Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
. . . I do not want ready a whole book about the subject. . . .
This desire pretty much insures that you will remain ignorant about the subject of the Holocaust. Your reduction of the various forms of evidence - which exist in enormous volume - to film and now forensics can only be because you "do not want ready a whole book," which would describe and analyze the very evidence you claim you want.

This kind of approach might be called "circular illogic." You won't get anywhere with it. But you will preserve your ability to reject what you haven't read and studied. Is that what you are after?
 
I have been doing military research about World War II and I really know how much the Germans registered and planned everything. They were extremely organized, so there must be a kind of direct evidence which shows how the whole plan of mass extermination, the so called "final solution", was designed.
When asked about Himmler, the response was:
No, who he was?

Where I can hear the voice recording?

When and where that was recorded?

It is in English?

"military research", right.
 
Does anyone here know who Hitler is? I've been researching German history and wondered, since I saw a YouTube showing all of German history and they showed this Hitler guy speechifying.
 
Does anyone here know who Hitler is? I've been researching German history and wondered, since I saw a YouTube showing all of German history and they showed this Hitler guy speechifying.

If he didn't speak English and we don't have a video of it it didn't happen.:):(:mad:
 
What part of "And don't try to move the goalpost now" didn't you understand? Your post was:

So you wanted:
a) a video with
b) people in it being killed in
c) a gas chamber
d) by germans


It's in my last post, I'm done. What you just did is raise the bar, now suddenly I have to prove to you too, that the video is not staged. This is a sceptics board, we all know the moving the goalpost fallacy.

No, you do not have to prove anything. You just did not provided a footage of a gas chamber being used to kill people.

This video was of course taken by the germans. It was found by the allies. But hey, since you are the one, who now claims that this one is staged: PROVE IT! Who staged it, who are the actors in the video, when was it staged, and so on and on, you have absolutly nothing.

I did not claimed anything. You are doing imaginary assumptions.

Hmm that's odd. When I read the rest of my last post, I can see it adressing your post well, I even mentioned the logical fallacies in it, you commited. So again, how stupid do you think I'm? Everyone knows this standard answer for a post, that just kicked your racist nutty ideas in the balls. So did you do the math on the graves? Do you have evidence for Treblinka just being a transit camp?

No, you don't have anything. Everytime one asks you holocaust deniers for positive evidence you just put your finger in the ears, dance around and sing lalala.

I think you are stupid as much as you create assumptions about a person you do not really know.

Yeah, as you can see, you are not the only wasting his time. I did get a warning for my last post for the breach of the rule "Attack the argument, not the arguer", which is kind of ironic, but never mind, I better just shut up, before I get banned. :)

Oh... Ironic.

You do realise, that even the video was recorded inside the museum, the film that is shown is still real?

Yes, I do.

Not just a room, a room, that was about to being filled with the fumes of two cars. THIS is called gassing, it's exactly what you wanted.

So, where is a footage of a real homicidal gas chamber? I do not want one which you think is "about to being filled with the fumes of two cars". I want one showing the whole operation of a homicidal gas chamber.
 
Yanking of chains or Stundie level post? "No, who he was?" "It is in English?"

What a bizarre discussion.

:confused:

This desire pretty much insures that you will remain ignorant about the subject of the Holocaust. Your reduction of the various forms of evidence - which exist in enormous volume - to film and now forensics can only be because you "do not want ready a whole book," which would describe and analyze the very evidence you claim you want.

What great work of assumptions you do.

This kind of approach might be called "circular illogic." You won't get anywhere with it. But you will preserve your ability to reject what you haven't read and studied. Is that what you are after?

Circular logic? It is something like you and others are doing? Diverting the subject from my initial question to focus the debate over my person and not over the issue under discussion?

You did not provided one single piece of evidence... But I am still waiting.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone here know who Hitler is? I've been researching German history and wondered, since I saw a YouTube showing all of German history and they showed this Hitler guy speechifying.

When asked about Himmler, the response was:


"military research", right.

If he didn't speak English and we don't have a video of it it didn't happen.:):(:mad:

So, after all that assumptions, none of you provided one single piece of evidence.

You are a complete failure.
 
There are many places to begin in understanding the Holocaust.Unfortunately their is no film of victims being gassed this due to the fact that the operations conducted at e.g the Rheinhard death camps like Treblinka were conducted under the highest of state secrecy for obvious reasons.Film and photography was strictly for hidden but some were taken by SS offers were taken as in the case of Treblinka. But we do have volumes of eyewitness testimony both surviving inmates and SS officers themselves.I've already referred to Franz Stangl Commodant of Treblinka and his assistant Franz Kurgen .Survivors testimony include the excellent Surving Treblinka by Samuel Willenberg.
Another angle of approach is the Regius Professor of Modern History Cambrige Richard Evans who has written extensively about The Third Reich including the reality of The Holocaust.He was notable as a Defence witness in David Irving's libel action against Deborah Lipstadt for suggesting he was a falsifier of History,a holocaust denier.It was the onus on her to prove thus and she won and Prof Evans apperared for the Defence.Do read his book about the the Trial, Lying about Hitler.Neeedless to say The Defence won and demonstrated that Irving was just that ,a falsifier of History and the Holocaust.
So you can say there is no easy You Tube path showing the gas chambers up and running and inmates being herded in.But there are masses of eyewitness both SS andVictims.I'll have to sat though there is Aerial Reccinisance photos of Auschwitze of Victims queing outsde a gas chamber.
More about Richard Evans here,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_J._Evans

There are numerous others like Laurence Rees,Christophes Browning.Ian Kershaw,Alan Bullock all of whom BTW are Gentiles.
 
So, where is a footage of a real homicidal gas chamber? I do not want one which you think is "about to being filled with the fumes of two cars". I want one showing the whole operation of a homicidal gas chamber.

Why do you assume that such a thing would exists in the first place?
 
So, after all that assumptions, none of you provided one single piece of evidence.

You are a complete failure.
Wrong.

ANTPogo provided these: http://hdot.org/en/trial/defense/browning and http://hdot.org/en/trial/defense/van

I provided this: http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/

And now this: http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/pressac/technique-and-operation/

Start reading.

Edit: Whoopsie, looking back through the thread for what ANTPogo meant by 3 links he'd provided, thinking he could not have meant in addition to the 2 from HDOT the Wiki article on the obscure Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler (http://books.google.com/books?id=GB...onepage&q=longerich "heinrich himmler&f=false), I found that ANTPogo had previously linked to Pressac's study of the Birkenau gas chambers. By popular demand, as it were, and because it conforms to his stated interest so well, SnakeTongue should start with that link.
 
Last edited:
What great work of assumptions you do.
No, what I stated was not an assumption but fact. Knowing something about this, like who Himmler was and what language he spoke and what he said at Posen, and knowing what evidence exists, I know that you will not be able to learn what you say you want to learn by the method you say you want to use.

It is that simple.
 
SnakeTongue said:
No, you do not have to prove anything. You just did not provided a footage of a gas chamber being used to kill people.

Wow, a holocaust denier in denial mode, that's hardly surprising.

I presented you with a video, which showed how people were let into a building, that was about to be filled with the fumes of two cars. THIS is exactly what you wanted, and just saying "no" was never in the history of humanity an argument.

SnakeTongue said:
I did not claimed anything. You are doing imaginary assumptions.

I misunderstood this part from you:
SnakeTongue said:
What you provide was a video of a constructed experiment inside a museum.

But it doesn't matter, since even if this was just an experiment, it proves, that people were gassed by the nazis, period. Or do you wanna tell me, that the carbon monoxide in the fumes is completly harmless for these people?

SnakeTongue said:
So, where is a footage of a real homicidal gas chamber? I do not want one which you think is "about to being filled with the fumes of two cars". I want one showing the whole operation of a homicidal gas chamber.

It was presented to you and again, you are just moving the goalpost. Now suddenly just a video is not enough anymore, now it has to be a video of the whole operation and if we had that, it would have to be a colored video with 5.1 sound and a full HD resolution. Nobody here falls for this kind of crap, again, this is sceptics forum.

And I don't just "think", that this chamber is about to being filled with fumes, you can see the pipes from the cars going through the wall of that room, which is about to be filled with people.

What a coincide, gassing by the fumes of engines, exactly what all the evil jews AND nazis from Chelmno, Treblinka, Sobibor and Belzec said. But that doesn't bother you.
 
So far, I found a testimony from Joseph G. Burg which which refute the argument about the supposed mass extermination performed by the Germans during the second world war.

