View Single Post
Old 14th May 2012, 08:59 AM   #705
joobz's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 17,998
Originally Posted by punshhh View Post
I think I should point out that naturalism is a movable feast. It shadows the movements in science.

GIBHOR, it is pointless to argue against the conclusions of naturalism. It is not clearly defined and will just fire scientific facts back at you.
Correct. Naturalism adjusts it's principles to fit with the observed data.
It's a god of the facts world view.
What's the best argument for UHC? This argument against UHC.
"Perhaps one reason per capita GDP is lower in UHC countries is because they've tried to prevent this important function [bankrupting the sick] and thus carry forward considerable economic dead wood?"-BeAChooser
joobz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top