...And after all that, you can't do me even the most basic courtesy of accepting that I actually might believe what I say? Even if you are sure I'm wrong?
There are some anomalies that are simply too clear to obfuscate and you maintain they aren't anomalies.
In other words, the answer is "No, I will not accept that you mean anything you say."
The tip of Collins' jacket corner is not being held down by the bottle on his chest...
I haven't, as far as I recall, said anything about Collins' jacket corner, nor have I followed the argument. There are plenty of people arguing with you about it already.
... Why is that - in your original words, without links to your canned responses?...
..., you completely disregarded my request for an original answer without any links to your canned replies. Are you at all capable of an original answer?
In other words, the answer is "no".
There is a point at which things are so clear that sophistry becomes ineffective and those two anomalies are well beyond that point. Normal intelligent objective people simply know that footage was faked as soon as they see it.
In other words, people are honest if they agree with your interpretations, and are liars if they do not.
I don't care. I'm not Jay Windley.
It's better to duck the issue and try to bury it deep in the thread to at least reduce the number of people who see it and then go on as if nothing had happened.
In other words, "you keep trying to bury my links", even though
I repeat your Great Wall of Links constantly.
You also maintain that the Chinese spacwalk was real which totally discredits all of you (see post #8506)...
Post 8506 has nothing to do with
what I said, which was that the ISS spacewalks looked nothing like underwater EVA training. It's bad enough that you keep calling me a liar, without any evidence whatsoever, at least please stop misrepresenting what I say. (By the way, as noted I have actually seen underwater astronaut training facilities and training in person. How about you?)
I keep telling you what I think of your poll and the fact that there are about twenty posters here who don't agree with me.
First, I have no idea where you've stated such a number, but if you would care to cite a specific post where you have done so, and provide the means by which you calculated such a number, that would be helpful.
Second, yes, you keep insisting that almost all of the respondents are sock-puppets, and that all who are against you are liars; but since you haven't provided any evidence whatsoever for either one, the poll results stand. Last time I checked, it was about 295-1 against you. Stop whining about it; you
asked for it.
You know I'm not going to risk getting banned by clearly stating what I think is going on here on this thead so you'll just have to infer what I think from the above as I'm taking a risk just by posting that; I don't dare go beyond that and you know it.
Spare us the breathless adolescent melodrama. You aren't taking any risks at all, Mr. Safely Anonymous Somewhere on the Internet. You keep saying everyone who doesn't agree with you is a liar, and you keep spamming your links - hell, I even spam them
for you as well - and you're still able to keep repeating yourself.
You people keep repeating this because you know my sincere answer might get me banned. I won't say it directly. I'll post this and you can try to infer my answer from it.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums...
Glass houses, rocky -
you fit the "disinformation agent" profile very nicely. But unlike you, I have the common decency to actually accept that you mean what you say, no matter how wrong I think you are.
Here is what I observe from your answer, or rather your failure to answer:
1. You are a boor. You will not even extend to me the same courtesy I extend to you. You refuse to even accept the possibility that I might simply be
wrong; instead, you insist I am a liar without any evidence whatsoever.
2. You clearly are
not capable of an original answer, and you cannot answer without endlessly spamming your links. I suspect you may, in fact, not even be an actual human being but rather a computer program. Or perhaps you're autistic. Or perhaps you're just too lazy and rude.
3. You are a hypocrite. You rail endlessly against the Powers That Be and their tools of oppression, but the bedrock of your argument is that pernicious tool of oppression, the loyalty test:
If you don't agree with my views, you are a liar. Shame on you.
4. You are disingenuous and ungrateful; you constantly whine about how I try to bury your poor links, even though I constantly repeat them for you, and you can't even cough up a word of thanks for this free service.
My courtesy to you ends at this point; you have abused it long enough.
Some people might be embarrassed by such a sorry record, but I do not believe you're capable of being embarrassed. So, at this point, I have only one question left for you:
You've previously said you live in Madrid. So you're not at all far from Fresnedillas, right?
