Let's observe the following analogy:
[qimg]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7043/6840987626_c9c426828a_z.jpg[/qimg]
NOthing is weaker than any tool that is used to measure it.
YESthing is stronger than any tool that is used to measure it.
Unity (thing) is the source of NO,SOME,EVERY,YES ploychotomy.
Let's observe the following analogy:
[qimg]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7043/6840987626_c9c426828a_z.jpg[/qimg]
NOthing is weaker than any tool that is used to measure it.
YESthing is stronger than any tool that is used to measure it.
Unity (thing) is the source of NO,SOME,EVERY,YES ploychotomy.
Now you are restricted to an analogy.Now you have a shaving mirror, perhaps you can learn to use Occam's razor.
Past ==> Future Time is the serial awareness of the inability of lower spaces or sub-spaces (where sub-spaces are mixture of lower spaces and higher space) to completely cover a given higher space.
Present Time is the parallel awareness of the inability of polytchotomy to be Unity.
Time and space, whether it is serial or parallel, are restricted to polytchotomy, where Unity (thing) is the source beyond restriction.
dafydd's awareness can't comprehendGibberish. Not even wrong.
dafydd's awareness can't comprehend
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8115426&postcount=842
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8118378&postcount=844
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8118497&postcount=847
not even at the level of the analogy.
So his\her reply has no impact on the considered subject beyond [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/234094f620a22c9935.gif[/qimg] .
You are not in any position to claim such an argument exactly because you get these links as gibberish (you get Mathematics only under the restrictions of Polychotomy).I am aware that you know nothing about mathematics.
The power of the continuum is the signature of YESthing in the universe of spaces.
Discreetness is the signature of NOthing in the universe of spaces.
As a result no amount of lower spaces or sub-spaces (where sub-spaces are mixture of lower spaces and higher space) completely cover a given higher space.
The current mathematical and scientific awareness is closed under the collection of lower\higher spaces.
Only what YOU know about awareness matters, and according to your replies, YOU are actually doing nothing in order to know it.dafydd said:You know bugger all about my awareness.
No one here is a puppet in your show.
Anyone on this thread ever encounter "The Laws of Form" by G. Spencer-Brown? Some of what doronshadmi's rambling on about seems similar to GSB's later ramblings. Unlike this clown, though, the primary arithmetic of LoF (which is really just a different notation for regular Boolean algebra), and some derivative formal systems, actually led to some interesting mathematics.
Anyone on this thread ever encounter "The Laws of Form" by G. Spencer-Brown? Some of what doronshadmi's rambling on about seems similar to GSB's later ramblings. Unlike this clown, though, the primary arithmetic of LoF (which is really just a different notation for regular Boolean algebra), and some derivative formal systems, actually led to some interesting mathematics.
I am waiting for content, but we are currently stuck t form....
No awareness can get actual content only at the level of thoughts, which is naturally changeable, subjective and closed under polychotomy.I am waiting for content, but we are currently stuck t form....
No awareness can get actual content only at the level of thoughts, which is naturally changeable, subjective and closed under polychotomy.
In order to get actual content (Unity awareness), awareness has to be also aware of its calm non-personal objective aspect.
Only by directly aware of YESthing\NOthing as the infinite signatures of "host"(continuum\objective\non-personal)\"hosted"(discreetness\subjective\personal) (abstract or physical) spaces, awareness can be aware of itself as Unity and as the source of polychotomy (whether it is serial and\or parallel).
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8115426&postcount=842 analogy can help to do the actual practice in order to achieve Unity awareness, and your awareness, realpaladin, is naturally waiting for content, which can't be achieved, as long as your awareness is trapped only at the level of thoughts ("hosted"(discreetness\subjective\personal) (abstract or physical) spaces).
How do you know that? ( B.t.w you have missed http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8106064&postcount=839 )"he has made an utterance which has no literal significance even for himself."
Still floating upon the subjective level of thoughts?Bedknobs & broomsticks again?
"he has made an utterance which has no literal significance even for himself."
Who has?
Still floating upon the subjective level of thoughts?
The pathetic situation holds as long as one's mind is limited to the meaning of a given thought ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0rbfSaRwCU&blend=21&lr=1&ob=5 ).That's pathetic... even a jib or jive doesn't mean anything...
How do you know that? ( B.t.w you have missed http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8106064&postcount=839 )
Who has?
The person who makes a statement that is neither a tautology nor contains a proposition which may, at least in principle, be verified by experience.
How do you know that I have made an utterance which has no literal significance even for myself?How do I know what?
Why?I just had nothing further to say on it.
How do you know that I have made an utterance which has no literal significance even for myself?
Why?
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/ayer01.htm should clarify.
You can read it here: http://www.archive.org/details/AlfredAyer
Erm... this is the work that Keyfeatures promoted by using that quote...Thank you I will peruse this lofty work at my leisure. Although I doubt it will introduce me to anything I have not already considered.
Erm... this is the work that Keyfeatures promoted by using that quote...
I have no stake in it, so you can scream like a primate in her direction if you feel that urge...
I don't know, but I surmise that it is the same as what she wrote to Doron.And what is her stake in it?
Thank you I will peruse this lofty work at my leisure. Although I doubt it will introduce me to anything I have not already considered.
Ahhh, I love the rarified air in this thread, it takes me right back to the Himalaya. When I shivered all night on the summit of a mountain without a sleeping bag. The intensity of the shivering combined with the anguish of my predicament was an eternity. Every second was like a minute, every minute an hour.
Every second of suffering was worth it when the sun rose over the horizon and in the clarity peaks 150 miles away seemed close enough to reach out and touch. While bathing in the golden warmth of that sunrise I uttered a primal scream, the gut wrenching intensity of which no one would have heard.
And what is her stake in it?