supporting what we are saying,
Click to expand...

You are off topic but blacks make up 44% of cop killers but only 30% of people killed by cops are black.
 
Baylor said:
You are off topic but blacks make up 44% of cop killers but only 30% of people killed by cops are black.
Click to expand...

We have so few people in either category that we don't have comparable statistics. And of course, every time a policeman kills someone there is a full and independent investigation, and misdeeds can end up with a murder charge. Pity the US can't be bothered with such niceties.
 
Last edited:
Baylor said:
You are off topic but blacks make up 44% of cop killers but only 30% of people killed by cops are black.
Click to expand...

I'd argue that most shootings by US police probably are justified. However there are statistics that suggest that many are not.

Most people shot by US police are armed. That might be an issue, but it's a wider one than simple US police behaviour. Armed Whites and Blacks seem to be shot in roughly the proportions you'd expect from demographics.

However, when you get to shooting of unarmed people, the statistics diverge.

Blacks far outweigh the proportion you'd expect for this.

It't the shooting of people who are no threat that is the problem.
 
jimbob said:
I'd argue that most shootings by US police probably are justified. However there are statistics that suggest that many are not.

Most people shot by US police are armed. That might be an issue, but it's a wider one than simple US police behaviour. Armed Whites and Blacks seem to be shot in roughly the proportions you'd expect from demographics.

However, when you get to shooting of unarmed people, the statistics diverge.

Blacks far outweigh the proportion you'd expect for this.

It't the shooting of people who are no threat that is the problem.
Click to expand...

Your problem is assuming blacks and whites act the same. They don't--especially in situations to which you are referring. Sorry but you're not going to be able to understand the world reading BBC articles.
 
Baylor said:
No go zones are pertinent to this thread. The area circled in red of the satellite image another example of a no-go zone.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/OcigG5K.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

What, you'd expect to be able to wander through Buckingham Palace at will, would you? In the same way that ordinary members of the public can wander around the White House whenever they want.
 
Baylor said:
No go zones are pertinent to this thread.....
Click to expand...

Indeed they are. But most London members of this forum have the good sense not to be involved with a gormless thread started by a lying white supremacist, and the best way to get them to comment on the claims of no-go areas in London is to have a thread specifically to those ends.
 
MikeG said:
What, you'd expect to be able to wander through Buckingham Palace at will, would you? In the same way that ordinary members of the public can wander around the White House whenever they want.
Click to expand...


Most of DC is a no-go area. And just look at the size of this mosque!

And it’s all full of immigrants from thousands of miles to the East, many of them religious fanatics.
 
Last edited:
Vixen said:
<fx wears a tin hat> Can I stick my head above the parapet?

The phenomenon of the Asian gangs grooming young girls in Rotherham and elsewhere was a product of the pattern of immigration of some subcontinent groups. Their being 'Muslim' is purely concomitant with the original reason of the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants in the early 1960's. Their sole aim was to work in England for a few years, sending money back home, and then to return to marry and raise a family. Thus, this group of migrant was predominantly male, and their pattern of housing was house-sharing, so there'd be a whole household of male occupants (we saw this with some immigrants from East Europe).

Then, the government brought in a Nationality Act which allowed them to bring in their wives and families by a certain date (I think, 1963) after which time no more free migration from Pakistan/India would be allowed. Therefore, instead of returning home, they reasoned they'd bring their close relatives over. The females arrived much later. By then, there was an established culture of a handful of Asian guys buying a house and then sharing it with their fellow countrymen.

Being young males, they were sexually predatory and thus targetted indigenous females, as their own were thousands of miles away.

Unfortunately, this became an ingrained culture which became exposed in recent years as being highly criminal, abherent and organised crime against young girls.

This was not helped by social workers ignoring the girls' plight and dismissing it as their 'lifestyle choice'.

However, the crime is zero to do with 'being Muslim'.

Learn to understand cause and effect, instead of inciting hatred against Muslims.
Click to expand...

This seems a very persuasive explanation as to how this particular sub-culture developed.
 
Last edited:
Baylor said:
I get people here think EDL=bad.
Click to expand...
No, they're cockwombles.

But they have every right to not want another mosque in their city.
Click to expand...
Except it's invariably not "their" city at all, because the vast majority of EDL member or fellow travellers at any one demo will not be even remotely local. The same EDL cockwombles travel round the country to preach their hate wherever their wankmonger leadership tells them to go, like some sort of cockwomble/wankmonger demo merry-go-round. The only way the EDL manages to get so many people in any one place is by bringing them in from the rest of the country, and even then they are invariably outnumbered by counter-demonstrations, which usually have a far greater percentage of actual local participants, if not the majority.

It's perfectly normal to want to resist a foreign people with a different language, religion, values moving into your country by the millions. You're the weird one for not caring.
Click to expand...
Who are these "millions" of which you speak, and when did they arrive?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Baylor said:
Gish gallop nonsense.
Click to expand...

You were the person originally linking to videos by "Wakeupslave.com" (which no longer exists on youtube)

I looked at some of their other postings and came up with this.

attachment.php


Rabid conspiracy theorists misunderstanding and misrepresenting whatever they touch.
 
 
Baylor said:
It's certainly a no-go zone for black people: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/queens-guard-knocks-out-annoying-6013025
Click to expand...

Except not actually real. Even mentioned in the article, but we know comprehension is not your strong suite.

"However, despite the clip going viral on Facebook, with more than 70,000 views, the internet is not convinced by the clip's authenticity.

For a start, the guard appears to be wearing a replica uniform, which does not feature a white belt or a strap from the bearskin hat across the chin.

The soldier is also stood without his bayonet-tipped rifle."

Even the bloody Mail managed to work it out.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...side-Buckingham-Palace-social-experiment.html
 
jimbob said:
You were the person originally linking to videos by "Wakeupslave.com" (which no longer exists on youtube)

I looked at some of their other postings and came up with this.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=39001&d=1538340807[/qimg]

Rabid conspiracy theorists misunderstanding and misrepresenting whatever they touch.
Click to expand...

You keep saying this as if it means anything. The video footage clearly depicts UK police cowering to Muslims, video footage that would be permissible in a court of law. Because it was hosted on a conspiracy channel doesn't negate this fact. Truther channels also have unedited footage of the 9/11 attacks, guess that means 9/11 was fake, according to you.
 
Baylor said:
[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/CBP9wlp.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I visited the no-go are of Preston in the week to do a couple of jobs.

I got out alive and un-raped.

Where did you get that laughable picture?

Islington a no go area? Camden a no-go area?

You reveal your complete lack of knowledge of London.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom