February Stundie Nominations

Dave Rogers said:
What can I say? Drop a piece of granite on an egg, and the egg survives?

Dave
Click to expand...

To be fair to Heiwa, I believe he meant that a small piece of something can't destroy a whole something. So, dropping 1/2 of an egg onto another egg, can't destroy that whole egg, ooorrr... the upper (smaller) part of the WTC cannot destroy the rest of the WTC.
 
Biscuit said:
The switch to digital is more diabolical than we thought.



http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread434301/pg1
Click to expand...

dtugg said:
My goodness. That is stupid on so many levels it is amazing. We may have a new leader.
Click to expand...

Skeptic Guy said:
I know that these are just nominations and I normally don't comment, but this has got to be the winner...
Click to expand...

dudalb said:
Game over. This guy wins.
Click to expand...

What's really funny is that, if it were true, it would be an example of the government trying to do something good--provided the reason for needing it is that the aliens are a threat to us.

The other funny thing is that the transmissions aren't ending they're just going to be different. What if the Aliens had no idea we existed since their technology wouldn't know what analog is but they can detect and receive digital?
 
I think this could be a genuine title contender for February.

Christopher7 said:
No.
We know it was thermite because only thermite can melt steel in the first place....

...Thermite melts steel.

It is the only thing known to melt steel outside a foundary.
Click to expand...

I wish they'd taught me that in my metallurgy degree course. Should I ring the old department up and set them straight? Snigger.
 
Dave Rogers said:
What can I say? Drop a piece of granite on an egg, and the egg survives?

Dave
Click to expand...

Well, Dave, to be fair: From the context of his statements, Heiwa meant that dropping a piece of one substance onto a piece of the same substance shouldn't break it. His ultimate point was that the upper and lower sections of the towers are the same mix of materials i.e steel, concrete, etc. We can all recall his silly statements about bales of wool dropping on each other and the like.

Don't get me wrong; it doesn't make his posts any more coherent or sensical. All he's doing is limiting his absurdity to a specific case instead of generalizing it. It's just that, in the interest of accuracy, it's necessary to point out what he was really getting at. That's all. His statements are still worthy of ridicule for other reasons. Many, many other reasons :boggled:.

ETA: Whoops... I see that Bell beat me to it a few days ago. Sorry...:o
 
Last edited:
The NWO takeover could have been accomplished a long time ago if not for all the dog owners ...

antinwo said:
I have noticed that recently there has been a rise in the number of dog attacks. I am starting to wonder if they are going to ban people from owning dogs of a certain size and strength and this is a problem, reaction, solution so we don't have anything that can defend us when the NWO kicks in They are doing the same in america with guns are they going to do this to us in the UK with dogs????
Click to expand...

DI Forums.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the title of the thread is Dog attacks is there a hidden agenda???
 
Last edited:
That is an interesting idea. I am going to drop half of a car onto a whole other car. And the whole car will not be harmed. Right?
 
Mel Odious said:
The NWO takeover could have been accomplished a long time ago if not for all the dog owners ...



DI Forums.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the title of the thread is Dog attacks is there a hidden agenda???
Click to expand...

Is anything NOT a conspiracy to these people?
 
Don't usually hunt for these, but happened upon this one from JFK:

JFK said:
Obviously you have no clue about the layout of the Pentagon vicinity.

I am the one who said it was irreconcilable. And it is. If the plane was north of the CITGO there is no way it could have made contact with those downed light poles.

I suggest you study the area some more.

At this point I really don't give a flying [censored] if the plane impacted the Pentagon or not.

The plane in question could not have had contact with those poles if it was north of the CITGO.

That little fact proves not only a lie, but a conspiracy by our government. End of story.
Click to expand...

I included the entire quote for full context, but the highlighted part is the Stundie. Just remember, the plane hitting the Pentagon is the unimportant part.:jaw-dropp

Found here:

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/1212539/1/
 
This little quote is a response to suspicions about the Hudson water landing:

webfairy said:
Posted: Feb 12 2009, 07:00 AM

Paranoid suspicion about every real thing discredits no planers.
Click to expand...

(source.)

:dl:
 
Smackety said:
I don't get it. Isn't that true?
Click to expand...
the webfairy IS a no planer, in that context her quote means that paranoid suspicion about real events (hudson water landing) discredits their legitimate suspicions about fake events (WTC planes)
 
Heiwa said:
The first failures would be arrested at once, which I clearly describe. No crush-down is possible. And that applies to all steel structures! You cannot destroy a steel structure by dropping a piece of it from above on itself!
Click to expand...

Another attempt...bolding by author.I think it speaks for itself.(This is about WTC7!)
 
8bitagent. over at LCF (post #34 HERE) chews the conspiracy cud concerning the Buffalo Aircrash. After a little numerology:-



8bitagent said:
.....in numerology terms, this would be Flight 77(3407=3+4 + 0+7)
Click to expand...


He tops this with:-


8bitagent said:
.....Yankee's Star pitcher Cory Lidle crashes his small plane into the upper floors of a New York City highrise on 10/11/06, which some say is 9/11/01 written upside down. He happens to crash into the same apartment as the woman who was almost killed by a giant Cat in the Hat Macy's day parade baloon run amok 7 years prior.
Just one of those "hmmmm".
Click to expand...


The "Giant Cat in the Hat Macy's Day Parade Baloon" incident shall henceforth go down in history as the most heinous Black Op concieved by the evil NWO. God help us.

BV
 
bonavada said:
The "Giant Cat in the Hat Macy's Day Parade Baloon" incident shall henceforth go down in history as the most heinous Black Op concieved by the evil NWO. God help us.
Click to expand...


Not to mention that he's got the "date written upside down" thing all wrong. The date 09/11/01 written upside down is just 06/11/01. You need to flip it, and even then it comes out as 10/11/60.

We've got a hint at the future here, folks. Something's going down in 2060. :tinfoil
 
According to one Dereck Wince on Facebook, two commercial airliners hitting two of the busiest buildings in the world (then having them collapse), is by no means devasating enough for one to assume a reasonably high deathtoll.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?p...211830485&aid=-1&id=1355335902&oid=2211830485

:boggled:

"Also, how did Silverstein know there was "terrible loss of life" at the time the decision was made "to pull IT"? Obviously, he knew there was an incredible loss of life AFTER THE FACT when doing the particular interview, but not at 5pm on 9/11. NOBODY knew how many people had died by that point, they could only make a guess..." -Derek Wince
 
Last edited:
Hey, that's good. That would have gone over well.

"I'm assuming no great loss of life--based on the theory there was a secret matter teleporter in the towers that the jumpers were ignorant of--and I am instead assuming this is merely a matter of real estate vandalism."
 
KreeL said:
Mackey, I must assume since you put up Bazant's bio, that you realize that Bazant is very familiar with nano-thermite research and applications? Wouldn't someone that was trying very hard to come up with new physics look to something he is more familiar with? Something, like perhaps, spray on nano-thermite that he was privy to in the nineties? Come to think of it, weren't the cores sprayed with 'fireproofing' not too long before 9/11? Couldn't the fireproofing had been something else? Something that would still be reacting with the steel beams in the debris piles for days, or even weeks afterwards?
Click to expand...

KreeL said:
Spray-on nano-thermite makes no sense? Why not? If you were going to deceptively destroy the WTC you would have to disconnect the cores in a manner that didn't look like a nuclear weapon. You would need something that wouldn't require two hundred guys carrying in massive amounts of explosives. Something that could be masked quite easily as a 'fireproofing upgrade'.
Click to expand...

I suspect we have here Stundie the second... and soon to come Heiwa-type experiments version 2.0.
 
metamars said:
Daniel Ganser, author of NATO's Secret Armies, has interviews linked to here, where he spends some time discussing 911.


Although I don't know where Ganser gets this figure from, it seems wholly credible, and if that's the case, it just goes to show you how much work needs to be done to reverse the 'brain washing' - i.e., internalized belief systems and frames that have been deliberately inflicted on the masses - to achieve an honest government. (Honest governments don't murder their own citizens, nor allow them to be murdered, nor do they kill hundreds of thousands of foreigners in the name of "freedom and democracy", when that is hardly the real goal.)
Click to expand...

[bolding mine, and the Stundie nomination]
 
Ha! I guess figures from nowhere are considered credible if they confirm your beliefs.
 
Elizabeth I said:
That's what I thought..."Sources? Sources? We don't got to show you no stinkin' sources."
Click to expand...

I should have tried that in college. "Sorry Professor but these figures seemed entirely credible to me so I see no reason to divulge their origin to you."
 
Travis said:
I should have tried that in college. "Sorry Professor but these figures seemed entirely credible to me so I see no reason to divulge their origin to you."
Click to expand...



metamars should have tried that in College too. Then maybe he would have learned why it's a bad idea.
 
Horatius said:
metamars should have tried that in College too. Then maybe he would have learned why it's a bad idea.
Click to expand...

But...but then we wouldn't have the Stundie Nomination!

In fact the entire continued existence of the Stundies is predicated on Conspiracy Theorists continuing to be ignorant of what is evidence and what is rational.
 
kappy0405 said:
BUT, everything is a conspiracy theory. It just depends if you believe the governments' (who are notorious for lying) theory... or the logical theories that we all cling too.
Click to expand...

DI Forums.

Well, it's nice to see one of the loons actually come out and say it point-blank ...
 
He gets points for honesty. It's still sad and funny though.
 
Teh Winnar!

ETA: And it just gets better:

Old Bob said:
What a mob of ungreat full b------ Keep on taking canola it's so good. Weather the link is all correct or not the fact is it's G.M. rape seed plant that made mustard gas. Do a bit of hunting yourselves and one day the truth might dawn, I was going to say "will dawn" but in your cases I don't know.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Here's one from KreeL, responding to R.Mackey. I include the entirety of the post R.Mackey made, just so you get the full effect of how ironic it is:


R.Mackey said:
It's like driving past a dog with a broken leg on the side of the road. You just can't without wanting to do something. All right, one last chance for education, and then you're done.


First, take a look at the significant digits in the measurement. We have 2.1 and 2.3. Two significant digits. This means a minimum error of +/- 0.1 is implicit in the measurement itself. So it is possible that both collapses were identical, registering 2.2, but we measured 2.3 and 2.1 due to random error. This would be a valid explanation no matter what we were measuring, be it shaking intensity, length, distance, mass, or the number of people remaining in the Truth Movement.

Next, read this. It tells you how Richter magnitude is actually calculated. Marvel at how inexact the process is.

Then click below:
Did you see where it said the following?

Or, later:

If you didn't, go back and read it again.

And to clarify, that's plus or minus 0.2, or up to 0.4 between two events, at only one standard deviation.

Do you also understand that chaotic events, like collapses coupling to the ground, don't always behave exactly the same way each time? I explained this to you before.

Next, what do you make of the fact that the impacts were also 0.2 MR apart (WTC 1 0.9, WTC 2 0.7)? And that the lesser of the two was WTC 2 in both impact and collapse? Vaguely possible systematic error, maybe terrain effect, that's what you should make of it, though I imagine you have some fantastic excuse for that as well.

And finally, the researchers at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, who computed those estimates, don't see anything suspicious about them at all. What does that tell you? Are you a million times smarter than they are, despite being off by a factor of five in your initial boasts just two days ago?

Learning is not easy. Otherwise, everyone would do it. Give it a try.
Click to expand...

KreeL said:
Your answer is lame.

Try again.
Click to expand...
 
KreeL's the latest bright star in the Stundie sky, isn't he?

KreeL said:
The south tower explodes, but hardly scratches WTC7. The north tower explodes, and from a further distance it nearly knocks WTC7 over by raining thousands of tons of steel onto it.
Click to expand...

Someone claiming to have studied 9/11 in detail doesn't know where WTC7 was. And he's trying to lecture us.

Dave
 
I have high hopes for KreeL. Things have been quiet since Ultima1 got out of Dodge.
 
Yeah, I saw that. Oh well, there are plenty of other good ones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom