Originally Posted by mrkinnies
They dont agree about column 79 but they think WTC7 was a progressive collapse
that occured because
of thermal expansion because
of the fires, they praise the NIST report and denounce AE911 and 911 conspiracies as "preposterous". On the other side, AE911claim that explosives and thermite were used, that thermal expansion is nonsence, that progressive collpase would be impossible.
Here's some more quotes from David Scott, Chairman of CTBUH:
And yet you claim David Scott to be "intelligent, sane and certainly not 'in on it'"
So I ask you again, how can he be competent engineer if he believes in everything you claim shows the NIST report to be frauds? He is either dangerously incompetent or he is insane or he is in on the coverup.
This is the reason REAL engineers debate the NIST report, from David Scott again:
Quotes from his post here: