View Single Post
Old 29th June 2012, 05:49 PM   #5693
femr2
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,859
Originally Posted by Christopher7 View Post
in an attempt to claim that NIST and Chandler don't know what they are talking about when they said WTC 7 fell at free fall for ~100'.
Here's Chandler's "re-done" WTC7 velocity plot...



In your own words, please explain how the **** you get from that remarkably non-linear (aka wiggly) line, which, of course you understand cannot imply a constant acceleration, "FFA" or not, to saying "indistinguishable from freefall" ?

Quote:
Chandler said "indistinguishable from free fall acceleration"
Correct. He really shouldn't have, should he.
femr2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top