Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
By the time he is finished, Eric Hunt will destroy the phony holohoax.

Anyone who watches his movie 'The Last Days of the Big Lie' will know that the holohoax is a collection of degenerate lies.
 
Based on his blog and the newspaper article, I'd say it'll be a few years before he can get on with it. Prison time will do that to you.

Of course, he'll be able to "bond" with the boys in the Ayran Brotherhood while in, so maybe he won't see it as a total loss.
 
Based on his blog and the newspaper article, I'd say it'll be a few years before he can get on with it. Prison time will do that to you.

Of course, he'll be able to "bond" with the boys in the Ayran Brotherhood while in, so maybe he won't see it as a total loss.

You're out of the loop, BR. He copped some sort of plea and got minimal time. He has web site, just google Eric Hunt
 
You're out of the loop, BR. He copped some sort of plea and got minimal time. He has web site, just google Eric Hunt

The "plea" he copped was lying to the jury when he said he was no longer a holocaust denier. He admitted to having mental issues and initially attempted to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.

A brave Aryan Warrior, right Saggs?
 
Note the name of the prosecutor in Hunt's case: Alan Kennedy.

Anyone besides Lemmy and Nick able to tell me why that's kinda funny?
 
The "plea" he copped was lying to the jury when he said he was no longer a holocaust denier. He admitted to having mental issues and initially attempted to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.

A brave Aryan Warrior, right Saggs?

He did what was necessary to escape from the degenerates who wanted him in prison.

A hero in my book. He confronted Wiesel, a masterstroke !
 
He did what was necessary to escape from the degenerates who wanted him in prison.

A hero in my book. He confronted Wiesel, a masterstroke !

Which part makes him a hero in your book? Lying in court or beating up on an old man?
 
Anyone who watches his movie 'The Last Days of the Big Lie' will know that the holohoax is a collection of degenerate lies.
.
There is no such movie. There are a series of lame YouTube clips by that name.

And I wonder why hunt doesn't take the Challenge to Supporters of the Revisionist Transit Camp Theory -- or for that matter, why *you* don't?

Or are you once again referring to degenerate lies such as "the gas chamber at Dachau was actually a shower, and I have pics to prove it" or "there was a childrens' zoo at Treblinka"?

Remind me again -- who posted those lies?
.
 
.
You know, it occurs to me that saggs was strangely silent back while Rhymes With was reported to have been in the pokey...
.
 
Nah. Saggy ain't RW. RW posts under his own name at CODOH; Saggy posts there as SevenUp.
 
Hunt should have poured fake blood on Wiesel, symbolic of blood of the literally hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, that have died in the middle east because of the lies of Wiesel and others like him.

We can only hope the death and devastation resulting from the holohoax lies remains contained in the middle east.
 
Hunt should have poured fake blood on Wiesel, symbolic of blood of the literally hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, that have died in the middle east because of the lies of Wiesel and others like him.

We can only hope the death and devastation resulting from the holohoax lies remains contained in the middle east.

The neocons get their credibility and carte blanche from the Holohoax. Everyone else is fair game.
 
Hunt should have poured fake blood on Wiesel, symbolic of blood of the literally hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, that have died in the middle east because of the lies of Wiesel and others like him.

We can only hope the death and devastation resulting from the holohoax lies remains contained in the middle east.

The death and devastation from the holocaust ended when the Nazis lost the war.

Now, what was it about Eric Hunt's actions that made him a hero in your book? Lying in court or beating up on an old man?
 
The neocons get their credibility and carte blanche from the Holohoax. Everyone else is fair game.

What exactly makes you guys think that — if what had been done to the Jews during World War II was everything that history tells us had been done except for killing them — things would have turned out differently in the Middle East?

Clue: The U.K. first suggested partition of Palestine in 1937.
 
What exactly makes you guys think that — if what had been done to the Jews during World War II was everything that history tells us had been done except for killing them — things would have turned out differently in the Middle East?

Clue: The U.K. first suggested partition of Palestine in 1937.

Maybe we would have stopped aid to Israel after they slaughtered my fellow servicemen of the USS Liberty.
 
Maybe we would have stopped aid to Israel after they slaughtered my fellow servicemen of the USS Liberty.

But you didn't. Is this why you deny the holocaust? Perhaps you need to take some lessons in causality. Or maybe some therapy.
 
Maybe we would have stopped aid to Israel after they slaughtered my fellow servicemen of the USS Liberty.

Two points here:

(1) Any veteran who would be afraid to meet me for lunch is a good explanation for why we lost in Vietnam.

(2) We BEGAN our aid to Israel after the Liberty incident —*specifically after the '73 war. Learn some history.
 
Two points here:

(1) Any veteran who would be afraid to meet me for lunch is a good explanation for why we lost in Vietnam.

(2) We BEGAN our aid to Israel after the Liberty incident —*specifically after the '73 war. Learn some history.

http://wrmea.org/component/content/...rect-us-aid-to-israel-almost-114-billion.html


Hey, I don't trust you. Simple as that. You support lies and liars.



If I remember correctly the Zionist controlled msm of the time were pretty much dogs and sailers keep off the grass against the war.

That's why we left. Only backstabbing scum say we lost.
 
Hey, I don't trust you. Simple as that. You support lies and liars.

You shouldn't project. It makes you look stupid.


If I remember correctly the Zionist controlled msm of the time were pretty much dogs and sailers keep off the grass against the war.

Where did that evidence go that you presented for the media being Zionist controlled?

Oh wait, you didn't present any, did you?

That's why we left. Only backstabbing scum say we lost.

You lost. I'm not American. Am I backtabbing scum?

Kind of reminds me of the Nazis who tried to blame the Jews for stabbing Germany in the back during WWI, saying Germany would have won if it weren't for dem meddling Joos.
 
Note the name of the prosecutor in Hunt's case: Alan Kennedy. Anyone besides Lemmy and Nick able to tell me why that's kinda funny?

I played around on the Internet and thought about this but I can't work this out. I know it's not important, but I have to ask. What is the cryptic connection?
 
Michael Hoffman on Yom Kippur ...

THE HORSE MANURE:

"Yom Kippur, which begins next Friday night and ends Saturday night, is the Jewish Day of Atonement, the culmination of 10 days of contemplation, self-renewal and rededication to the path of righteousness.”

-Mark Oppenheimer, New York Times, Sept. 30.

THE TRUTH:

Yom Kippur is a despicable liars' festival wherein promises and oaths to be made in the coming year are nullified in advance, during the 'Kol Nidrei' rite. Is it the “path of righteousness” to cut a deal with God to be absolved for future perjury and contracts one intends to break in the coming year? Yom Kippur’s Kol Nidrei is decidedly unrighteous. So why the coverup? The journalistic mission of the New York Times is to shield Judaism from exposure, not to report the ugly truth about it. The yiddishkeit at the Times is too strong to allow the staff to report on Judaism the way the Times harshly scrutinizes Roman Catholicism and Islam. This is the halacha of the Kitzur Shulchan Aruch and Mishnah Berurah, as implemented by the New York Times: one standard for exalted Zionists and another for the debased goyim.

Is this why the Zionists on this board can't give a straight answer, to the request for the name on ONE credible Jewish eyewitness to the holohoax?
 
Last edited:
http://wrmea.org/component/content/...rect-us-aid-to-israel-almost-114-billion.html

Hey, I don't trust you. Simple as that. You support lies and liars.

I'm going to do math. I apologize if it hurts your head.

The link you gave indicates a total of $68 billion for the first 47 years of Israel's existence. For 1996 through 1999, the amount given averaged around $3.1 billion per year. Divide that total aid for that period ($68 billion) by the average aid for 1996 through 1999, and you get around 22 years, and if you count back from 1996, it brings you to 1974, which would be the first year that Israel received anything but minimal aid.

Q.e.d.

If I remember correctly the Zionist controlled msm of the time were pretty much dogs and sailers keep off the grass against the war.

That's why we left. Only backstabbing scum say we lost.

Really?

fall_of_saigon-500x327.jpg


That looks a hell of a lot like losing to me...
 
Is this why the Zionists on this board can't give a straight answer, to the request for the name on ONE credible Jewish eyewitness to the holohoax?


Is this why Saggy can't give a straight answer to the request for the name of ONE credible eyewitness to this conspiracy of Jews which control all media everywhere?
 
That looks a hell of a lot like losing to me...
Even more so when you consider Vietnam "thrashed" the PLA when they invaded Vietnam in 1979.

Vietnam won wars. It was their country being invaded and they put up a fight. Good luck to them.
 
Why doesn't everybody who wants to discuss the Jews and their control of whatever it is they control find another thread to do that? Surely there must be room for that kind of discussion under the Conspiracy Theory subforum. Jewish domination is the mother of all conspiracy theories. Go bash Jews over there. This is about the holocaust. It has nothing to do with the Jews.
 
Why doesn't everybody who wants to discuss the Jews and their control of whatever it is they control find another thread to do that?


Saggy was the one who broached that subject, as a way of explaining why the "holohoax", to use his word, was so prevalent. As a result, I think it completely appropriate to keep pointing out that Saggy has utterly failed to support the angle that he himself brought up. He continually bleats about how there is no evidence for the Holocaust while ignoring there is no evidence for one of his justifications as to why the so-called "holohoax" continues on.

