Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uranus is avy for ten years to reach positions.

Neptune in the same area of influence only after about 40 years.

Saturn now on the opposite side, so 15 years goes before Saturn is in the same area of influence.

https://space.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/...0&minute=00&fovmul=1&rfov=45&bfov=30&showac=1

Neptune working for phenomena 30 - 50 years

Uranus 20 - 30 years

Saturnus 5 - 10 years

So together 70 - 90 years is possibility

Uranus on avout kymmenen vuoden päästä asemissa.

Neptunus samalla vaikutusalueella vasta about 40 vuoden päästä.

Saturnus nyt täysin vastakkaisella puolella, joten 15 vuotta menee ennen kuin Saturnus on samalla vaikutusalueella.


https://space.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/...0&minute=00&fovmul=1&rfov=45&bfov=30&showac=1

😃
 
Merkurius + Venus + Maa + Mars = about 340 days

88 + 224 + 365 + 686 = 1363

1363 / 4 = 340,75 days

Joten ennustan että pidempi havannointi muuttaa keskiarvon tuoksi 340 päiväksi ja silleen!

😃
 
Pixie of key said:
Merkurius + Venus + Maa + Mars = about 340 days

88 + 224 + 365 + 686 = 1363

1363 / 4 = 340,75 days

Joten ennustan että pidempi havannointi muuttaa keskiarvon tuoksi 340 päiväksi ja silleen!

😃
Click to expand...


Wait, sum the sidereal periods then divide by 4? Numerology at its worst (which for numerology is numerology at its best). See, "keskiarvon" the average (in this case the mean), communication is actually easier when you use the correct words. However, you have provided no indication as to why that average should be relevant other than it simply being numerologically close to the "shorter cycle" you mentioned.
 
Pixie of key said:
Uranus is avy for ten years to reach positions.

Neptune in the same area of influence only after about 40 years.

Saturn now on the opposite side, so 15 years goes before Saturn is in the same area of influence.

https://space.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/...0&minute=00&fovmul=1&rfov=45&bfov=30&showac=1

Neptune working for phenomena 30 - 50 years

Uranus 20 - 30 years

Saturnus 5 - 10 years

So together 70 - 90 years is possibility

Uranus on avout kymmenen vuoden päästä asemissa.

Neptunus samalla vaikutusalueella vasta about 40 vuoden päästä.

Saturnus nyt täysin vastakkaisella puolella, joten 15 vuotta menee ennen kuin Saturnus on samalla vaikutusalueella.


https://space.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/...0&minute=00&fovmul=1&rfov=45&bfov=30&showac=1

😃
Click to expand...

Now you are more concerned with actual position then just the average of the periods?
 
You still do not understand how to push it?

The sun is expanding with the expanding bubbles of Jupiter's magnetic material obtained over hundreds of years, and the effect of other gas planets is not as deeply influenced by Jupiter's influence inside the Sun.

So, other gas planets just accelerate the momentum of bubbles coming to the surface of the Sun, though they will reach the protruding above.

And this takes place at a certain depths of Jupiter's expanding array of bubbles, the volume of which grows when combined with the expanding material bubbles generated by other gas planets, which also accelerate their upward movement to reach the protruding expanses of Jupiter.

Try it even.

Or is this too much for your brain?

😃


Ette vieläkään ymmärrä miten tää työntyy?

Auringosta on työntymässä Jupiterin aikaan saamia magneettisesta aineesta koostuvia laajenevia kuplia satojen vuosien ajalta ja muiden kaasuplaneettojen vaikutus ei ylety yhtä syvälle Auringon sisälle mitä Jupiterin vaikutus.

Joten muut kaasuplaneetat vain kiihdyttävät jo Auringon pintaa kohti työntyvien kuplien vauhtia, jollloin ne saavuttavat edellä työntyviä.

Ja tämä tapahtuu tietyssä syvyydessä oleville Jupiterin aikaan saamille laajeneville ainekuplille joiden tilavuus samalla kasvaa kun niihin yhdistyy muiden kaasuplaneettojen aikaansaamat laajenevat ainekuplat, jotka siis myös kiihdyttävät niiden vauhtia ylös päin, jolloin ne saavuttavat edellä työntyviä Jupiterin aikaan saamia laajenevia ainekuplia.

Yrittäkää edes.

Vai onko tämäkin liikaa teidän aivoillenne?!!

😃
 
Pixie of key said:
You still do not understand how to push it?
Click to expand...

No one need push your melarkey.


Pixie of key said:
The sun is expanding with the expanding bubbles of Jupiter's magnetic material obtained over hundreds of years, and the effect of other gas planets is not as deeply influenced by Jupiter's influence inside the Sun.
Click to expand...

There is no observational evidence "The sun is expanding" as you assert "with the expanding bubbles of Jupiter's magnetic material". What exactly is "magnetic material" anyway?

Pixie of key said:
So, other gas planets just accelerate the momentum of bubbles coming to the surface of the Sun, though they will reach the protruding above.
Click to expand...

Coronal loops aren't bubbles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_loop

They are plasma filled flux tubes originating from the solar dynamo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_dynamo

Now the effects of the orbiting planets can undoubtedly influence that dynamo and hence the solar cycles, without any of your malarky.

https://phys.org/news/2016-10-link-solar-tidal-effects-venus.html

Actual research is much more interesting, informative, self-consistent and generally consistent than your simple speculations.



Pixie of key said:
And this takes place at a certain depths of Jupiter's expanding array of bubbles, the volume of which grows when combined with the expanding material bubbles generated by other gas planets, which also accelerate their upward movement to reach the protruding expanses of Jupiter.
Click to expand...

There is no observational evidence of "Jupiter's expanding array of bubbles" "combined with the expanding material bubbles generated by other gas planets". You are just pulling crap out of your arse. Before you were relating the solar sun spot cycles to the orbit of the planets in relation to the galactic center. Now it's some fantasy "expanding array of bubbles" from the gas giants. A minimal effort to try to keep your malarky consistent may help you understand how self-inconsistent it is.


Pixie of key said:
Try it even.
Click to expand...

Try learning instead.

Pixie of key said:
Or is this too much for your brain?

��
Click to expand...

Again not in the least, your fantasy musings are trivially fasle and evidently just based on your visual perception of coronal loops as bubbles. As opposed to plasma filled closed flux tubes. Simply making up stuff is no substitute for actual learning even if the latter is "too much for your brain".


Pixie of key said:
Ette vieläkään ymmärrä miten tää työntyy?

Auringosta on työntymässä Jupiterin aikaan saamia magneettisesta aineesta koostuvia laajenevia kuplia satojen vuosien ajalta ja muiden kaasuplaneettojen vaikutus ei ylety yhtä syvälle Auringon sisälle mitä Jupiterin vaikutus.

Joten muut kaasuplaneetat vain kiihdyttävät jo Auringon pintaa kohti työntyvien kuplien vauhtia, jollloin ne saavuttavat edellä työntyviä.

Ja tämä tapahtuu tietyssä syvyydessä oleville Jupiterin aikaan saamille laajeneville ainekuplille joiden tilavuus samalla kasvaa kun niihin yhdistyy muiden kaasuplaneettojen aikaansaamat laajenevat ainekuplat, jotka siis myös kiihdyttävät niiden vauhtia ylös päin, jolloin ne saavuttavat edellä työntyviä Jupiterin aikaan saamia laajenevia ainekuplia.

Yrittäkää edes.

Vai onko tämäkin liikaa teidän aivoillenne?!!

��
Click to expand...


So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.

Anteeksi en voi edes jäsentää sitä viimeistä bittiä.

Joten, oletko todella kokeillut tätä köysikokeilua vielä?


Jos ei, miksi ei?


Jos on, niin miksi et ilmoittanut, mitä löysit?

Se osoittaisi selkeästi vetovoiman ja työntövoimien välisen eron. Erityisesti materiaaleista, jotka hyvin reagoivat eri tavoin eriarvoisiin voimavaroihin.

Kuinka tämän kokeilun havainnot tukevat sinun "näkökulmastasi", etenkään siitä, että ei ole vetovoimia.
 
Last edited:
More gibberish about the fact that planets have orbits

Pixie of key said:
Merkurius + Venus + Maa + Mars = about 340 days
Click to expand...
More gibberish about the fact that planets have orbits!
Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars have orbits with a sidereal period. Sum them up. Divide by 4. And we get what young children know as an average :eye-poppi!
 
Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on sunspots

Pixie of key said:
Very very interesting video...
Click to expand...
Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on sunspots.
The insanity starts with his usual cartoons. Blobs that look like Uranus, Saturn and Neptune. Sunspot cycle of 11 years.
This is the solar cycle
The solar cycle or solar magnetic activity cycle is the nearly periodic 11-year change in the Sun's activity (including changes in the levels of solar radiation and ejection of solar material) and appearance (changes in the number and size of sunspots, flares, and other manifestations).
...
For example, the cycle length during the early Permian is estimated to be 10.62 years[9] and similarly in the Neoproterozoic.[10][11]
...
Until 2009 it was thought that 28 cycles had spanned the 309 years between 1699 and 2008, giving an average length of 11.04 years, but research then showed that the longest of these (1784–1799) seems actually to have been two cycles,[13][14] so that the average length is only around 10.7 years. Since observations began cycles as short as 9 years and as long as 14 years have been observed, and in the double cycle of 1784-99 one of the two component cycles had to be less than 8 years in length. Significant amplitude variations also occur.
Click to expand...

A deluded lie: A sunspot cycle of 11 years and 315 days when modern cycles are 10.7 years.
He knows about the times that the "cycle" basically stopped making the cycles not periodic like an planet orbit. His ignorant delusions about gas giants does not fix that.
Sunspot numbers over the past 11,400 years give cycle lengths < 11 years.
Thus astronomers and textbooks give 11 years as the average length of sunspot cycles as a result of rounding up.

Abysmal ignorance: Great conjunction. Jupiter and Saturn are on the same side of the Sun every 18-20 years which according to the delusions below would make sunspot numbers peak.

Delusions that make this a typically insane and lying video:
  1. That his sunspot lie has anything to do with the orbit of Jupiter (which is 11 years and 315 days)
  2. That Jupiter gets between the Sun and the Galaxy center each orbit.
    The plane of the Solar system is inclined ~63 degrees to the plane of the Milky Way.
  3. Usual particles expanding insanity
  4. Usual supermassive black hole insanity?
  5. Adds the insanity of an expanding Sun which over the last 4.6 billion years would boil the Earth.
  6. Stupidity that astronomers do not know about and include the sunspot minima such as the Maunder Minimum.
  7. Applies his Jupiter/sunspot delusion to the other gas planets.
  8. Delusion and lie about Jupiter and its Red Spot (only known to have existed for 350 years, is common gas giant weather and is shrinking).
  9. A delusion that his cartoon and random numbers gives the positions of gas giants during sun spot minima when they are well documented :eek:.
  10. Insane "interesting thing":
    A "sun storms cycle" delusion of "330-340" days.
    Stupidity that his delusion is related to the average orbital period of rocky planets.
    Lies about that average which is 341.22 days.
  11. An insane and lying rant about "mathematical people".
    He is the one unable to find the actual 4 orbital periods, add them together and divide by 4 :eye-poppi!
  12. Usual insanity about cosmology.
 
Last edited:
Usual lies and delusions about cosmology and astronomy

Pixie of key said:
There is no expanding space. ...
Click to expand...
Usual lies and delusions about cosmology and astronomy.

A growing list of ignorance, gibberish, lies, insults and delusions:
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space :eye-poppi,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity :eye-poppi),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Insane expanding Earth/Sun/supermassive/etc. gibberish meaning nothing.
A spate of spamming the thread with insane and irrelevant gibberish about science articles.
Insults the intelligence of other posters :eye-poppi!
The physical insanity of "expanding electrons", e.g. violates SR :eek:!
Repeated stupidity that his ignorant gibberish is "too much" for readers of this thread.
An idiotic "gods like expanding space and curving space" lie
"I predict that we can manipulate billions years old expanding light moving direction with other billion years old expanding light" stupidity.
A "the case of dark waves of expanding light has already been proven" lie
An insane demand that an expanding universe be explained with one word.
Persistent lie that no one can tell how the universe is expanding
Repeated lie that I and others have not tried to explain the expansion of the universe.
Insanity of weather being created by "the expanding Earth's center".
"Expanding light waves is dark for us" insanity.
"entropy ... inside quarks and photons too" insanity
 
I Found Out Reason for Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados.

https://youtu.be/mewXaL5Ecag

REVEAL THIS FOR KOSMOLOGIES AND PHYSICS.

Cause For Sunspots.

Cause The sun is short for about 340 days.

Cause for Maunder minimum and other minima.

Reason for Jupiter's red comma.

Cause of hurricanes and tornadoes.

&#55357;&#56835;
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key said:
I Found Out Reason for Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados.

https://youtu.be/mewXaL5Ecag

REVEAL THIS FOR KOSMOLOGIES AND PHYSICS.

Cause For Sunspots.

Cause The sun is short for about 340 days.

Cause for Maunder minimum and other minima.

Reason for Jupiter's red comma.

Cause of hurricanes and tornadoes.

��
Click to expand...




Pixie of key said:
Expanding space is naked empire!


https://youtu.be/A-45AqYtkFw

😃
Click to expand...

If you want to discuss your claims by youtube video then have your discussions on the youtube site. If you want to discuss something here then say it here. This is a discussion forum not a youtube video review forum. No one is obligated to view your videos.
 
Pixie of key said:
I Found Out Reason for Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados.

https://youtu.be/mewXaL5Ecag

REVEAL THIS FOR KOSMOLOGIES AND PHYSICS.

Cause For Sunspots.

Cause The sun is short for about 340 days.

Cause for Maunder minimum and other minima.

Reason for Jupiter's red comma.

Cause of hurricanes and tornadoes.

��
Click to expand...

English is not my mother language.

So, for me is better tell idea with video.

If you dont want to look my video, it is ok.

Dont look, dont comment any way.

Thanks.

😃
 
Pixie of key said:
English is not my mother language.

So, for me is better tell idea with video.

If you dont want to look my video, it is ok.

Dont look, dont comment any way.

Thanks.

��
Click to expand...

How is video supposed to help with a language barrier? Are the videos dubbed into english for you. Text can easily be translated.

I generally don't look at your videos nor comment on those I haven't seen. However, I do comment on your claims made here and others do look at your videos and directly comment on them here. Based on those assessments the pretence that making a video is in any way "better" for communicating your notions is patently false.
 
Last edited:
How real galaxies grow in the real universe.
Shells of Stars in Elliptical Galaxy PGC 42871
Explanation: How do galaxies grow? To help find out, the Hubble Space Telescope was deployed to image the unusual elliptical galaxy PGC 42871. How this galaxy came to be surrounded by numerous shells of stars may give clues about how it evolved. Embedded in the diffuse shells are massive globular clusters of stars -- stars which analyses show were born during three different epochs. This and other data indicate that PGC 42871 has been in at least two galactic collisions, at least one of which might have been with a former spiral galaxy. The remaining spiral galaxy on the far left is at the same distance as PGC 42871 and may have been involved in some of the collisions. PGC 42871 spans about 20 thousand light years and lies about 270 million light years away toward the constellation of Centaurus.
Click to expand...
 
Pixie of key said:
English is not my mother language.

So, for me is better tell idea with video.

If you dont want to look my video, it is ok.

Dont look, dont comment any way.

Thanks.

😃
Click to expand...

Pixie of key, have you ever considered that it is in factual accuracy where your assertions fail and not simply language or the media used to present them? Most of the criticisms found on this thread relate directly to the lack of factual accuracy in your assertions and not the language or the media used to present them.
 
A "I Found Out Reason" lie because that is another deluded and lying video

Pixie of key said:
I Found Out Reason for Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados.
Click to expand...
A "I Found Out Reason" lie because that is yet another deluded and lying video

Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on "Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados"
  • Usual particles from galaxy center, expanding matter, pushing force, etc. delusions.
  • Usual ignorant, unsupported fantasies.
  • Fixes his average orbital period (is 341) which is still stupid and irrelevant.
  • Expanding Jupiter and Earth insanity = hurricanes and tornadoes.
This is a hurricane.
This is a tornado.

Based on the delusions and lies listed in: Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on sunspots.
 
Persistent lie and posts a lying video yet again

Pixie of key said:
Expanding space is naked empire!
Click to expand...
Persistent ""Expanding space is naked empire" lie and posts the "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" lying video from Mar 21, 2017 yet again.

This is a lying rant that The Man cannot explain expanding spacetime when this is easily available textbook physics that The Man has posted several times over the last few years.

Expansion of the universe
 
Researchers use the Large Millimeter Telescope to observe a powerful molecular wind in an active spiral galaxy

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-large-millimeter-telescope-powerful-molecular.html

"Yun says that the LMT, which is operated jointly by UMass Amherst and INAOE, is uniquely suited for detecting a faint, broad line like this observational result and is designed specifically for this type of experiment. "Understanding how frequently the central supermassive black hole disrupts its host galaxy through a yet unknown energetic feedback process is one of the most important unanswered questions in the study of galaxy evolution today, and the LMT with its full 50-meter surface that was just completed, should yield more insights in the coming observing seasons," he says

Anna Lia Longinotti of the INAOE, who led the research, says "The novelty of this result is that we are seeing feedback in a galaxy where this phenomenon is not expected. The other two galaxies where it was observed are more dust- and gas-rich, whereas this galaxy is a spiral type, therefore more similar to the Milky Way. This discovery opens the path to explore the possibility that active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback can be produced also by less luminous objects with different characteristics.""

Galaxys born inside to outside!

Expanding space is naked empire!

😃
 
Pixie of key said:
Researchers use the Large Millimeter Telescope to observe a powerful molecular wind in an active spiral galaxy

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-large-millimeter-telescope-powerful-molecular.html

"Yun says that the LMT, which is operated jointly by UMass Amherst and INAOE, is uniquely suited for detecting a faint, broad line like this observational result and is designed specifically for this type of experiment. "Understanding how frequently the central supermassive black hole disrupts its host galaxy through a yet unknown energetic feedback process is one of the most important unanswered questions in the study of galaxy evolution today, and the LMT with its full 50-meter surface that was just completed, should yield more insights in the coming observing seasons," he says

Anna Lia Longinotti of the INAOE, who led the research, says "The novelty of this result is that we are seeing feedback in a galaxy where this phenomenon is not expected. The other two galaxies where it was observed are more dust- and gas-rich, whereas this galaxy is a spiral type, therefore more similar to the Milky Way. This discovery opens the path to explore the possibility that active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback can be produced also by less luminous objects with different characteristics.""

Galaxys born inside to outside!
Click to expand...


The article you cite makes no such claim.


Pixie of key said:
Expanding space is naked empire!

😃
Click to expand...

The article you cite makes no such claim.

Again why do you continue to spam the thread with articles that at best simply don't support your claims and at worst directly refute them?
 
Usual lies and gibberish about a science article: observing a powerful molecular wind

Pixie of key said:
Researchers use the Large Millimeter Telescope to observe a powerful molecular wind in an active spiral galaxy

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-large-millimeter-telescope-powerful-molecular.html

"Yun says that the LMT, which is operated jointly by UMass Amherst and INAOE, is uniquely suited for detecting a faint, broad line like this observational result and is designed specifically for this type of experiment. "Understanding how frequently the central supermassive black hole disrupts its host galaxy through a yet unknown energetic feedback process is one of the most important unanswered questions in the study of galaxy evolution today, and the LMT with its full 50-meter surface that was just completed, should yield more insights in the coming observing seasons," he says

Anna Lia Longinotti of the INAOE, who led the research, says "The novelty of this result is that we are seeing feedback in a galaxy where this phenomenon is not expected. The other two galaxies where it was observed are more dust- and gas-rich, whereas this galaxy is a spiral type, therefore more similar to the Milky Way. This discovery opens the path to explore the possibility that active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback can be produced also by less luminous objects with different characteristics.""
Click to expand...
Usual lies and gibberish about a science article (observing a powerful molecular wind).
 
Pixie of key said:
How rockplanets cycle Sun

https://youtu.be/1Pat13nz2FI

Short cycle Found 2015 = 330 days.

I predict is going to be 340,75 days.

Check out video and ask if you dont understund.

😃
Click to expand...

No thanks, planetary orbits have been well understood for some 400 years.


So you "predict" what was already "Found" in "2015" and still get it wrong. Why would your incorrect average period only apply to "2015"?
 
A video insanely ignoring centuries of astronomy (planetary orbits and sunspots)

Pixie of key said:
How rockplanets cycle Sun...
Click to expand...
A video insanely ignoring centuries of astronomy (planetary orbits and sunspots).

States "they already find a short cycle for the sun - storms every 330 days". Source is "science news 2015" :eek:! He is too ignorant to give a real source so: Seasonal, Year-Long Cycles Seen on the Sun
This is a proposed cycle in changes in bands of strong magnetic field on the Sun.

The stupidity of taking the average of measured orbital periods as if that means anything. This is not a planetary position cycle. The planets have different periods! It is closer to multiplying the periods together that gives when the planets line up.
If he wanted to see when rocky plainest were all on one side of the Sun then he would learn about real orbits and how the planets align. The three inner planets have a chance of roughly lining up every 39.6 years :jaw-dropp!

Uses the rest of his delusions, that stupidity and abysmal ignorance to make up a "Sunstorms cycle is 340,75 days" delusion.
We have centuries of observations of sunspots and the Sun. Even Wikipedia has a daily sunspot number graph starting at 1983! He could get sunspot or solar data and analyze it to see if there is such a cycle.
 
Last edited:
How rockplanets cycle Sun

https://youtu.be/1Pat13nz2FI

Short cycle Found 2015 = 330 days.

I predict is going to be 340,75 days.

Check out video and ask if you dont understund.

.

Yes, this all mide be too much for you.

Yours picture of universe is going to collapse.

You cant handle it.

Sorry about that.

But thats the way it is.

😃
 
What drives the solar cycle?
March 30, 2015 by David Dickinson, Universe Today

https://phys.org/news/2015-03-solar.html

"There are ideas out there that Jupiter drives the solar cycle. A 2012 paper suggested just that. It's an enticing theory for sure, as Jupiter orbits the sun once every 11.9 years.

And a recent paper has even proposed that Uranus and Neptune might drive much longer cycles…


Color us skeptical on these ideas. Although Jupiter accounts for over 70% of the planetary mass in the solar system, it's 1/1000th as massive as the sun. The barycenter of Jupiter versus the sun sits 36,000 kilometres above the solar surface, tugging the sun at a rate of 12.4 metres per second.

I suspect this is a case of coincidence: the solar system provides lots of orbital periods of varying lengths, offering up lots of chances for possible mutual occurrences. A similar mathematical curiosity can be seen in Bode's Law describing the mathematical spacing of the planets, which to date, has no known basis in reality. It appears to be just a neat play on numbers. Roll the cosmic dice long enough, and coincidences will occur. A good test for both ideas would be the discovery of similar relationships in other planetary systems. We can currently detect both starspots and large exoplanets: is there a similar link between stellar activity and exoplanet orbits? Demonstrate it dozens of times over, and a theory could become law."

Interesting, but today physics cant explain with today model an atoms how planets cycle Sun

Short cycle because of rockplanets.

Long cycle begause of Jupiter and other gas planets mess up the cycle.

They expedite the upward penetration of the superimposed object bubbles of the Jupiter and the galaxy center, thus reaching the expanding and magnetic dribbles that emerge.

and thus they penetrate the Sun's surface every 11 years.

and sometimes not for a long time at all.

&#55357;&#56835;
 
Last edited:
Jupiter-like dwindles alone are not enough.

There is a need for disturbances of the dark matter originating from the center of the galaxy where supermassive concentration that transmit the pushing force away from the center of the galaxy

Then there is a need for Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, so that these others accelerate within the Sun at a certain depth toward the rising surface of the Sun's surface at the expense of the expanding bubbles of the Jupiter to the surface of the Sun to reach above,

This is how the sun's surface will expand into evergreen trees, about 11 years long, but then they can go up to 70 to 90 years without being pushed at all.

It is essential that the expanding matrix of the Jupiter's influence is approaching the Sun's surface at least for hundreds of years.

And that Jupiter's influence goes far deeper than other gas planets.

These arguments can be explored by observing when other gas planets have been on the same side of the Sun on the other side of the galaxy center.

Neptune has 30 to 50 years in its construction site.

Uranus 15 to 25 years.

Saturn 5 - 10

And Saturn reaches into its construction site again for Neptune's help.

Sometimes Saturn begins, Uranus continues, and when Uranus stops, Saturn reappears in that area on the other side of the Sun as the center of the galaxy.

&#55357;&#56835;

Jupiterista peräisin olevat tihentymät eivät yksin riitä.

Tarvitaan galaksin keskustan supermassiivisesta kohteesta peräisin olevia pimeän aineen tihentymiä jotka välittävät työntävää voimaa pois päin galaksin keskustasta

Sitten tarvitaan Saturnuksen, Uranuksen ja Neptunuksen oma osuus siten että nämä muut kiihdyttävät Auringon sisällä tietyssä syvyydessä kohti Auringon pintaa työntymässä olevien Jupiterin aikaan saamien laajenevien ainekuplien vauhtia kohti Auringon pintaa, jolloin ne saavuttavat edellä työntyviä jne.

Näin Auringon pinnalle työntyy laajenevia ainekuplia pitkän aikoo noin 11 vuoden välein, mutta sitten voi mennä jopa 70 - 90 vuotta ettei niitä työnny ollenkaan.

Oleellista on se että Jupiterin vaikutuksen takia syntyneitä laajenevia ainekuplia on työntymässä kohti Auringon pintaa ainakin satojen vuosien viiveellä.

Ja se että Jupiterin vaikutus ylettyy aika paljon syvemmälle kuin muiden kaasuplaneettojen.

Näitä väitteitä voidaan tutkia tsekkaamalla milloin muut kaasuplaneetat ovat olleet yhtä aikaa sillä puolella Aurinkoa joka on toisella puolella kuin galaksin keskusta.

Neptunus ehtii olla työmaa-alueellaan 30 - 50 vuotta.

Uranus 15 - 25 vuotta.

Saturnus 5 - 10

Ja Saturnus ehtii työmaa-alueelleen vielä uudestaan Neptunuksen avuksi.

Joskushan Saturnus aloittaa, Uranus jatkaa ja kun Uranus lopettaa, ehtii Saturnus uudestaan tuolle alueelle joka on toisella puolella Aurinkoa kuin galaksin keskusta.


��
 
Last edited:
NOTE !!!

Sunspots and the Sun's short cycle are proof that the planets are expanding.

And focus on expanding pushing force into the expanding Sun.

Just as the supermassive object of the galaxy center targets the pushing force of the Stars and the planets that are expanding all the time.

&#55357;&#56835;
 
Last edited:
 
Last edited:
his new stupid delusions abut the Sun and stupidity that planets "cycle" the Sun

Pixie of key said:
What drives the solar cycle?
March 30, 2015 by David Dickinson, Universe Today

https://phys.org/news/2015-03-solar.html

"There are ideas out there that Jupiter drives the solar cycle. A 2012 paper suggested just that. It's an enticing theory for sure, as Jupiter orbits the sun once every 11.9 years.

And a recent paper has even proposed that Uranus and Neptune might drive much longer cycles…

Color us skeptical on these ideas. Although Jupiter accounts for over 70% of the planetary mass in the solar system, it's 1/1000th as massive as the sun. The barycenter of Jupiter versus the sun sits 36,000 kilometres above the solar surface, tugging the sun at a rate of 12.4 metres per second.

