It is claimed there are 43 known video clips of the explosion at Tower 2 or WTC2 or the South Tower.
There is a convenient youtuber that contains these 43 known versions available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mc2tfVuaSrg
Looked at as a whole, the compilation that runs for <10min. provides a variety of looks, angles, and degrees of quality concerning what happened to the South Tower.
Posters and Lurkers here know me as a NO PLANER and I know that designation puts me at 6s&7s with most who post here, where it is thought that >80% of you self-identify as 9/11 debunkers and very few of you self-identify as 9/11 truthers and an even smaller percentage self-identify as NO PLANERS even if you self-identify as a truther.
This might, then, be a short thread and there might be little or no interest in pursuing it. It will be possible to post up a still image for use as a "title page" so to speak for each of the 43 versions. I would consider that a group project in which I could participate jointly with others.
We could ask, say, a group of 4 posters to each post up 10 title page stills, for instance.
The first three in the video look like this;
1
2
3
IMHO, one can find more support for the NO PLANE claim when one considers ALL 43 as a group, with some being more consistent with the no plane claim than others. For instance, in a majority of them, it is very apparent that the explosion occurs in the "wrong" place. Basically, there is no explosion upon impact and when an explosion is seen, it is on the opposite sides of the buildings from impact, showing an internal rather than external source of explosion. Thus, the event was pyrotechnic in nature, as a NO PLANER sees it. Note that phrase: as a no planer sees it.
Almost all of you see it differently, probably. However, the drill here is to examine what the video shows. Let me repeat: The drill here is to examine what the video shows. People have the capacity to view information and say what they see and what they hear and draw conclusions from it.
It is likely those who are PLANE SPOTTERS, meaning, of course, they support the viewpoint that Flight 175, a Boeing 767 slammed into the South Tower is supported by all videos. I get that.
No planers, on the other hand, claim no such thing happened. Most people are offended by that. I get that, too.
However, let's look at what the video shows.
Oh, by the way, here's an example of what I mean when I say the explosion is in the wrong place:
The above is but one example of the explosion occurring on the east face of the South Tower with nothing much occurring at the point of impact, as though the tower were made of papermache, rather than structural steel.
OK, if there's interest in discussion we can proceed.
I, personally, am not seeking here to convince anyone of anything. I hope we can look at the information and post up claims about what we see and what we hear in this video compilation, thus making this a discussion about the information and not about beliefs.
There is a convenient youtuber that contains these 43 known versions available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mc2tfVuaSrg
Looked at as a whole, the compilation that runs for <10min. provides a variety of looks, angles, and degrees of quality concerning what happened to the South Tower.
Posters and Lurkers here know me as a NO PLANER and I know that designation puts me at 6s&7s with most who post here, where it is thought that >80% of you self-identify as 9/11 debunkers and very few of you self-identify as 9/11 truthers and an even smaller percentage self-identify as NO PLANERS even if you self-identify as a truther.
This might, then, be a short thread and there might be little or no interest in pursuing it. It will be possible to post up a still image for use as a "title page" so to speak for each of the 43 versions. I would consider that a group project in which I could participate jointly with others.
We could ask, say, a group of 4 posters to each post up 10 title page stills, for instance.
The first three in the video look like this;
1
2
3
IMHO, one can find more support for the NO PLANE claim when one considers ALL 43 as a group, with some being more consistent with the no plane claim than others. For instance, in a majority of them, it is very apparent that the explosion occurs in the "wrong" place. Basically, there is no explosion upon impact and when an explosion is seen, it is on the opposite sides of the buildings from impact, showing an internal rather than external source of explosion. Thus, the event was pyrotechnic in nature, as a NO PLANER sees it. Note that phrase: as a no planer sees it.
Almost all of you see it differently, probably. However, the drill here is to examine what the video shows. Let me repeat: The drill here is to examine what the video shows. People have the capacity to view information and say what they see and what they hear and draw conclusions from it.
It is likely those who are PLANE SPOTTERS, meaning, of course, they support the viewpoint that Flight 175, a Boeing 767 slammed into the South Tower is supported by all videos. I get that.
No planers, on the other hand, claim no such thing happened. Most people are offended by that. I get that, too.
However, let's look at what the video shows.
Oh, by the way, here's an example of what I mean when I say the explosion is in the wrong place:
The above is but one example of the explosion occurring on the east face of the South Tower with nothing much occurring at the point of impact, as though the tower were made of papermache, rather than structural steel.
OK, if there's interest in discussion we can proceed.
I, personally, am not seeking here to convince anyone of anything. I hope we can look at the information and post up claims about what we see and what we hear in this video compilation, thus making this a discussion about the information and not about beliefs.
Last edited:
D) has to say. Interesting find - I wonder why nobody's mentioned him before. 