Me continually reminding readers of that glaring contradiction is, I think, entirely justified. It goes to Saggy's credibility, his (in)ability to support his points, and his analytical capacity (or lack of same).

Feel free to appeal to the moderators if you wish. I'll abide by their judgement on the matter.
 
I'm going to do math. I apologize if it hurts your head.

The link you gave indicates a total of $68 billion for the first 47 years of Israel's existence. For 1996 through 1999, the amount given averaged around $3.1 billion per year. Divide that total aid for that period ($68 billion) by the average aid for 1996 through 1999, and you get around 22 years, and if you count back from 1996, it brings you to 1974, which would be the first year that Israel received anything but minimal aid.

Q.e.d.



Really?

[qimg]http://www.salem-news.com/stimg/april062010/fall_of_saigon-500x327.jpg[/qimg]

That looks a hell of a lot like losing to me...

Is that the line of nekid women to an imaginary gas chamber?
 
Why doesn't everybody who wants to discuss the Jews and their control of whatever it is they control find another thread to do that? Surely there must be room for that kind of discussion under the Conspiracy Theory subforum. Jewish domination is the mother of all conspiracy theories. Go bash Jews over there. This is about the holocaust. It has nothing to do with the Jews.

Say what? The holohoax could not exist if the Jews didn't control everything. The absurd notion that the Nazis gassed 10,000 per day at Auschwitz is completely absurd, not a shred of physical evidence to support, and there is overwhelming physical evidence of an obvious hoax, and yet, the holohoax exists. How in hell can that be? Where is the media, where is academia, where is an ounce of common sense? Answer: controlled by the Jews, it has to be that way.

The thing about the holohoax is that it is the obvious, easy to see, tear in the fantasy constructed by the media, educational system, political system, etc. The thing is preposterous, and yet, it controls our fates directly to the point of millions dead in the middle east, the US fighting 3/4/5 wars, and constant threats of more US/Israeli attacks.

I think the holohoax is the key to everything, but it's only a small part of the fantasy world that we live in.
 
Say what? The holohoax could not exist if the Jews didn't control everything.

Which they don't, as you have been consistently unable to disprove, which means - according to you - that there is no holohoax. Just a holocaust.

Self-debunking is so much fun.


The absurd notion that the Nazis gassed 10,000 per day at Auschwitz is completely absurd, not a shred of physical evidence to support,

Lie number 1.

and there is overwhelming physical evidence of an obvious hoax,

Lie number 2.

and yet, the holohoax exists.

Aaaand... lie number 3. All in one sentence. By the way, you just proved the hoax didn't exist. Try to stay consistent.

How in hell can that be? Where is the media, where is academia, where is an ounce of common sense?

It's all there. The media has in this case reported actual history as opposed to your make believe history. Academia thinks you're nuts, and common sense you ain't got.

Answer: controlled by the Jews, it has to be that way.

But it's not, so that leaves you... were exactly? Oh that's right. Half way to Bedlam.

The thing about the holohoax is that it is the obvious, easy to see, tear in the fantasy constructed by the media, educational system, political system, etc.

Insane people see all kinds of things that aren't there. This is one such thing.

The thing is preposterous, and yet, it controls our fates directly to the point of millions dead in the middle east, the US fighting 3/4/5 wars, and constant threats of more US/Israeli attacks.

Arguments from incredulity don't impress anyone. Especially when you have been proven to be wrong literally hundreds of times in just this one thread.

I think the holohoax is the key to everything, but it's only a small part of the fantasy world that we live in.

The fantasy world you live in, Saggs. The rest of us are able to grasp reality.
 
Last edited:
There is zero evidence of a hoax. No paper trial. No whistleblowers. No document-creating services. Zippo.
 
There is zero evidence of a hoax. No paper trial. No whistleblowers. No document-creating services. Zippo.

There is nothing but evidence of the hoax.

The phony hoax stories published in the New York Times in 1906, 1919, etc.

The phony gas chambers at Auschwitz and Majdanek.

The pictures of Belsen victims published as victims of the hoax.

The phony 'confessions' of Hoess and Paul Blobel.

The Academy Award for Irene Zisblatt's absurd lies.

Yad Vashem's absurd pictures of hoax victims ....

The USHMM's picture of the door to the Dachau hoax gas chamber ...

The suppression of the photos of the healthy children at Dachau and Auschwitz.

The suppression of the pictures of thousands of healthy Dachau prisoners at the end of the war.

The laws against 'holohoax denial'.

The statements of degenerate academics like Noam Chomsky that one "loses one's humanity" to discuss the holohoax historically.

The Hasbara documents for combatting holohoax denial.

Etc., etc., etc ....
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom