View Single Post
Old 22nd June 2009, 01:36 AM   #273
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 25,258
29 people who can't figure out 911 so they make up lies and spread their own delusions based on their moronic opinions, hearsay, and stupidity.

I will try to give these "experts" another chance and read the handout from the OP. Oops...

William W. Acri - he used explosives on roads he has no clue about the failure mode of the WTC Towers and has not offered any calculations. I wonder if he read the thousands of pages of the NIST report. No truther can answer this question because they accept these lies from these people who have zero qualifications on studding a high-rise collapse.

Antonio Arthay - building design, zero capabilities in structural engineering since he supports the lies of controlled demolition without evidence.

Anders Bj÷rkman - works with ships - not qualified to make any statements on the WTC and he has proved it.

Jim Bomford - no information on what he did with his civil engineering degree. Maybe he changed light bulbs at the local high school, or calculated road grading. But zero experience in high rise buildings was offered.

Claude Robert Briscoe - he does roads. Why does a road civil engineer make up lies about the WTC?

Ronald H. Brookman - no experience in high-rise building like the WTC. Why does he make up lies about 911?

Frank J. Cullinan - he works on bridges and destroyed a bridge. Why does he fail to understand the gravity collapse and I bet he failed to read or comprehend the NIST report.

Erwin De Jong - wow! Off shore structures and aerospace junk. Zero expertise here for high-rise stuff. Why does he support lies on 911?

Michael T. Donly - the low rise guy on the team. Does low rise mean old houses or something. No real expertise here for understanding the WTC towers.

Rick Fowlkes - nothing offered for his qualifications in working on structures like the WTC towers. Another unqualified person who supports lies about 911.

Bill Genitsaris - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

David G. Huebner - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Edward E. Knesl - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Dennis J. Kollar - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Thomas H. Lackey - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Nathan S. Lomba - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Paul W. Mason - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Travis McCoy - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Dr. Robert T. Mote - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Arthur Nelson - zero expertise in high-rise buildings hit by aircraft.

Kamal S. Obeid - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Howard Pasternack - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

Charles N. Pegelow - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

William Rice - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

JÚr˘me Royer - zero expertise in high-rise buildings. His degree in High energy physics did not help him understand 911. How sad.

Alaa Rustom - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

David Scott - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.
Poor David invokes the moronic statement, "the laws of phyiscs were violated"; the sign of stupidity?
Quote:
"Near-freefall collapse violates laws of physics. Fire induced collapse is not consistent with observed collapse mode . . . ."
What a moronic statement that means nothing.


Clayton J. Simmons - his analyzing and designing water-based infrastructure and residential structures did not help him understand 911. How truthy.

David Topete - zero expertise in high-rise buildings. He has high hopes but no clue on 911.

Clark W. Townsend - zero expertise in high-rise buildings.

No one has experience designing high-rise buildings. Not real experts on 911 issues, just a few fringe people who make up moronic ideas and lies about 911.

No body here can support a single thing these guys say about 911. I tried but their ideas were dumber than dirt when it comes to 911. I was amazed how stupid their ideas were and wondered how they earned a degree in anything. These 29 people are proof you can earn a college degree and still make up lies and dirt dumb ideas on stuff you don't understand due to ignorance, bias, and a propensity to believe nut-case conspiracy theories.

The OP was correct; this seals the deal! If you need a nut case idea on 911, these are the experts who can deliver the dumbest and most moronic ideas you can find on 911.


Last edited by beachnut; 22nd June 2009 at 01:50 AM.
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top