The 1988 'Holocaust' Testimony Of Joseph Burg

In view of this testimony, I did not find one single piece of evidence (no document, film or picture) which directly prove so far the existence of any intention by the Germans to exterminate a group of people:

In his books, Burg dealt with the subject of the alleged Nazi extermination camps. Burg had spoken to hundreds of people who had been in Auschwitz and had visited the camp in the fall of 1945. Burg had wanted to see the crematoria, the hospitals, and in particular, a large new bakery. He also wanted to find the gas chambers although at that time gassings were not yet in fashion. He did not find any gas chambers. Burg formed the opinion that there were no "extermination" camps at all, that gas chambers had never existed and that there had been no plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe. These opinions were published in his books and in his correspondence with Zündel. (25-6825 to 6838)

There is a man which visited the supposed "death" camps soon after the end the war. That man never spot one single homicidal gas chamber, the main argument used to prove the so called "holocaust". In view of this fact, it is reasonable to understand why no one can provide a single piece of direct evidence to prove the existence of gas chambers or a German master plan to exterminate people.

After the war, Burg heard a lot about the allegations that people were gassed at Auschwitz and Majdanek. He proved that it was either out of stupidity or propaganda. Up to now, he pointed out, no document had been found showing who gave the order for gassings, who built them and where they were built. The German authorities especially had been called the "super-bureaucracis." It therefore couldn't be that after all these years not a document could be found. (25 6840)

Burg testified that he spoke to hundreds of people who serviced and operated the crematoria but the people who operated gas chambers were impossible to find. Nobody had published anything in which it was claimed that he worked in a gassing institution for human beings. There was literature about gassing that was completely contradictory. Why? Because it was all made up. These opinions were published in his books. (25-6840)

The above excerpt reinforce the fact: not one single document exist to prove the existence of a plan of mass extermination.

The German Reich wanted to get the Jews out: how and where were secondary questions. The people under Göring dealing with the Jewish question picked up a plan which came from the founder of the Zionist movement, Theodor Herzl, which involved moving the Jews to Uganda or Madagascar. Both of these colonies belonged to France. The plan did not work out, but the existence of the plan alone proved logically that a liquidation of the Jews did not exist. Their labour was needed as well. Burg emphasized there was no liquidation of the Jews by the Germans. (25-6842, 6843, 6844)

The Transfer (Haavara) Agreement of 1933 was one of the most important incidents in the Holocaust framework. Under this agreement some 2.5 million Jews were to be traded for trucks. The agreement never came to fruition because the Zionists could not take that number of Jews to Palestine. (25-6853, 6854)

(...)

In the early 1930s, as result of this co-operation between the Nazis and Zionists, some 120,000 Jews emigrated from Germany to Palestine. Difficulties began, however, when Britain, which administered Palestine, refused to issue any more immigration permits because of Arab unrest. (26-6879, 6880)

It start to appear the original "final solution" was outcast the Jew people from German, a idea supported by the Zionist movement inside German!

The Zionists were happy with this arrangement. An appointed Jewish Council was the governing body of the ghetto. They had their own police, jails and everything else. Naturally, there were some who were cruel. One of these was the vice president of the police, who was later executed. In Burg's eyes, this execution was evidence that Jews defended themselves against the minority of Zionists who were using the majority of Jews for their own purposes. (26-6886, 6887)

In the Lodz ghetto there was a Jewish police force, a Jewish bank, Jewish money, a Jewish post office, stamps only for Jews. There were workshops for Jews. If there was a German plan to liquidate the Jews, why were there workshops?, asked Burg. Why those expenses? Why train children for jobs? Thanks to Berlin, Burg testified, the Jews practiced a small Israel. These things could not be said today, however, because it was now said that there was a "Holocaust" and the Jews were murdered. (26-6888, 6889)

Wait? The Jewish ghetto have their own police? Bank? Currency? Post office? All supported by the Third Reich?

Where is the mass extermination plan?

So, I raise the question again:

Where I can find evidence which directly proves a plan of mass extermination?
 
Last edited:
How about you google the Posen speech?

And would you please answer my question why you assume there would be pictures or footage of the gassings?
 
Last edited:
And so, despite the links I gave you, the thing you found compelling and convicing was an article on a conspiraloon website, written by someone who had literally been a Holocaust denier for decades at the time he wrote this about saucer-Nazi fan and fellow denier Ernst Zundel's trial, and passed on by Ernst Zundel's own wife? Without even a single indication that you even looked at, much less actually read, the actual evidence in the links I provided to you, especially the exhaustive Pressac reference which delved deep into the gas chamber issue?

Color me shocked. Shocked, I say.
 
Last edited:
There is no "both sides". There is history and there is the loons. Do you look at "both sides" of the creationism-evolution "dispute"? Do you look at "both sides" in the "moon landing hoax dispute"? Do you think a handful of ideologues and liars constitute a "side"?

You type like a fanatical religious person, which insist that his holy book is the only right.

The deity: supposed exterminated Jews

The religion: Holocaust

The holy book: countless misinterpreted evidence

The sin: dare to question the holy word and the existence of the deity

The evil enemy: the revisionists, vulgarly called "deniers"

The holy land: Auschwitz-Birkenau camp

That only reinforce the credibility of people like Robert Faurisson:

Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism



(...)

“The Holocaust” of the Jews then became a sort of religion whose three main components are the extermination, the gas chambers and the six million martyrs. According to an article of faith of this religion Hitler ordered and planned the methodical slaughter of all European Jews; in so doing he committed a crime without precedent, a specific crime, later called genocide. Then, in order to commit this specific crime, he had a specific weapon developed, a weapon of mass destruction, the gas chamber, operating especially with a powerful insecticide, Zyklon B, whose active ingredient was hydrogen cyanide. Finally, the result of this enormous crime was the death of six million European Jews.
 
And so, despite the links I gave you, the thing you found compelling and convicing was an article on a conspiraloon website, written by someone who had literally been a Holocaust denier for decades at the time he wrote this about saucer-Nazi fan and fellow denier Ernst Zundel's trial, and passed on by Ernst Zundel's own wife? Without even a single indication that you even looked at, much less actually read, the actual evidence in the links I provided to you, especially the exhaustive Pressac reference which delved deep into the gas chamber issue?

Color me shocked. Shocked, I say.

I read many articles, including the one from Pressac. I also verified documents and the forensic data.

I am really sorry, but the testimony of Joseph Burg destroyed all articles and evidence which I verified.

I also watched a testimony from Dina Gottliebova-Babbittm, which proves there were cultural activities in the concentration camps.

The overwhelming evidence which discredit the existence of a mass extermination cannot be ignored.
 
Last edited:
I read many articles, including the one from Pressac.

You may have read many articles, but they were apparently all written by deniers (Faurisson? Really?). You certainly didn't read Pressac. Not in less than 24 hours while also claiming to have read a bunch of other articles.

I also verified documents and the forensic data.

Uh huh. And what documents and forensic data did you "verify", and how exactly didyou manage to "verify" them?

I am really sorry, but the testimony of Joseph Burg destroyed all articles and evidence which I verified.

Since you didn't actually "verify" anything, that must have been easy.

I also watched a testimony from Dina Gottliebova-Babbittm, which proves there were cultural activities in the concentration camps.

I can't even figure out what you're trying to argue with this.

The overwhelming evidence which discredit the existence of a mass extermination cannot be ignored.

I personally have found it very easy to ignore things that don't exist. Like "evidence which discredit the existence of a mass extermination", for instance.
 
And I see it took you barely a day to go from "I'm just looking for evidence and documents about the gas chambers" and "Himmler? Who's that? He gave a speech, you say? Was it in English?" to "Revisionists are being attacked and insulted because they dare to question the nonexistent evidence for the Holy Truth of the Holocaust!" and linking to Faurisson's blog.
 
Obvious denier ploy is obvious. And why the nazis would record their crimes on photographies or films is apparently a hard question to answer.
 
Last edited:
the people who operated gas chambers were impossible to find. Nobody had published anything in which it was claimed that he worked in a gassing institution for human beings.
Try again: http://books.google.com/books?id=Ip...wAA#v=onepage&q=we wept without tears&f=false

http://books.google.com/books/about/Eyewitness_Auschwitz.html?id=ENAPlezFF_AC or http://www.archive.org/details/eyewitnessauschw00ml

Your remarks are all very common and ordinary to those of us who are familiar with denial, and so is your strategy. That is why - and of course you know this - your points are greeted as the old gambits they are.
 
Anti-semitic Troll is Anti-Semitic....



To deny the Holocaust is to be as dumb as box of hammers....... Seriously, there are Klansmen who think you are barking up the wrong tree.
 
Wait? The Jewish ghetto have their own police? Bank? Currency? Post office? All supported by the Third Reich?
Yes, Jewish police force, in Lodz called the Ordnungsdienst (OD, or Order Service), which was established in the ghetto on 1 March 1940 at the direction of the city of Lodz's police chief, who operated under the command of the German occupiers. The Jewish police force was unarmed and helped the Germans keep order in the ghetto as well as being used to help in roundups and deportations of the ghetto's inmates - at such times the Order Service operated under Gestapo orders. An order of the Lodz police in April 1940 required that the Jewish police be responsible for the "surveillance of the ghetto's enclosure," with the stipulation that breaches would result in punishment for the "responsible leader of the Jewish Order Service."

The post office in Lodz ghetto was more or less similar - mail service regulated by the German Post Office in Lodz. Service was subject to German control, and it was often totally disrupted. Food parcels sent to ghetto inmates were intercepted beginning in June 1940; mailing of goods from the ghetto was prohibited (except for old clothing). Outgoing mail was censored.

Of course, these matters are well known and not only don't challenge the evidence for German mass extermination actions but are part and parcel of such actions, as the Germans required the Order Service in particular to play a part in these actions.

The best source, IMHO, for Lodz institutions mentioned by this denier is Isaiah Trunk, Lodz Ghetto: A History. Trunk's book reproduces many documents of the Nazis and the ghetto's Jewish Council. Another good secondary book on Lodz is Gordon Horwitz's Gettostadt: Lodz and the Making of a Nazi City. This denier will not read Trunk's work, of course, or Horwitz's, being too busy with recycling dishonest materials he's found on the Web and pretends to be surprised by.
 
Last edited:
So after a vigorous five second search of the internet I locate Himmler's recording and inform SnakeTongue....who unfortunately doesn't know who Himmler is.

Here it is....( It seems you haven't even looked at the internet either)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a_cmbi3iIg

Obscure Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler (http://books.google.com/books?id=GB...onepage&q=longerich "heinrich himmler&f=false)

Here it is....( It seems you haven't even looked at the internet either)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a_cmbi3iIg

No, what I stated was not an assumption but fact. Knowing something about this, like who Himmler was and what language he spoke and what he said at Posen, and knowing what evidence exists, I know that you will not be able to learn what you say you want to learn by the method you say you want to use.

It is that simple.

I read the Speech of Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler at Posen 4 October 1943 and I really enjoyed.

Amazing speech.

Thank you very much by the indication.
 
Last edited:
You may have read many articles, but they were apparently all written by deniers (Faurisson? Really?). You certainly didn't read Pressac. Not in less than 24 hours while also claiming to have read a bunch of other articles.

Uh huh. And what documents and forensic data did you "verify", and how exactly didyou manage to "verify" them?

Since you didn't actually "verify" anything, that must have been easy.

I can't even figure out what you're trying to argue with this.

I personally have found it very easy to ignore things that don't exist. Like "evidence which discredit the existence of a mass extermination", for instance.

You have being polite and providing good resources to me verify.

Now you are doing as the others, assumptions.

Do not discredit yourself.
 
Of course, these matters are well known and not only don't challenge the evidence for German mass extermination actions but are part and parcel of such actions, as the Germans required the Order Service in particular to play a part in these actions.

Part of?

Care to explain how that works? If the Germans wished to exterminate the Jews, why permit than to have they own bank system? Postal office? Workshops?

The Jews were not supposed to starve to death?

The best source, IMHO, for Lodz institutions mentioned by this denier is Isaiah Trunk, Lodz Ghetto: A History. Trunk's book reproduces many documents of the Nazis and the ghetto's Jewish Council. Another good secondary book on Lodz is Gordon Horwitz's Gettostadt: Lodz and the Making of a Nazi City. This denier will not read Trunk's work, of course, or Horwitz's, being too busy with recycling dishonest materials he's found on the Web and pretends to be surprised by.

Are you speaking with a mirror?
 
Because, it started off as an eliminating them from society. Segregation if you will. They still held that the jews held some value as forced labor for their war industry. Then a bit later, the final solution to the Jewish question was planned and off they went in a very germanic ,efficient manner.
 
You have being polite and providing good resources to me verify.

So do me the return courtesy and actually read them. Because you haven't. You especially haven't read Pressac.

And stop with this "verify" nonsense, because you aren't doing that, either.

Now you are doing as the others, assumptions.

I don't have to assume anything. Your own posts make your intentions more than clear.

Care to explain how that works? If the Germans wished to exterminate the Jews, why permit than to have they own bank system? Postal office? Workshops?

http://hdot.org/en/trial/defense/pl2

Are you speaking with a mirror?

All you have to do to prove him wrong is read the works he cited.
 
No, you do not have to prove anything. You just did not provided a footage of a gas chamber being used to kill people.



I did not claimed anything. You are doing imaginary assumptions.



I think you are stupid as much as you create assumptions about a person you do not really know.



Oh... Ironic.



Yes, I do.



So, where is a footage of a real homicidal gas chamber? I do not want one which you think is "about to being filled with the fumes of two cars". I want one showing the whole operation of a homicidal gas chamber.

You want snuff films?
 
Apparently he wants to watch films of people dieing.

In the light of his finding Himmler's first Posen speech "amazing" and that he "really enjoyed" it, his insistence on being shown film of actual gas chamber murders is seriously creepy, isn't it?
 
Part of. The Order Service, as stated in the post you quote from, was ordered to help in the roundups of Jews taken to Chelmno and later to Auschwitz. Yes, part of.

Care to explain how that works? If the Germans wished to exterminate the Jews, why permit than to have they own bank system? Postal office? Workshops?
Lodz was exceptional in being the longest-lasting ghetto and for its extensive workshops supplying the German military and industry; it was not, for example, part of the General Gouvernement where Aktion Reinhard was organized and carried out - but even in the GG some Jews were kept alive for forced labor, as you would be aware had you checked this thread as you were advised to do. Lodz itself was maintained as a working ghetto until its final liquidation. Still, approximately 70,000 Jews were deported from Lodz to Chelmno for execution in gas vans at the death camp in Kolo County during 1942; these were mostly ghetto inmates deemed by the occupying German authorities not to be capable of work and thus not worth keeping alive.

The Jews were not supposed to starve to death?
This question doesn't make any sense. I can say that in Lodz ghetto starvation and diseases related to malnutrition were rampant, and thus mortality was significantly higher than normal. However, at the same time, the authorities there wanted to keep Jews alive and productive. On occasion, observing that Jewish inmates would pass out at work in extreme cases or were lethargic and unproductive from malnourishment, Biebow's Ghettoverwaltung increased rations - minimally, for the purpose of maintaining labor productivity. A memo written by Rolf-Heinz Hoppner to Eichmann on 16 July 1941 expressed the situation thus: "There is an impression that District President Ubelhor does not wish to see the ghetto in Lodz disappear since he seems to profit quite well from it."

This shouldn't be hard to understand - Greiser's policy in the Warthegau was to clear out and murder much of the outlying population, to concentrate a Jewish workforce in Lodz ghetto held there by force and kept in poverty to produce economically useful goods, and finally to murder Lodz Jews judged incapable of work. In fact, Ubelhor's September 1939 confidential memo on the "Establishment of a Ghetto in the City of Lodz" explained the plan for the Lodz ghetto at the outset, "It is obvious that the establishment of the ghetto is only a transitional measure. I reserve for myself the decision as to when and how the city of Lodz will be cleansed of Jews. In any case, the final aim must be to burn out entirely this pestilent abscess." At that time, in 1939, the mass murder of Lodz's Jews was not being planned. Eventually, however, in 1942 those not able to render productive service to the occupying Germans were murdered en masse and finally, in 1944, all the remaining Lodz Jews were "burnt out" - as nearly all Lodz Jews left in the ghetto in summer 1944 were shipped for death to either Chelmno or Birkenau at that time - about 55,000 being sent to death camps and only 1400 kept alive for various labor assignments.

Are you speaking with a mirror?
I see you are neither knowledgeable nor clever; you compensate for this by being repetitive. It is a poor tradeoff, IMHO.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by LemmyCaution View Post
Obscure Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler (http://books.google.com/books?id=GBQ...immler&f=false)

Here it is....( It seems you haven't even looked at the internet either)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a_cmbi3iIg
You combined this post from Matthew Ellard http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8117982&postcount=10027 and this one from me http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8119610&postcount=10051 to create a fictitious post which you claim I wrote. Please don't do this again.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom