You people are putting forth the idea that I should study more of the official version of the nature and levels of space radiation before I talk about it.
No, I am pointing out that you know nothing at all about it, but reject the advice of people who actually
do know something about it because of your absolutely rigid ideological belief.
In fact, you
must believe, reflexively and without evidence, that anyone who contradicts you is lying. This includes pretty much the entire space science, engineering, and operations community who, because of your desperate need to avoid considering that
you might be wrong, must
all be lying; millions of people over generations all lying and conspiring to hide the truth from DavidC the Brave Anonymous Internet Warrior for Truth.
The theory is that the info you say I should study is bogus.
Wrong.
As already explained, you do not have a "theory". You have an unsupported belief.
There is alternative info that contradicts the official data.
There is "alternative info" that contradicts the official claim that the world is round; that contradicts the official claim that the Earth revolves about the Sun; that contradicts the official claim that if you do not ingest nutrition, you will eventually get sick and die. All of these are exactly as valid as your "alternative info". Unlike you, I do knot merely regurgitate random third-party web sites that support my belief; I actually have the relevant education and work experience to evaluate them.
Your "alternative info" is laughably silly to those with education and experience in the subject. Again, I ask:
What relevant education and work experience do you have? If you have none, why do you blindly accept the word of unqualified persons with no accountability for their claims?
The only people who can be sure of the true nature and levels of space radiation are people with high security clearances.
Wrong.
As already explained, this is manifestly untrue. Commercial and civil spacecraft are largely designed, built, and operated by people
without security clearances. I have been there and done that. You have no idea what you are talking about.
The rest of us have no way of knowing what the levels are.
This, too, is manifestly wrong. Many scientists, students, and amateurs (like KA9Q) have hands-on, non-NASA experience with space radiation effects. Please stop pretending this has not been explained to you already.
Moreover, any interested layman can learn enough about the subject to really get a good understanding for it. Please do not ascribe
your laziness and determined ignorance to everyone else.
The government lies about so many other things, so why should we just believe their info on space radiation?
Because the
public data used by every spacefaring country, every spacecraft designer, manufacturer, operator, and insurer
worldwide is consistent with it, and if your fantasy were correct said spacecraft would routinely die prematurely and inexplicably. This, too, has been carefully explained to you. Please stop pretending otherwise.
No. I and others have looked at your regurgitated web sites, here and elsewhere, and responded to them. Collectively, they are a cautionary tale of grade-school physics fail.
Now it's
your turn, you lazy hypocrite: you reflexively deny the explanations, or pretend they never happened, and then refuse to consider sources backed by actual practice, with real-world accountability. No more hiding:
Describe, in your own words, what exactly is wrong with the science and engineering a small sample of which I've already provided to you. No hypocritical loyalty tests. No cherry-picking quotes. No appeals to equal ignorance. Use your own words, and state your assumptions, and
show your work.
Oh, and one other thing:
You said you live in Madrid, so you must not be far at all from Fresnedillas, right?
