Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
en de betekenis in dit geval, in context graag?
staat niet in het woordenboek, nu moet je zelf nadenken.
Hyper Dimensional Design
- Thread starter Dutch
- Start date
- Status
en de betekenis in dit geval, in context graag?
staat niet in het woordenboek, nu moet je zelf nadenken.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Indeed.
Google translation:
The context was already provided in Paul's post to which Dutch originally responded.
As has been demonstrated many times, Dutch will refer to non existent data, or he will pretend that existing data doesn't exist.
Dutch's dishonesty is staggering.
I think everyone would be amazed if you did.
The problem with facts, for you, is that disagreeing with them doesn't change their nature.
That's because you're also lying to yourself.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
Daylightstar
Philosopher
I'll give you a clue, the initials are HDD.
OK, since you have an aversion to scrolling up...
Since you need things spelled out again and again:
You make predictions. (But you lie and say you don't make predictions.)
Something else happens. (But you lie to yourself and think you changed events.)
The predictions fail. You lie to us and say you didn't predict anything and that the prediction didn't fail.
It could not be more obvious!!!
You lie, lie, and lie again.
Stop lying to yourself, Dutch, and you will see the facts.
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Not "a" lie, many lies and dishonesties.
Let me show you a couple, besides the one Orphia Nay demonstrated:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7429827&postcount=4496
(lying about mutual understanding)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7405784&postcount=4405
(lying about not knowing about your demonstrated dishonesty)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7401411&postcount=4370
(lying about: links which clearly demonstrate your dishonesty, supposedly being out of context)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7401338&postcount=4362
(lying that you can't be nailed on dishonesty, after this dishonest lie had been elaborately demonstrated)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7401212&postcount=4338
(an installment of the 'it's over there trick')
You are a liar. plain and simple.
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
explain the lie in your own words or keep silent
OMG!
Yesterday, while at work, I had to think about the reentry of Phobos Grunt, probably around January 16, 2012, in relation to Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1.
I thought that the specific Pi- based Design as described in HDDesign ( and HDDesign only ), which was first unveiled by the continued mission of spacecraft Deep Impact/Epoxi with the scheduled and actual comet encounters and the Deep Impact/Epoxi-Earth-Moon Transit expressing Pi as described, could give indications of hidden underlying Intelligent Design.
I determined the 2 Pi points as described in HDdesign between Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1 on July 4, 2005, and the expected reentry of Phobos Grunt around January 16, 2012.
The first Pi point is around Venus Transit Midpoint around June 8, 2008, just after the 'artificial' Earth-Moon-spacecraft Deep Impact/Epoxi Transit, the event that led to the discovery of the specific Pi- based element of HDDesign, see timeline Q2 2008 here:
timeline Q2, 2008 April - May - June
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=299&mforum=hddesign
The second Pi point is around February 10, 2009. On that day a Russian and an American satellite collided over Siberia, creating a large amount of space debris.
That was yesterday
The 'confirmation' came today, ISS has to change course in order to avoid collision with this very same space debris caused by this satellite collission at Pi point
read on at HDDesign forum:
Q1 2012 timeline
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=566&mforum=hddesign
you can login with 'reader' password 'reader'
OMG!
Yesterday, while at work, I had to think about the reentry of Phobos Grunt, probably around January 16, 2012, in relation to Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1.
I thought that the specific Pi- based Design as described in HDDesign ( and HDDesign only ), which was first unveiled by the continued mission of spacecraft Deep Impact/Epoxi with the scheduled and actual comet encounters and the Deep Impact/Epoxi-Earth-Moon Transit expressing Pi as described, could give indications of hidden underlying Intelligent Design.
I determined the 2 Pi points as described in HDdesign between Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1 on July 4, 2005, and the expected reentry of Phobos Grunt around January 16, 2012.
The first Pi point is around Venus Transit Midpoint around June 8, 2008, just after the 'artificial' Earth-Moon-spacecraft Deep Impact/Epoxi Transit, the event that led to the discovery of the specific Pi- based element of HDDesign, see timeline Q2 2008 here:
timeline Q2, 2008 April - May - June
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=299&mforum=hddesign
The second Pi point is around February 10, 2009. On that day a Russian and an American satellite collided over Siberia, creating a large amount of space debris.
That was yesterday
The 'confirmation' came today, ISS has to change course in order to avoid collision with this very same space debris caused by this satellite collission at Pi point
read on at HDDesign forum:
Q1 2012 timeline
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=566&mforum=hddesign
you can login with 'reader' password 'reader'
You're in denial, Dutch. The facts were in my own words, with supporting evidence. Give your scrutinizers the proper attention they deserve, instead of scrolling past them like you do news articles that don't support your prophecies when you're googling to get your next HDD post fix.
dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
So what? Tell me why this is important and tell me what is going to happen.
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
as above - so below
Colliding artificial manmade satellites
and colliding asteroids in space.....during the same timeframe
from the timeline Q1 2009, also with a another splendid 'artificial' Earth-Moon-manmade spacecraft 'transit'( how many 'coincidences' do you need to open up the 'rigid' mind?) :
read on at HDDesign forum
Colliding artificial manmade satellites
and colliding asteroids in space.....during the same timeframe
from the timeline Q1 2009, also with a another splendid 'artificial' Earth-Moon-manmade spacecraft 'transit'( how many 'coincidences' do you need to open up the 'rigid' mind?) :
read on at HDDesign forum
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
I think it's just a bridge too far for you. You just refuse to try to really follow the HDDesign findings and how they fall in their place by 'coincidence' based on HDDesign
dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
So what? Satellites collide? There are over 13000 of them up there. There are a lot of asteroids too, the ISO Deep Asteroid Search indicates that there are between 1.1 million and 1.9 million 'space rocks' larger than 1 kilometre in diameter in the so-called 'main asteroid belt. You have the rigid mind. I still have no idea what this fatuous HDD is supposed to do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfSaztUiw5s
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
No Dutch, your lies must be presented in your own words.
Like above:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7914518&postcount=4633
Last edited:
- Status