But if an alleged crime is investigated and the investigators determine that there is not enough evidence to charge someone with, much less punish them for the alleged crime, then it is not a crime.
Not if the investigators are themselves part of the coverup. You are welcome to address the many specific instances I noted where Fiske and Starr LIED about the facts and tampered with evidence in the Foster case. But I note you aren't willing to go near those allegations with a ten foot pole. You just throw out some vague defense instead.
Who is to say snopes is impartial when it comes to Clinton and democrats? I recently proved on this forum that Snopes makes claims they can't back up when they dismiss the allegations regarding William Ayers (
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4173209&postcount=29 ). I have proved several times on this forum that Snopes lied about the Ron Brown case at that very link you provided (
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3910399&postcount=107 ).
So why should we trust Snopes now?
Notice that Snopes doesn't address any of the facts I noted. They simply ignore them, like you are doing. I don't find that very convincing. It makes me suspect the impartiality of Snopes. You say they dismiss this because they say there were three investigations ... one by the coroner, one by Fiske and one by Starr. But Snopes fails to mentions all the questions surrounding the coroner's work. It fails to mention the many facts proving that Fiske LIED in his claims about Foster's supposed depression. It fails to mention that Starr didn't do much more than regurgitate Fiske's lies and that Starr's top investigator even resigned saying the OIC was covering up foul play.
Note that Snopes states "Vince Foster committed suicide on the night of 20 July 1993 by shooting himself once in the head,
a day after he contacted his doctor about his depression." But that claim is untrue. The doctor said Foster contacted him about INSOMNIA and he proscribed medication that was 1/6th the dose normally used to treat depression.
Note that Snopes states "A note in the form of a draft resignation letter was found in the bottom of his briefcase a week after his death" but fails to mention that the briefcase in question was checked earlier in the presence of Park Police and it contained no note. Also unmentioned is that the note was torn into little pieces and that multiple experts say the note is a clear forgery. And unmentioned is the fact that the Police officer who who made the original determination that the note was written by Foster, now says it was NOT. Nor was it mentioned that the note was keep secret for over a day because Hillary didn't even want Bill to know about the note. You see, there's a lot about that note that Snopes conveniently overlooks.
Snopes claims "the 114-page summary of a three-year investigation concluded that Foster shot himself with the pistol discovered in his right hand. There was no sign of a struggle, nor any evidence he'd been drugged or intoxicated or that his body had been moved." What Snopes ignores is that many questions were left unanswered ... many facts simply ignored. Facts that suggest the body was indeed moved and the gun was planted. For starters, check this out:
http://www.fbicover-up.com/proof/index.htm .
You are quite simply wrong.
No, you are not really a skeptic ... at least where matters democrat are concerned.