I suspect this is a case of coincidence: the solar system provides lots of orbital periods of varying lengths, offering up lots of chances for possible mutual occurrences. A similar mathematical curiosity can be seen in Bode's Law describing the mathematical spacing of the planets, which to date, has no known basis in reality. It appears to be just a neat play on numbers. Roll the cosmic dice long enough, and coincidences will occur. A good test for both ideas would be the discovery of similar relationships in other planetary systems. We can currently detect both starspots and large exoplanets: is there a similar link between stellar activity and exoplanet orbits? Demonstrate it dozens of times over, and a theory could become law."
Click to expand...
Followed by his new stupid delusions about the Sun and stupidity that planets "cycle" the Sun when what he cites is arguments that they do not :jaw-dropp!
 
Also Video for that

https://youtu.be/mewXaL5Ecag

😀

Jupiter-like dwindles alone are not enough.

There is a need for disturbances of the dark matter originating from the center of the galaxy where supermassive concentration that transmit the pushing force away from the center of the galaxy

Then there is a need for Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, so that these others accelerate within the Sun at a certain depth toward the rising surface of the Sun's surface at the expense of the expanding bubbles of the Jupiter to the surface of the Sun to reach above,

This is how the sun's surface will expand into evergreen trees, about 11 years long, but then they can go up to 70 to 90 years without being pushed at all.

It is essential that the expanding matrix of the Jupiter's influence is approaching the Sun's surface at least for hundreds of years.

And that Jupiter's influence goes far deeper than other gas planets.

These arguments can be explored by observing when other gas planets have been on the same side of the Sun on the other side of the galaxy center.

Neptune has 30 to 50 years in its construction site.

Uranus 15 to 25 years.

Saturn 5 - 10

And Saturn reaches into its construction site again for Neptune's help.

Sometimes Saturn begins, Uranus continues, and when Uranus stops, Saturn reappears in that area on the other side of the Sun as the center of the galaxy.

Video for that

https://youtu.be/mewXaL5Ecag

😀
 
Repeats his deluded 341 days cycle

Pixie of key said:
It is 341 days cycle with one skip day with every four years.
Click to expand...
That is your deluded 341 days cycle.

The real proposed cycle is 330 days in the activity of solar magnetic belts based on real data from the Sun.
  1. A video insanely ignoring centuries of astronomy (planetary orbits and sunspots).
    He has a "341 days cycle" delusion from the stupidity of an average orbital period.
    A real proposed cycle is 330 days in the activity of solar magnetic belts based of real data from the Sun.
  2. Video of a lying rant that The Man cannot explain expanding spacetime when this is easily available textbook physics that The Man has posted several times over the last few years.
  3. Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on "Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados"
  4. Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on sunspots.
 
Last edited:
Reposts his deluded and lying "Maunder Minimum", etc. video.

Pixie of key said:
Also Video for that
Click to expand...
Reposts his deluded and lying "Maunder Minimum", etc. video.

  1. A video insanely ignoring centuries of astronomy (planetary orbits and sunspots).
    He has a "341 days cycle" delusion from the stupidity of an average orbital period.
    A real proposed cycle is 330 days in the activity of solar magnetic belts based of real data from the Sun.
  2. Video of a lying rant that The Man cannot explain expanding spacetime when this is easily available textbook physics that The Man has posted several times over the last few years.
  3. Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on "Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados"
  4. Yet another insanely deluded and lying video from him on sunspots.
 
The supermassive object of the Galactic Center is expanding and "radiating" to us a dark substance that conveys a pushing force out of the center of the galaxy.

In the sun there is an expanding pushing force inside them that causes them to expand into the detectable substance which then protrudes into the Sun's surface.

Sunsets from Jupiter collide with the Sun when Jupiter is on the opposite side of the Sun in relation to the center of the galaxy.

By the way.

The dark matter does not pulling to anything.

Curving space is naked empire.

Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force which have a nature of electrons and nature of expanding light.

Expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom