Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dutch said:
... The human mind seems to be able to tune in on this hidden underlying Design with intuitive thoughts and noticing synchronicities. ...
Click to expand...

Not so much Dutch.

What you continue to indicate is that your mind is creating these 'intuitive thoughts' and 'syncronicities'.
What you have indicated is that your mind has severe difficulty with reality checking.

'The human mind' does not equate with one single -what you unfortunately appear to display- partly dysfunctional human mind.
 
Mister Earl said:
Not to mention the plethora of problems your HD design system has. I'll rattle a few off the ol' brainpan.

5.) Why doesn't the positions of the planets or time and dates used in your predictions have to be exact? Why do you permit yourself a multi-day buffer?
Click to expand...

It's a recurring issue, why doesn't have to be exact?

For practical reasons in the past, I have limited the timeframe around a determined events day to + or – 1 day, creating in fact a 3 days timeframe. I did so consistently from the beginning of this HDDesign ‘research’, but I have often said that this 3 days timeframe is way to rigid and should in fact be seen as a timeframe of a few days around a determined ‘peak’ date. On the timelines I use 3 days before and after a predetermined date, creating a 7 days timeframe.
While doing this HDDesign ‘research’ I have often noticed a 3 days difference (+ or -) between a predetermined events day and the actual ‘confirmation’ in our reality, there are numerous examples of this in the HDDesign material. This 7 days period of creation (as above – so below) is valid for each single moment in our perception of time. Imagine that you have knowledge about inter-dimensional existence and you have to explain this to an early human, you would probably explain it with a story similar to what has been told in Genesis for instance.
This HDDesign ‘research’ seems to indicate that there’s a hidden underlying Design in our reality, connecting all these single moments in our perception of time. The human mind seems to be able to tune in on this hidden underlying Design with intuitive thoughts and noticing synchronicities. This makes it possible to identify the hidden underlying time coded patterns and underlying themes, while the confirmations must show up instantly when the described elements of HDDesign are applied.
 
If my posts have to be split in halfs, than I am the one to do so.

It is essential that it has been read what I have to tell, otherwise this discussion makes no sense at all

I have to ask your attention for these pre-determined future dates because I think these timeframes will play an important role in relation to the destiny of mankind

Again it's this very ame Pi based Design that unveils the profound messages of the times we live in.

The Deep Impact / Epoxi space mission first unveiled the Pi based Design as explained here with previous posts.

I wrote:

Hyper Dimensional Cube timeframe around November 17, 2010 is coming up, a timeframe already identified years ago as one of the major timeframes in the Design of our times. I expect developments in relation to Yellowstone/mount St. Helens ( HD Cube at macro level) as I have already said years ago and I also expect to come with additional information after the 7 days timeframe of creation opens around November 14, 2010.
Another major timeframe is Earth’s recurring orbital position of the Grand cross around June 26. As I have specifically mentioned in advance: around June 26, 2010, June 26, 2011 or June 26, 2012.

Yesterday I had this intuitive thought to consider these 2 major timeframes of around November 17, 2010 and around June 26, 2011 to be the 2 Pi – timeframes based on this very same Pi based Design as first unveiled by Deep Impact / Epoxi.
With these two Pi points the corresponding timeline starts around March 19, 2008, when Arthur C. Clarke has died ( ‘2010 – the year we make contact’ shows up on the timeline for Q3 2010) and this timeline will end around February 24, 2014.

This is based on Pi.

I found it interesting to see Arthur C. Clarke showing up here, because of his ‘contributions’ with the Inter-Dimensional Contact theme, but also because he died at the end of the 911 based Golden Mean time coded spiral 9/11-Madrid Bombings ( another major time coded pattern as unveiled here in the HDDesign material ).

Because of this link with this major Golden Mean time coded spiral I thought to determine both the Phi points too of this timeline, besides the already determined Pi points.
The instant confirmation as required in the ‘research’ instantly showed up: Both the Golden Mean Phi points were marking the same orbital position of Earth as the 2 Pi points: around June 26, 2010 (Grand Cross orbital position) and around November 17, 2011.

Confirmation by Design……..
Click to expand...

3 of the 4 Pi & Phi points are in the future: around November 17, 2010, around June 26, 2011 and around November 17, 2011. Only this year’s orbital position of the Grand Cross around June 26, 2010 has already passed.

Let’s see if this timeframe around June 26, 2010 could give some kind of confirmation of this hidden underlying Design as first unveiled by the space mission Deep Impact/ Epoxi.

Fasten your seatbelt

The confirmation is instant and unmistaken……..

Spacecraft Deep Impact / Epoxi fly past Earth for the fifth and last time on its way to the mission's ultimate flyby, a close encounter with comet Hartley 2 in November!!! (Around November 4, 2010).

I think it's about time that people will try to get involved with these pre-determined timeframes ahead. When you really are involved, you will be able to comprehend the connectedness as outlined here in the HDDesign material.

I recommend keeping an eye on the timeline during the times ahead. HD Tetrahedron around October 21 is coming up, with a possible first indication in relation to Yellowstone/Mount St. Helens, possibly becoming apparent as seismic activities above 60 degrees North latitude as an indication of a Hyper Dimensional ‘inwelling’ ( followed by a possible HD ‘outwelling’ around HD Cube timeframe November 17 at HD Cube location Yellowstone/Mount St. Helens ).
Additional information will probably follow once the anticipated timeframes are open.
Q4 2010 timeline October, November and December 2010
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about425-hddesign.html
Hyper Dimensional Design material
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/index.php?mforum=hddesign
PS: you don’t have to register; you can login as user ‘reader’ with password ‘reader’.
 
