Originally Posted by BasqueArch
You have no accurate way of knowing what occurred internally.
By all means apply "better math" to the data. I'd be more than curious to see the results.
Why do folk here have such short attention span/memory ?
The NW corner was in motion long before release...
You quoted that image less than four HOURS ago.
Again, it's amplified noise. It can maybe be reduced slightly but it's not going away with data taken from the Dan Rather footage. As you can see above, noise levels in the Cam#3 data are much reduced.
I know of no way to extract higher fidelity data. The techniques were refined over a period of about 18 months. Anyone wanting to give it a whirl is more than welcome.
It is moving.
Use Cam#3 graphs if you're interested in displacement. Use Dan Rather graphs if you're interested in acceleration. Dan Rather data is noisier than Cam#3 data. Nothing to do with the data extraction method or data treatment, simply video quality. And, yes, I have the highest quality Dan Rather footage I can lay my hands on.