Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
I'm sorry, but it's not about you man, it's about men
Hyper Dimensional Design
- Thread starter Dutch
- Start date
- Status
I'm sorry, but it's not about you man, it's about men
Not interesting, but typical, that you've spent more time trying to play the victim in just that one post than you have genuinely answering questions or explaining your method in all your other posts combined.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Who is this "man"? I know of no poster on this thread with the user name "man". Once again you quote a post of mine and reference some other user name, please try harder Dutch.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Is this what interests you Dutch, how many words people “spend” on you? Still you evidently have no interest in critically examining your own notions yourself? Unfortunate, though I will still expend some more words upon you. It is your responsibility to debunk your own notions, abdicating that responsibility it then falls to others to try to demonstrate to you the bunk in your notions. No one can debunk them for you, you have to do that yourself and not only have you failed in that regard, you haven’t even tried.
A question you should well ask yourself.
Those “given elements of HDDesign” being your “intuitive thoughts and synchronicities” confirming your “intuitive thoughts and synchronicities”. Self confirmation, ain’t that efficient.
“It's a kind of sharing essential material”? So its not exactly like “sharing essential material”, I didn’t think you realized that. Just to whom, other than you, do you think this “material” is “essential” to and why?
Daylightstar
Philosopher
You're not a victim but a prisoner.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Is it me or was Dutch's writing slightly more garbled than usual?
You've given us the criteria for rounding?
(Just one of my queries with Dutch's answer.)
Last edited:
I have no idea what he was saying to me.
Math isn't essential? Working with numbers, you need math. Unless, ocourse, you are just making crap up.
So now you are down to intuition and self described synchronicities? Sad.
I accepted a direct challenge from the very guy that started the thread. Totally on topic, no need for a new thread. How come Plastic Dimensional Design has accurate predictions and HDD has only vague, mostly nonsensical post-dictions?
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Maybe he'll have sobered up next time.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Bolding by Daylightstar
It = "Tell them how you do this. Tell them the criteria for running the numbers. Give them the equations. Give them the criteria for rounding. Tell them precisely how the numerological results point directly at a specific incident."
It ≠ "I do that with every post in the material" and the other garbage no one asked for.
Sideroxylon
Featherless biped
He has admited many times there is no system that he can explain. This crap should not be in the science forums. The "intuitive" element of HDD means Dutch is plucking things out of his date.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Yes, I know. I thought I'll just point out the dishonest way in which he replied to DarbyII.
He has also confirmed that what he does is a psychic exercise, it indeed has nothing to do with science.
The proposed dates are wrong because the math is wrong.
The equation is supposed to be: Date +/- 1 day = (90 degrees - 19.47 degrees) * orbital degrees transited per day
Thus the equation, using his numbers should be:
Date +/- 1 = (90-19.47) * (360/365) = 69.56
In his equation he used days per degree (365/360) instead of degrees per day (360/365) and in his example came up with 71.5 days instead of 69.56 days. He got the wrong result in every case. He arrived at the point along the orbital path two days earlier than his calculation shows. Plus or, especially minus, and he's off by up to three days.
Not to mention he's using geometry and geometers use radians, not degrees unless there's a good and stated reason for doing so. Mid-schoolers learning basic Plane Geometry I (2D geometry, not N-dimension hyperspace geometry requiring a keen understanding of differential geometry - a form of math that Einstein had to go back to school to learn before completing his thesis on General Relativity) start out using degrees. Why radians instead of degrees? It's simple. Radians is a dimensionless number - a simple ratio. Oh...and it's another "magic" irrational number in its own right that is found everywhere in nature, just like Phi and Pi.
Last edited:
As an aside, speaking of these magic ratios found in plane geometry...
If you've had five or six hours on MS Flight Simulator and are thinking that you want to give it a whack IRL and fly from, say Detroit to Milan please do not take Plane Geometry I along as your co-pilot and navigator. Surprise! The sum of the interior angles of a triangle is not 180 degrees. Certain magic ratios that hold true in the local (and relatively tiny and locally flat) frame do not hold true on a globe. We do not want to land somewhere in the Atlantic Pond when Milano is our target.
If you've had five or six hours on MS Flight Simulator and are thinking that you want to give it a whack IRL and fly from, say Detroit to Milan please do not take Plane Geometry I along as your co-pilot and navigator. Surprise! The sum of the interior angles of a triangle is not 180 degrees. Certain magic ratios that hold true in the local (and relatively tiny and locally flat) frame do not hold true on a globe. We do not want to land somewhere in the Atlantic Pond when Milano is our target.
Last edited:
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
There's no pm and the thread is gone, what's going on?
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
You are not The Man
- Status