Dutch said:
Inter–Dimensional Contact
Confirmation by Design

When intuition speaks……….

For practical reasons in the past, I have limited the timeframe around a determined events day to + or – 1 day, creating in fact a 3 days timeframe. I did so consistently from the beginning of this HDDesign ‘research’, but I have often said that this 3 days timeframe is way to rigid and should in fact be seen as a timeframe of a few days around a determined ‘peak’ date. On the timelines I use 3 days before and after a predetermined date, creating a 7 days timeframe.

While doing this HDDesign ‘research’ I have often noticed a 3 days difference (+ or -) between a predetermined events day and the actual ‘confirmation’ in our reality, there are numerous examples of this in the HDDesign material. This 7 days period of creation (as above – so below) is valid for each single moment in our perception of time. Imagine that you have knowledge about inter-dimensional existence and you have to explain this to an early human, you would probably explain it with a story similar to what has been told in Genesis for instance.

Edited. Breach of Rule 4. Do not cut and paste lengthy tracts available elsewhere.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
Click to expand...


Why stop at a week, I’m sure you’ll find even more “‘confirmation’”s if you give yourself weeks, months, years, decades, centuries and millenniums worth of wiggle room?

When intuition speaks……….

You listen, because it is just, well, you talking to yourself.
 
Why stop at a week, I’m sure you’ll find even more “‘confirmation’”s if you give yourself weeks, months, years, decades, centuries and millenniums worth of wiggle room?
Click to expand...

The timeframe around November 17, 2010 is determined.

just wait and see
 
The Man said:
I would advise you not to deliberately attempt to circumvent forum rules. Particularly after announcing that is your intent.
Click to expand...


I don't think it was recognized as an answer to a question posted here.

Do you need forum rules to debunk this material?

Question: Have you read this specific post that has been moderated here elsewhere on the internet?
 
Dutch said:
The timeframe around November 17, 2010 is determined.

just wait and see
Click to expand...

See what, specifically? “developments in relation to Yellowstone/mount St. Helens”? That is extremely vague. “a possible first indication in relation to Yellowstone/Mount St. Helens, possibly becoming apparent as seismic activities above 60 degrees North latitude”? Now that is even less specific, as it doesn’t even have to be “developments in relation to Yellowstone/mount St. Helens” just some “seismic activities above 60 degrees North latitude”.


If you simply mean wait and see you dig up some news story from around that date that you will claim as significant to your “timeframe”, well, we’ve seen that before and I’ll surmise that prediction I just gave about what you will do is at least, if not more, accurate and specific as either of yours.
 
Dutch said:
I don't think it was recognized as an answer to a question posted here.
Click to expand...

The admonishment stands.

Dutch said:
Do you need forum rules to debunk this material?
Click to expand...

Nope, but this forum does have rules and the admonishment stands.

Dutch said:
Question: Have you read this specific post that has been moderated here elsewhere on the internet?
Click to expand...

Nope, nor would I be inclined to do so, but that is just me.
 
like I said,

wait and see

especially when to timeframe is open, from November 14 on that is
 
Nope, nor would I be inclined to do so, but that is just me
Click to expand...
.

could be useful, if you want to know what you are talking about

how can I take your critisism serious if you don't even read it?
 
Dutch said:
.

could be useful, if you want to know what you are talking about
Click to expand...

Why, it evidently hasn't helped you "to know what you are talking about"?

Dutch you have clearly demonstrated that you don't know what you’re talking about, particularly when it comes to anything involving more than one dimension.

Dutch said:
how can I take your critisism serious if you don't even read it?
Click to expand...

I'm more than happy to read whatever you post here as that has been demonstrated to be more than sufficient for serious criticisms of your Dimensional Design Hype. So are you just going to gauge what criticisms you will take seriously only by what people assert that they will read or have read on your website? As has been pointed out to you many times before, if you can’t post it here clearly and concisely within the rules of this forum (including not spamming) then it is simply you who is not serious even about criticisms.

Once again you seem to be missing the very important point that it is you who should be seriously critical of what you do. Without that it is unlikely that you will take any criticism seriously regardless of if they have meet your requirements of what they should read, have read or be reading on your website.
 
Dutch said:
If my posts have to be split in halfs, than I am the one to do so.

It is essential that it has been read what I have to tell, otherwise this discussion makes no sense at all.
...
Click to expand...

No it is not essential. You are not that important and you appear to have nothing valuable to say.

There really is no discussion, not about the core of what you are on about. Basically you are just posting loooong tracts of texts which are available on many other forums.
In that sense, you posting here is pointless.
 
Dutch said:
like I said,

wait and see

especially when to timeframe is open, from November 14 on that is
Click to expand...

So you just don't know what will happen, but feel certain that you can find something when your "timeframe is open" to your speculations "from November 14 on that is"?
 
The Man said:
So you just don't know what will happen, but feel certain that you can find something when your "timeframe is open" to your speculations "from November 14 on that is"?
Click to expand...

That's nothing.
In a post above he says the moderated post is significant, whereas in the same post he says he doesn't know the significance...it will still have to become clear. :rolleyes:
 
Wow, just checking in ....yep wide open 'prediction' which our old friend Dutch will determine is right or wrong based on a criteria and parameter known only to him and a dead Hindu outside of Meerut.

I predict he'll have a hit!
 
Dutch said:
The timeframe around November 17, 2010 is determined.

just wait and see
Click to expand...

You are waiting to see too.You will find some news story and link it to your fantasy.Not very impressive.You could impress me by telling me exactly what will happen,but you can't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom