View Single Post
Old 6th September 2006, 08:55 PM   #554
Christopher7
Philosopher
 
Christopher7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,538
R Mackey: I was wrong about the NIST report mentioning the debris damage.
I was refering to the summary on pg 50 but i was wrong . They refered to the debris damage there too.
I apologise and i stand corrected.

However in re-reading the report i noticed a cunndrum.

On pg 8: Note the location of the lobby is in the area supposidly destroyed by debris.
On pg 18: "Damage to the south face was described by a number or individuals. While the accounts are mostly consistent, there are some conflicting descriptions:
-middle 1/4 to 1/3 width of the south face was gouged out from floor 10 to the ground
-
-
-
At 12:10 to 12:15 p.m.:
* Firefighters found individuals on floors 7 & 8 and led them out of the building
*
*
* No heavy debris was observed in the lobby area as the building was exited, primairly white dust coating and black wires hanging from celing areas were observed
Christopher7 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top