Stundie Nominations for February 2008!

mrwronggt13 said:
Here's RMackey:



source

The age of an argument has zero to do with its correctness.

The government hasn't come up with anything new on 9/11 for years. Have they essentially forfeited the contest?
Click to expand...

Strange that you should mention this just a couple of days after Ace Baker makes a blog post saying exactly the same thing.

Do you think for yourself at all?

What do you make of Ace's continued and rather sad obsession with this forum and his pathetic attempts to get attention?
 
Heiwa said:
Wrong, me? When?
Click to expand...

That's pretty good all by itself, but we have a two-fer in this post:

Heiwa said:
Recommended reading is then

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dense_Inert_Metal_Explosive .

If several DIME 250 kgs bombs were planted in WTC by criminal perpetrators as part of an inside job, you only need one at every 3rd floor i.e. total say 30 or 40 to get the expected result!! Quite a lot 7500-10000 kgs but easy to smuggle in in paper boxes one at a time. Quick installation job, thus.
Click to expand...

No further comment necessary.
 
A couple of juicy ones from CB_Brooklyn

Why do I frequently reply in Douglas' posts? Simple: It disgusts me to see someone promoting propaganda. It doesn't matter that it's Bill Douglas. It's the constant promotion of propaganda that bugs me.
Click to expand...

If that isn’t the pot calling the kettle a kitchen utensil I don’t know what would be.



As I said, the Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery theories are becoming more and more popular. Now that John Hutchison is with us, the entire "free energy" crowd is as well.
Click to expand...

Uh oh, we better watch out, the “free energy” crowd is with them now. What about Tom Bearden? Is he a truther yet? LOL


http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_bill_dou_080215_europe_for_9_2f11_trut.htm
 
Another plagarization from the Scooby Doo script book.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3451745&postcount=538

Miragememories said:
Interestingly, had WTC7 gone 8 hours instead of 7 (after the collapse of WTC1), nightfall would have revealed a building largely shrouded in encroaching darkness and not the flaming lantern that the Official Conspiracy Theorists wish the world to believe.
Click to expand...

The more he posts, the more I believe that he's doing so from a padded cell.
 
From the SLC Myspace, a 'Hobbit' expresses his distate with Bush's ability to appoint every SCOTUS justice:

now obviously you know the supreme court justices are appointed by bush. and the supreme court justice is supposed to judge the outcomes of each case based on the law, but obviously this is not the case.
Click to expand...
 
Allen Rowland takes a classic argument and makes it even stupider.

Jet fuel is essentially refined kerosene. It burns without problem in millions of steel stoves, heaters and furnaces around the world every day. Yet on 9/11, in less than an hour, this innocuous substance MELTED all the massive steel beams of three skyscrapers and caused the structures to collapse like pillars of sand in less than 10 seconds.
Click to expand...

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_allen_l__080219_still_unanswered_9_2f1.htm
 
Alferd_Packer said:
Yet on 9/11, in less than an hour, this innocuous substance MELTED all the massive steel beams of three skyscrapers and caused the structures to collapse like pillars of sand in less than 10 seconds.
Click to expand...

One would think if it were that obvious there'd be no contention as to the WTC collapses being controlled demolition.
 
Alferd_Packer said:
Quote:
As I said, the Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery theories are becoming more and more popular. Now that John Hutchison is with us, the entire "free energy" crowd is as well.
Click to expand...

Uh oh, we better watch out, the “free energy” crowd is with them now. What about Tom Bearden? Is he a truther yet? LOL
Click to expand...


I might as well start making the plaque now. This is a shoe-in to win the 2008 Stundie of the Year award.

Steve S.
 
Alferd_Packer said:
Allen Rowland takes a classic argument and makes it even stupider.

Quote:
Jet fuel is essentially refined kerosene. It burns without problem in millions of steel stoves, heaters and furnaces around the world every day. Yet on 9/11, in less than an hour, this innocuous substance MELTED all the massive steel beams of three skyscrapers and caused the structures to collapse like pillars of sand in less than 10 seconds.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


This is like arguing that no house has ever burned down due to a dropped cigarette.

Steve S.
 
Amanda over at progressiveindependent shows us yet another example of "Truther" physics. Apparently if one object has less mass than another, it cannot penetrate it. This is good news for all those people over in Iraq and Afghanistan who had to worry about being "penetrated" by bullets (which weigh considerably less than their targets).

Amanda said:
This image of flight 175 striking WTC 2 demonstrates how kerosene reacts in a crash. Instead of exploding into a fire ball and tearing the wings off (where the fuel is stored), the kerosene allows the aircraft to enter a steel and concrete building 99 times its own mass totally intact. Pretty cool, huh?
Click to expand...
(emphasis mine)

linky


On Edit: I realize she's being sarcastic - my nomination is about her horrible understanding of physics.
 
Last edited:
Swing Dangler said:
2. Yes, I did email a CD company. She said that "Pull it" was not used within the industry to refer to CD by explosives, however, she confirmed that it was used outside the industry as slang for the CD by explosives of a building.
Click to expand...

I simply could not believe that Swing was serious about saying this. I still can't really believe it. One person in the CD industry is presumed to be an expert on the use of language by everybody outside the industry. Is this an appeal to absence of authority?

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
I simply could not believe that Swing was serious about saying this. I still can't really believe it. One person in the CD industry is presumed to be an expert on the use of language by everybody outside the industry. Is this an appeal to absence of authority?

Dave
Click to expand...

It is used as slang outside the industry, by members of the truth movement.

Sounds like Swing isn't the first conspiracy nut to contact this gal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom