April Stundie Nomination thread

In the context of water vapor being a greenhouse gas:

And now I see why we don't talk science.

No where on this planet is steam a gas. Nowhere.

There's a delicious irony in the "Let's talk science" gang not having a clue what greenhouse gases are.



(Semantically true: that misty stuff we see coming out of a boiling tea kettle's spout, colloquially called 'steam' is a suspension of condensed water droplets. But in context? Water vapo(u)r is not a gas? Yikes.)
 
Not one single professional physicist on Earth agrees with brantc's crackpot notion about the physical makeup of the Sun. (It has a solid iron surface!) And why is it that they are all wrong and he's right? You read it here first (or second if you're following the thread)...

I'm sure I can make up a model and fine tune it to match observations as is done in science commonly these days. I dont do science like that, or at least try not to.
 
Nominating jammonius for his response to a question asking him how he made the leap of faith that a van driving down the street, which was totally different from a van he pointed out in a prior photograph, was the "perps" getting away:



ETA: Whole long post is here, but the last line is the only part I'm nominating.

My irony meter just asploded....

Coming from someone who thinks "wisdom" is a fallacy that is priceless.
 
I posted a link of liquid explosives that would work.
Of course most demolitions experts probably don't even know about the material since it is cloaked in national security.

Cloaked in National Security, but yet he posted a link to the companies webpage??

I'm confused.....
 
1st stundie nomination

911Peacenik said:
they want (someone/anyone) to exfoliate any shred of evidence on the steel.......forever. Any examination of the steel will be riddled with controversy once it leaves the protection of the hanger.

In the comments on their article 'The Port Authority Seeks New Homes for WTC 9/11 Steel' over here http://www.911blogger.com/node/23113



We all know the best way to prevent investigations for evidence of explosives on steel is to make it availible to the public.
 
The government cause earthquakes and terrorist attacks......to prevent Michael Jackson's [Post Humus] comeback....

http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=8355

Hopeless said:
It may be absolutly silly, but i noticed that on some dates we thought Michael comes back there happens a earthquake....to stop it ? To show there power ? I don't know if the earthquakes are made of nature or not...my english isn't good enough to explain...
When 911 happens...Michael and his family are in NY and wanted to do a reunion...it never happens.
It's only a though....weird at all...
But what does Michael know and wanted to say to the world ?

ETA: For the record,they did manage their reunion,the 30th Anniversary concert was recorded before 9/11.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQzoU5UdR7c
 
Last edited:
Plautus Satire said:
I may get into trouble here but I think I remember some statistic like the buildings were designed to stand, with up to like forty percent of the structure removed. It was heavily over-engineered and designed to stand, no matter what. This is why the "pancake" theory is so absurd, it relies on the building being designed to collapse like a house of cards due to gravity, instead of being designed to RESIST the forces of gravity like every single construction on the face of the planet.

Thats right folks the buildings should still be there no matter what.

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/zarathustra-peterjoseph-speaks/page/4

Thanks to Edx for finding this supremely arrogant bawbag.
 
The building could also stand with 95% of its structure removed. Just remove the top 95% of the floors and hey, the rest of the building still stands.
 
In the comments on their article 'The Port Authority Seeks New Homes for WTC 9/11 Steel' over here http://www.911blogger.com/node/23113



We all know the best way to prevent investigations for evidence of explosives on steel is to make it availible to the public.

Heh, "exfoliate" that's nice.

Sooooooo... is he saying the mainstream media are reliable, or that Rense is unreliable? :confused:

That's what I was wondering. I really wish Truthers knew how to write.
 
I tell ya folks this ain't rocket surgery


" Plautus Satire
Member

A successful hijacking is a hijacking where the hijacker successfully hijacks the plane. The two instances referenced in the wikipedia article you cited were both attempted hijackings that were foiled. This is not rocket surgery. "



http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/zarathustra-peterjoseph-speaks/page/6


Its a tautology.
 
Last edited:
I tell ya folks this ain't rocket surgery


" Plautus Satire
Member

A successful hijacking is a hijacking where the hijacker successfully hijacks the plane. The two instances referenced in the wikipedia article you cited were both attempted hijackings that were foiled. This is not rocket surgery. "



http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/zarathustra-peterjoseph-speaks/page/6


Its a tautology.

I think this guy is fake ... his name sure points to it, and there's also this:

This thread isn't really supposed to be about me, but since you brough tit up, that's not all I'm qualified to do. I'm also a medical doctor, and I develop software, I have extensive experience in various construction jobs and demolition work. That's just a small taste of my experience, but it should settle your stomach a little. I'm not just a treecutter, that's just one profession I've held.

Please tell me he's a fake CTist. Please ...

McHrozni
 
okay, i'm going to ahve to wade through this wall of stupid to find some gold here.

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2010/04/why-bushco-should-be-prosecuted-for-911.html

anyone can help me? coz i got 2:
The conclusion consistent with a growing body of peer-reviewed science is this: nothing said by Bush about 911 is true

Bushco's ludicrous cover story is the looniest conspiracy since Ali Baba and his 40 thieves! They, too, were 'co-ordinated' from inside a cave but without cell phones!
 
Bushco's ludicrous cover story is the looniest conspiracy since Ali Baba and his 40 thieves! They, too, were 'co-ordinated' from inside a cave but without cell phones!

Just what is it with the cave thing? Would it be more plausible if OBL had set up home in a hollowed out volcano instead?
 
Just what is it with the cave thing? Would it be more plausible if OBL had set up home in a hollowed out volcano instead?

A still active volcano would be better. ;) Then he could bring his archenemy there and attempt to kill them using the "Unnaturally Slow and Cumbersome Death-Dealing Device"(tm) that our hero can easily escape from!

Yes, I watch too much Austin Powers....
 
A still active volcano would be better. ;) Then he could bring his archenemy there and attempt to kill them using the "Unnaturally Slow and Cumbersome Death-Dealing Device"(tm) that our hero can easily escape from!

Yes, I watch too much Austin Powers....

Better stick with the original (ADHD victims - skip 55 seconds ahead) :

 
First the context:
No witness actually saw any plane, because the missile that hit the Pentagon appoached it at a speed of 2.5 Mach and could hardly be seen at such a speed. Real witnesses (not liars who 'saw everyting' and not liars hired by the FBI to lie to the same effect) saw nothing at all. They believed that generator malfunctioned and exploded. I still have that footage in my personal collection of the 9/11 movies.


Then the stundie:
Sonic boom is when the object reaches the sonic speed, not when it flies at surpersonic speeds. Go study physics first. If I am lier than no point to ask me anything. Go read Report of the 9/11 Commission instead.

As confirmed by subsequent posts, he really is saying that a sonic boom is generated only when an object first reaches the speed of sound (or when flying at exactly Mach 1), and that objects flying faster than Mach 1 are unaccompanied by a sonic boom.
 
Just what is it with the cave thing? Would it be more plausible if OBL had set up home in a hollowed out volcano instead?


'Fictoid #3: The Lair of bin Laden'


"The Lair of Bin Laden is a fictoid that originated in the highly-enterprising British press on November 27th, 2001. ..."

263894bbe5949cb2fa.gif


The story probably reached its high point on NBC's Meet The Press on December 2nd when Tim Russert, the host of the program, provided Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld with the artist's rendering of bin Laden's fortress. The interview proceeded:

Russert: The Times of London did a graphic, which I want to put on the screen for you and our viewers. This is it. This is a fortress. This is a very much a complex, multi-tiered, bedrooms and offices on the top, as you can see, secret exits on the side and on the bottom, cut deep to avoid thermal detection so when our planes fly to try to determine if any human beings are in there, it's built so deeply down and embedded in the mountain and the rock it's hard to detect. And over here, valleys guarded, as you can see, by some Taliban soldiers. A ventilation system to allow people to breathe and to carry on. An arms and ammunition depot. And you can see here the exits leading into it and the entrances large enough to drive trucks and cars and even tanks. And it's own hydroelectric power to help keep lights on, even computer systems and telephone systems. It's a very sophisticated operation.

Rumsfeld: Oh, you bet. This is serious business. And there's not one of those. There are many of those. And they have been used very effectively. And I might add, Afghanistan is not the only country that has gone underground. Any number of countries have gone underground. The tunneling equipment that exists today is very powerful. It's dual use. It's available across the globe. And people have recognized the advantages of using underground protection for themselves.


http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/nether_fictoid3.htm

Give Rummy a Stundie!
 
Last edited:
...Then the stundie:

As confirmed by subsequent posts, he really is saying that a sonic boom is generated only when an object first reaches the speed of sound (or when flying at exactly Mach 1), and that objects flying faster than Mach 1 are unaccompanied by a sonic boom.

Oh, my, that is a Stundie right there. Either that, or he's right and the double sonic boom I've heard as the Shuttle approaches KSC means that it was going slower than sound all the time it came down from orbit, and actually sped up to supersonic speed as it approached the landing pattern...
 
:eye-poppi Sane does it again...

Sane said:
Check out TIME Magazine in full Project Mockingbird mode acting like "missing nukes" are very normal and acceptable, but hero's just like you can do your part to protect us from this false threat they invented.

THEY HAVE NANOTECH IN LIPSTICK! YOU THINK THEY ARE NOT TRACKING EVERY UNANIUM/PLUTONIUM PARTICLE ON THE PLANET?
JAY ROCKEFELLER IS NOT SCARED OF NUKES, HE IS SCARED OF THE INTERNET BECAUSE NO ONE BELIEVES THEIR BS LIES ANYMORE!

THIS IS THE SAME MAGAZINE THAT NAMED BERNANKE MAN OF THE YEAR!

TALK ABOUT THE $28.3 TRILLION THEFT BY ILLUMINATI BANKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=166139.0;topicseen

Just an excellent example of paranoia at it's finest. Not to mention delusions of grandeur. Gotta love how he sets up the "Ha! We broke the story so they were too afraid to go on with their plan!!!!11!"
 
Last edited:
'Fictoid #3: The Lair of bin Laden'

"The Lair of Bin Laden is a fictoid that originated in the highly-enterprising British press on November 27th, 2001. ..."

[...]

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/nether_fictoid3.htm

Give Rummy a Stundie!

A few weeks after the "Meet the Press" interview, US special forces and their Afghan allies occupied Tora Bora. They painstakingly searched Gree Khil mountain and the surrounding area. They found no underground fortress, no hydro-electric power plant, no 2000-room hotel, no ant farm, no iron doors, no ventilating shafts. The troglodyte Lair of Bin Laden turned out to be mythic.

Source?

Have you seen this?

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA444101&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
 
I nominate jammonius for this beauty:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5808098#post5808098
...Posters here have already acknowledged that she looks, not up towards the sky in the presumed direction of a jetliner 1000ft up screaming along at 500mph +/-, but rather, she looks to her side, into City Hall Park and at ground level...

When pressed to quote a single Poster who has acknowledged the "she looks, not up", he find no one, but he finds one poster who acknowledged the exact opposite: the selfsame jammonius in the very OP of the selfsame thread

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5809337#post5809337
...And see my post # 1:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php...00&postcount=1

"The woman on the right walks by and appears to look up a second or two before the collision sound is heard. [...]"

May I borrow the words of the late and great George Carlin:
"When it comes to ********, big time, major league ********, you have to stand in awe - in AWE! - of the all time champion of false promises and exaggerated claims: religion jammonius"
:eusa_wall:
 
Cicero, from here when someone asked for the source of a comment he attributed to Barbra Streisand:
If you don't believe Babs' own comments make her a LIHOPer, why would seeing the original source change your opinion?
He's right home in the CT forum, a much better fit then politics.
 
Last edited:
When pressed to quote a single Poster who has acknowledged the "she looks, not up", he find no one, but he finds one poster who acknowledged the exact opposite: the selfsame jammonius in the very OP of the selfsame thread


That is absolutely amazing...
 
I nominate jammonius for this beauty:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5808098#post5808098


When pressed to quote a single Poster who has acknowledged the "she looks, not up", he find no one, but he finds one poster who acknowledged the exact opposite: the selfsame jammonius in the very OP of the selfsame thread

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5809337#post5809337


May I borrow the words of the late and great George Carlin:
"When it comes to ********, big time, major league ********, you have to stand in awe - in AWE! - of the all time champion of false promises and exaggerated claims: religion jammonius"
:eusa_wall:

And the stundies for April are over...
 
I'm gonna have to call Poe's Law on that one. He's got to be *********** with us, right? Right?
 
This post is Holocaust denialism in a nutshell. No evidence, just flat-out denial.

garethdjb said:
Now, are you absolutely sure that these numbers refer to Jews who were GASSED, or do you think they may refer to total death tolls at those camps by all methods?

The only thing you can be absolutely sure of is that the numbers are pure phantasmagoria, without a shred of evidence to back them up. That's the way it works in the holohoax biz.

It's just pure, unadulterated denier stupidity.
 
Last week I heard someone talking about the Holodomor. It was a word I had never heard before describing an event I don't remember learning about (meaning if I did, it didn't carry much weight). Obviously the holocaust has a special evil all its own in all of human history, but still, it seems like some people have better PR than others. Just a random observation.
 
I'm gonna have to call Poe's Law on that one. He's got to be *********** with us, right? Right?

Of course we can't be sure but if this wins the stundie for the year (and I shudder to think of what could possibly beat it.) I hereby move that Jam is placed in the Pantheon of WTF!?!?!? among the gods of facepalm. Retired due to the sheer fact that the studiferous effort cannot be repeated.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom