There is a new branch of QM waiting to be discovered named "Physicality"
How do I show a single state trying to cross a potential well has less frequency oscillation instead of more?
Holographic Mass, frequency oscillation, and when forces intervene are all major suspects in this investigation.
Holographic Mass: quantum wave mass in the form of information
https://scitechdaily.com/gravity-my...nature-of-the-universe-wrong-this-whole-time/
Mass in usual potential well equations is not physical mass. That is why I bring up holographic particles. They are unobserved and might be the missing piece.
<a|a> =1
post operations wavefunction
a*c0 <0|0>
c0 = 1, c1 = 0
<0|0>=1
the single state can be fed into potential well
That single state is the same as an observed particle, decoherence. And with it comes the inability to tunnel. Does it naturally have a frequency of ground state? You need energy to tunnel so without frequency oscillation from a wave ..it isn't going to go anywhere.
The kinetic energy is open to forces (because it is a single state - observed) and the mass is physical, so the potential well acts on it. Kinetic energy is constant if it was a quantum wave. Unobserved quantum waves are immune to forces.
Is this frequency oscillation I'm asking about the same thing as "Quantum Harmonic Oscillation"? And that zero point vibration, uncertainty, isn't enough to allow a classical particle (normalized single state) to tunnel?
Symmetry is related to forces, so is there a connection to a difference between coherence and decoherence?
Non-zero probability is a wave only activity. A particle in duality is not going to tunnel because the quantum field only has the ability to make it ageless at that point.
In more detail, the calculations show that if atoms are treated as classical particles, that is, as simple points in space, many distortions of the structure tend to
lower the energy of the system.
https://scitechdaily.com/record-superconductor-sustained-by-atomic-quantum-fluctuations/
My goal is an equation that says observed particles do not tunnel. No, you only assume a physical particle has tunneled. Observing a particle after it has ended its journey is not causing it to decohere in flight. It wasn't physical in flight. Nature didn't consider it observation.
!