Originally Posted by HansMustermann
You should see bridmans accusations, far worse. Accused him of being a creationist, put his work alongside some of the woo-est new earth creationist idiots out there on his website, accused him of being an outright crackpot, and various other extremely disparaging things. I think that Scott calling him a pseudoscientist in return is a rather meagre and polite way of ruturning the favor.
I do notice howvere that you have not once mentioned any of the science
underlying this whole fiasco, and have instead chosen to just comment on scotts closing summary about what he has noticed about Bridmans debunking techniques. Addressing the science
being discussed would be more appropriate I feel, this is the sciecne and technology section afterall.