I am the first in the world

alfa1

Banned
A
Joined
Nov 22, 2010
Messages
327
I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?
I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.
 
I'm a high school drop out, and this looks like a math equation.

Mind breaking this down so I could understand it?
 
Short: You have 7 quantum states, the superposition of those states multiplied with the probability to be on each state give you the wave function...
 
alfa1 said:
I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?
I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.
Click to expand...

Are the 7 states |Φi > orthonormal? Are they complete? What Hilbert space do they span?

Are the amplitudes ci fixed, or are they constrained by the observation of observables?

Does the wave function |ψ> serve to completely specify the individual? If so, how can it be that a given human is constrained and characterized via the specification of a mere seven complex numbers?
 
My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points.
I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3>+ ... + c(n-1)|Φ(n-1)> + cn|Φn>
are n states |Φi > because are n acupuncture points or energy centers.
 
alfa1 said:
My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points.
I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3>+ ... + c(n-1)|Φ(n-1)> + cn|Φn>
are n states |Φi > because are n acupuncture points or energy centers.
Click to expand...

Does there exist an analog of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients that describes the relationship between the coefficients {c1,..., c7} of an eigenstate of the Chakra operator and the coefficients {c1, ..., cn} of an eigenstate of the Acupuncture operator?
 
Last edited:
Vorticity said:
Does there exist an analog of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients that describes the relationship between the coefficients {c1,..., c7} of an eigenstate of the Chakra operator and the coefficients {c1, ..., cn} of an eigenstate of the Acupuncture operator?
Click to expand...
I see what you did there.
 
madurobob Wow Funky math aside, a theory is useless !

Show me another theory Who am I? and I will delete my wave function!
 
alfa1 said:
madurobob Wow Funky math aside, a theory is useless !

Show me another theory Who am I? and I will delete my wave function!
Click to expand...

So, what you are saying is that you cannot explain your own theory in a way that provides any testable predictions or claims?

Imagine my surprise.
 
alfa1 said:
I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?
I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.
Click to expand...

I thought the primary equation was b4I4q ru/18 qt(pi)?
 
Are the chakras a complete basis? Are they stationary states? I'd hate to start the day as |Φ5> and gradually evolve into |Φ7>---or worse, |Φ8> (the tau neutrino) or |Φ9> (chi) or |Φ10> (strontium). Maybe the Power Balance Bracelet can help prevent that.
 
I worked 2 years to find a link between spirituality and science, for the wave function....
 
alfa1 said:
I worked 2 years to find a link between spirituality and science, for the wave function....
Click to expand...

It's not a "wave function" unless it's a solution to a wave equation. What's the wave equation?
 
Vorticity said:
Does there exist an analog of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients that describes the relationship between the coefficients {c1,..., c7} of an eigenstate of the Chakra operator and the coefficients {c1, ..., cn} of an eigenstate of the Acupuncture operator?
Click to expand...

You are WAY off. Would one test the polarity of a Bogin-time reversal module with bare hands and a volt-meter? Only if you wanted to disrupt the existing continuum belt! Eigenstates only correspond to the innate differential between the first member of any set. To properly deduce the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, one must first lay forth the principles postulated by the great quantum philosopher Zeron Druthers, in which he configured the locations of the Chi lines via sub-protian scanning. This is basic theoretical quantum. Try cracking a book sometime.
 
Last edited:
SumDood said:
You are WAY off. Would one test the polarity of a Bogin-time reversal module with bare hands and a volt-meter? Only if you wanted to disrupt the existing continuum belt! Eigenstates only correspond to the innate differential between the first member of any set. To properly deduce the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, one must first lay forth the principles postulated by the great quantum philosopher Zeron Druthers, in which he configured the locations of the Chi lines via sub-protian scanning. This is basic theoretical quantum. Try cracking a book sometime.
Click to expand...

Well, I was going to mention that, but now I don't have to. Thanks. As old Zeron was fond of saying, "you can state your wave, but you can't wave your state"
 
"tell us who you are and collapse your wave function"

giggle :)

I'm an organic chemist (10+ years post PhD)...sorry, I found that comment incredibly amusing!
 
I used to know what an eigenvalue was, but alas I fear that those neurons were destroyed shortly after graduation.

Why is "Who am I?" the most important question? I always thought the most important question was "Any more beer?"
 
Spindrift said:
I used to know what an eigenvalue was, but alas I fear that those neurons were destroyed shortly after graduation.

Why is "Who am I?" the most important question? I always thought the most important question was "Any more beer?"
Click to expand...

But if you keep asking the "Any more beer?" question you will eventually arrive at the "who am I?" question, also the "where are my pants?" question and most importantly, the "who peed on the floor?" question.
 
f(me) = sum (beer consumed) + sum (books read) + sum (assets-liabilities) - weight (ejaculate wasted on the ground)
 
alfa1 said:
madurobob Wow Funky math aside, a theory is useless !

Show me another theory Who am I? and I will delete my wave function!
Click to expand...

René Descartes beat you to it, did it simpler and was more accurate.
 
AdMan said:
Duplicate post.
Click to expand...
Not surprising. He's been spamming this nonsense, and his self proclaimed superiority to Einstein, Newton, Maxwell, Schrödinger and Planck around the 'net for the last couple of months. Even Usenet.:D
What is it about electronic engineers that causes them to think they understand quantum mechanics better than physicists........:confused:
 
alfa1 said:
I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure "The Tao of Physics" and "The Dancing Wu-Li Masters" has written of links between the two before. Their stuff seemed more comprehensible than this wave chancre.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom