Could WTC 7 have been pulled?

ULTIMA1 said:
Its just too bad that 2 fire chiefs have stated the firemen wer out early in the day, so the how do you pull out firemen who are already out of the buildilng?
Click to expand...

They weren't pulled out of the building, they were pulled from the area around the building.
 
WTC7 was not demo'd by the fire department. They would not try a world record demo of a building with no planning, if it went wrong it could have damaged the buildings around it and made the situation worse.
 
"We've had such tremendous loss of life...the best thing to do was pull it."

How was demolishing a building going to prevent further loss of life?

"Truthers" claim there were no firefighters in the building when Silverstein said "pull it." Maybe Silverstein thought there were still firefighters in the building. Or maybe he meant to pull the operation.

In any case, "truthers" are being typical when they presume to know what others mean by their words. Self interpretation. It's always nefarious of course. Mine is just speculation; good luck getting a "truther" to say that.
 
SatansMaleVoiceChoir said:
So if their motives were pure, and they had all the necessary permissions, why are they still keeping it a secret, 7 years later?
Click to expand...


ULTIMA1 said:
Why don't you ask the people that were there, like i do?
Click to expand...


SatansMaleVoiceChoir said:
So, let me get this straight: you have personally spoken to people on the scene who witnessed the FDNY demolish the building, and none of these people have come forward?
Click to expand...





ULTIMA1 said:
I have e-mailed companies that were at ground zero to find the truth.
Click to expand...


1337m4n said:
And they told you WTC7 was destroyed with explosives?
Click to expand...


ULTIMA1 said:
NO, the main contractor i posted could not answer my questions at the time due to the 9/11 lawsuts.

I have to wait and get back to them.
Click to expand...



What? Not again with the "Oh, I don't have it in my hands yet" crap!
 
Last edited:
PhantomWolf said:
Please provide evidence that the Fire Commander ever used the word "pull" or "pulled".
Click to expand...

Instead of making this request of ULTIMA1, stab yourself in both eyes and under each fingernail. It will save you a lot of pain.
 
parky, why must you antagonize the twoofers with this thread? They are stupid enough as it is.

THINK ABOUT IT TWOOFERS. The fire commander said he wanted to prevent loss of even more life. So, he pulled his crew back and established a collapse zone and moved the public back.

Now, why in the HELL would he want to send people back into a burning building that is completely unstable to attempt to bring it down in a safe manner by taking out a column with explosives? Who placed said explosives? Are firemen trained in this? If not, do firedepartments have demo teams? Do they bring explosives with them to rescue operations? The whole scenario is EXTREMELY stupid.

Why would no one have came forward and said that they demolished it? No one died, so no harm. Grow up twoofers and GET A DAMN LIFE.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Yes since PULLED means bringing down a building, as the fire commander stated.
Click to expand...

That is a lie. Pulled does not mean "bringing down a building."

Show me anyone in demolition that uses pulled or pull it as terms to bring a building down.

So why would a fire commander use a term for demolitioning a building, that is not used by people who demolish buildings?

Perhaps it is you who is misrepresenting what the fire commander said?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I have e-mailed companies that were at ground zero to find the truth.

Why don't you e-mail FDNY to find the truth.
Click to expand...

Wow. You sent emails to 'companies'? Way to go, hero. :rolleyes: So you didn't actually SPEAK to anyone then?

What 'companies' did you email, and what have they got to do with FDNY? I am assuming that YOU haven't emailed FDNY, and you know what? I don't think I am going to bother: I'm pretty content with the fact that the FDNY didn't quickly rig a dangerous burning building for demolition in the space of a few hours (at best), then purposely bring it down and spend 7 years covering it up.

Also, I have better things to do with my time than take the piss out people who work hard for a living by asking them jaw-droppingly stupid and pointless questions.
 
Mince said:
"We've had such tremendous loss of life...the best thing to do was pull it."

How was demolishing a building going to prevent further loss of life?

"Truthers" claim there were no firefighters in the building when Silverstein said "pull it." Maybe Silverstein thought there were still firefighters in the building. Or maybe he meant to pull the operation.

In any case, "truthers" are being typical when they presume to know what others mean by their words. Self interpretation. It's always nefarious of course. Mine is just speculation; good luck getting a "truther" to say that.
Click to expand...
i point this out almost every time this subject comes up, but we dont have a transcript of silversteins conversation with the fire chief, we dont know if he said "pull it" or "pull out" or something else entirely, all we have to go on is silversteins later recollection of the conversation
 
ULTIMA1 said:
How would they pull the fire support if it was already out of the building earlier in the day as stated by Chief Nigro and Chief Hayden?
Why do you disrespect the familes of those who died by spreading lies?
Click to expand...

why do you disrespect and insult the thousands of family members by saying al-qaeda didnt do 9-11?????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom