Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mister Earl said:
[snip] ... your own forums where you have the ability to crush dissenting views, retroactively alter your posts, and perform other blase' tricks. I believe that HDD is nothing more than taking your standard psychic and dressing it up and fancy psuedoscientific terms. It's been four or five years of the same thing, Dutch.
Click to expand...
Do you have evidence that Dutch actively alters his posts after the fact?
 
Blue Mountain said:
Do you have evidence that Dutch actively alters his posts after the fact?
Click to expand...

No, but as he's the administrator there, he has the ability to, which was the point of my post. We've seen him retroactively try to shoehorn hits in here and on the BAUT forums before he was banned. And in this same timespan, he's tried a number of times to carry the discussion to his own personal forums, which I will not do.
 
not once have I done that, not here, not in the HDDesign material, nowhere else on the internet in thousands of posts!!!!

On May 29, 2008 NASA’s Deep Impact / Epoxi spacecraft created a video of the moon transiting ..... I have deleted the rest because otherwise this post get moderated again. Its about this Pi based design I have talked about here at JREF'shttp://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/30/100-percent-chance-for-life-on-newly-found-planet/?hpt=T2
Click to expand...
Well, well, well..........
Today it's November 1, 2010, and the timeframe around November 4 when spacecraft Deep Impact / epoxi will fly by comet Hartley 2 opens up.
3 days in advance and again something amazing just has happened to me.
I was making fresh orange juice when I got this sudden insight.

( notice this 3 days in advace again, I refer to it very often )

If this Pi expression is indeed valid, as explained in the above post, than the moment of the actual flyby with comet Hartley 2 must have been chosen deliberately in order to express the very same pi based Design ( consciously, as a mean to 'communicate' ) or in case the flyby with Hartley 2 wasn't deliberately planned for November 4 and this very same pi based Design shows up indeed, than it would be an unmistaken indication of hidden intelligent design in our reality .

( so please reread the related posts here on this thread at JRE's if you don't know about this Pi based design )

I thought Deep Impact on comet Temple I on July 4, 2005 and the actual flyby of spacecraft Deep Impact/epoxi on November 4, 2010 should express Pi in our perception of time
These are the 2 Pi points on a timeline and I expected that this timeline should give confirmation so I checked it
and guess what.......
July 4, 2005 - November 4, 2010 = 1.949 days

The Pi based design as explained ( note that this is the same Pi based design as explained in previous posts ):
1949 x Pi x Pi is total timeline 19.235 days
2 Pi points;
Deep Impact on comet temple I on july 4, 2005 is day 8.643 of this timeline
and
Deep Impact/ epoxi spacecraft flyby comet Hartley 2 is day 10.592 of this timeline
And with this the confirmation with our perception of time shows up:
This timeline starts on a November 4 ( 1981 ) !!!!!
and ends on a July 4 ( 2035 ) !!!!!!
The very same orbital positions of earth at the beginning and the end of this timeline, marking the very same orbital positions of the 2 Pi points!!!
If you think this is just a coincidence, you have to think again!!

This really shows up out of nowhere, giving such a strong confirmation just like that. Instantly.
 
Well, well, well..........


Dutch doesn't care about the current discussion, a quick denial and then straight on to satisfying his pathological need for posting the same stuff he posts elsewhere.
 
Dutch said:
...
This really shows up out of nowhere, giving such a strong confirmation just like that. Instantly.
Click to expand...


Dutch wrote several times that he is not looking for 'synchronicities' or 'intuitive thoughts', examples include:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6394356&postcount=3379
and
http://www.bautforum.com/showthread...erdimensional-Design-quot?p=928070#post928070

In a way he is. Creating them himself.

Dutch presents the order: 'intuitive thought' > 'synchronicity' found.
He thinks about and subjects himself to celestial objects and their various data all the time.
He than goes through a 'matching process' where he chooses and manipulates data in any random (Pi involving) way until he comes across something that he thinks can be presented as interesting or meaningful or 'confirms' (yes, just like Dutch writes this word in quotation marks) his believe...for himself. Abusing Pi makes it sound sciency.

He puts the various data in the order he 'needs' and 'forgets' about the matching proces. An 'intuitive thought' and 'syncronicity' are born.
Saying that he is not looking for 'intuitive thoughts' or 'synchronicities' helps him to pretend there is no such matching process.
No such thing as 'instant', in this context.

He's not here to discuss anything, he's just here to post his little 'trick', over and over and over and over again. The same 'trick' he posts on many different other forums.
Considering his previously displayed contempt for his b.annings and moderating action, I'd say that in my opinion Dutch displays a pathological need for posting this 'trick', in the way he does.
 
Last edited:
Daylightstar said:
Well, well, well..........


Dutch doesn't care about the current discussion, a quick denial and then straight on to satisfying his pathological need for posting the same stuff he posts elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Do you consider it to be a wise idea to completely disregard yet another Pi based expression with this Deep Impact mission?

you are the one who is in denial, unfortunately you are not alone
 
Dutch said:
Do you consider it to be a wise idea to completely disregard yet another Pi based expression with this Deep Impact mission?

you are the one who is in denial, unfortunately you are not alone
Click to expand...

You cannot be in denial of something that does not exist. The onus is on you to prove it exists, which you steadfastly refuse to do. Ultimately, this makes HDD an uninteresting and irrelevant fantasy.
 
Daylightstar said:
Dutch wrote several times that he is not looking for 'synchronicities' or 'intuitive thoughts', examples include:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6394356&postcount=3379
and
http://www.bautforum.com/showthread...erdimensional-Design-quot?p=928070#post928070

In a way he is. Creating them himself.

Dutch presents the order: 'intuitive thought' > 'synchronicity' found.
He thinks about and subjects himself to celestial objects and their various data all the time.
He than goes through a 'matching process' where he chooses and manipulates data in any random (Pi involving) way until he comes across something that he thinks can be presented as interesting or meaningful or 'confirms' (yes, just like Dutch writes this word in quotation marks) his believe...for himself. Abusing Pi makes it sound sciency.

He puts the various data in the order he 'needs' and 'forgets' about the matching proces. An 'intuitive thought' and 'syncronicity' are born.
Saying that he is not looking for 'intuitive thoughts' or 'synchronicities' helps him to pretend there is no such matching process.
No such thing as 'instant', in this context.

He's not here to discuss anything, he's just here to post his little 'trick', over and over and over and over again. The same 'trick' he posts on many different other forums.
Considering his previously displayed contempt for his b.annings and moderating action, I'd say that in my opinion Dutch displays a pathological need for posting this 'trick', in the way he does.
Click to expand...

Nope

I'm just waiting for these intuitive thoughts or synchronicities to happen and the correlations show up instantly when that happens.

Do you really think that it is a coincidence that Pi is expressed twice as explained with this Deep Impact mission with the impact on comet Temple I and the flyby Hartley 2?

by scheduling a fake flyby on october 11 and planning an actual flyby on November 4?

Really?

Can't you understand that is nearly impossible to be just coincidental, as expressed with these 3 unusual manmade spaceevents?

Deep Impact on Tempel I - Deep Impact earth Moon Transit - Deep Impact flyby Hartley

Expressing Pi as explained not once ( which is already unmistaken intelligent )

but twice?

Are you smart enough to understand the exceptional intelligent expressing that is yelling at you?

Why do you keep on dismissing this?

Why don't you try for yourselves for a while , you will understand the difference with this HDDesign material.
 
Mister Earl said:
You cannot be in denial of something that does not exist. The onus is on you to prove it exists, which you steadfastly refuse to do. Ultimately, this makes HDD an uninteresting and irrelevant fantasy.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that these Pi expressions with the Deep Impact space mission aren't there? and not in the orbot of Steins and not in the orbit of Phobos?
 
Can you predict things with any precision ahead of time? No. Do you get useful information that can be proactively utilized? No. Can HDD be used in a way helpful to humanity? No. Does HDD even have a framework and guidelines? No. Does HDD have a testable hypothesis? No. Has Dutch ever shown the calculations and groundwork of any of his predictions? No. Has Dutch ever answered any direct, scientific based questions of HDD with the idea of testing this HDD? No.

What else would you like to know?
 
Mister Earl said:
No, but as he's the administrator there, he has the ability to, which was the point of my post. We've seen him retroactively try to shoehorn hits in here and on the BAUT forums before he was banned. And in this same timespan, he's tried a number of times to carry the discussion to his own personal forums, which I will not do.
Click to expand...

Earl, grow up

I have send you a pm after I was banned from BAUT in order to continue the discussion, it didn't matter to me where that would be. I offered you and some others to continue at hddesign forum or elsewhere, but you refused
 
Mister Earl said:
Can you predict things with any precision ahead of time? No.
Click to expand...

for the thousands time: HDDesign is not about exact predictions, its about specific underlying themes that wil find expression at specific moments in our perception of time


Do you get useful information that can be proactively utilized? No
Click to expand...
.

of course, knowledge of our reality will enable us to subtelize it

Can HDD be used in a way helpful to humanity? No.
Click to expand...

I think its the biggest help you can imagine


Does HDD even have a framework and guidelines? No.
Click to expand...
like how?
Does HDD have a testable hypothesis? No
Click to expand...
.

Do you think you can determine the proper set of rules for such a test?
You are way to limited

Has Dutch ever shown the calculations and groundwork of any of his predictions? No
Click to expand...
.

yes, every addition on the timelines is mentioned in a seperate post ( or more) . again, no predictions

Has Dutch ever answered any direct, scientific based questions of HDD with the idea of testing this HDD? No
Click to expand...
.

You want a limited answer to something that goes beyond our current scientific understanding? Don't you see its insufficient to cope with these inter-dimensional reality?

What else would you like to know?
Click to expand...

when you truly start to think
 
Dutch said:
for the thousands time: HDDesign is not about exact predictions, its about specific underlying themes that wil find expression at specific moments in our perception of time
Click to expand...
What part of specific underlying themes and specific moments would lead to your ridiculous not about exact predictions excuse?


of course, knowledge of our reality will enable us to subtelize it
Click to expand...
By which you apparently mean writing about it on the internet, no actual intervention or effort on your part.


I think its the biggest help you can imagine
Click to expand...
How is something non-specific happening in a vague region at an unknown level of intensity and with capricious temporal restrictions meant to be of any help at all?


like how?
Click to expand...
Like any sort of guidelines or procedures that would allow anyone to repeat your work; something to distinguish it from post-dictive cherry-picking.


Do you think you can determine the proper set of rules for such a test?
You are way to limited
Click to expand...
If you can't, you don't have any system to test.


yes, every addition on the timelines is mentioned in a seperate post ( or more) . again, no predictions
Click to expand...
That's not ground work or initial calculations, it's adding meaningless data to undefined data while declaring that the starting point is such because you worked backward from the stuff you just made up.


You want a limited answer to something that goes beyond our current scientific understanding?
Click to expand...
I would like any reasonable answer, preferably one that doesn't misuse scientific terms and then claim it is nothing to do with science.


Don't you see its insufficient to cope with these inter-dimensional reality?
Click to expand...
You cannot even demonstrate that you understand what that means.


when you truly start to think
Click to expand...
If you genuinely wished to help the world with HDD you would answer any reasonable questions, double check your data, provide robust statistical analyses, provide information on the rules of the system and educate yourself as much as possible in the fields you claim to involve.

You would not ignore questions and make poor attempts at insulting people.
 
Last edited:
Dutch said:
Earl, grow up

I have send you a pm after I was banned from BAUT in order to continue the discussion, it didn't matter to me where that would be. I offered you and some others to continue at hddesign forum or elsewhere, but you refused
Click to expand...

You did not respond to what Mister Earl actually said.
 
Dutch said:
Earl, grow up

I have send you a pm after I was banned from BAUT in order to continue the discussion, it didn't matter to me where that would be. I offered you and some others to continue at hddesign forum or elsewhere, but you refused
Click to expand...

Of course we did. You were given 60 days to bring something new to the table, and you could not. Why drag it out any longer? You wanted the opportunity to prove HDD was real. You were not able. That was years ago. You still have not.
 
Dutch said:
for the thousands time: HDDesign is not about exact predictions, its about specific underlying themes that wil find expression at specific moments in our perception of time
Click to expand...
All of which are you imagination until proven otherwise.

Dutch said:
of course, knowledge of our reality will enable us to subtelize it
Click to expand...
That's what science does. And your hypothesis fails at science.

Dutch said:
I think its the biggest help you can imagine
Click to expand...
Your perceptions and reality have been shown to be markedly different.

Dutch said:
Do you think you can determine the proper set of rules for such a test?
You are way to limited
Click to expand...
It's called the scientific method. Read up on it. Seriously, it couldn't hurt.

Dutch said:
yes, every addition on the timelines is mentioned in a seperate post ( or more) . again, no predictions
Click to expand...
Which means what to me or anyone else?

Dutch said:
You want a limited answer to something that goes beyond our current scientific understanding? Don't you see its insufficient to cope with these inter-dimensional reality?
Click to expand...
You have yet to prove HDD exists. You have yet to prove your idea of inter-dimensional structure exists. You have yet to prove anything about HDD.

Dutch said:
when you truly start to think
Click to expand...
I did think. I thought quite a bit about HDD. And I found it lacking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom