Heiwa drummed out of AE911T?

tfk said:

Wow, how bad do you have to go from "Petitioner of the Month" to "hit the road, Jack" by AE911t?

It appears that Anders has been shown the door at Gage's group.

Disclosure: I say "appears" because I have no idea where or when this happened.

However I see no reason to believe that this was initiated by Bjorkman. I suspect that Anders own nonsense at his Tripod site (i.e., all photos & videos showing planes impacting towers are fake, a-bombs don't work & shuttle flights, Mars landers & Apollo missions are all NASA hoaxes) was too much even for Gage.

Click to expand...

Anders Björkman said:

http://www.phpbbserver.com/stj911/viewtopic.php?t=696&mforum=stj911

There is too little potential energy in the 'mass above' of the WTCs to overcome the strain energy of the structure below to cause any collapse of any kind as suggested by NIST. This is basic structural damage analysis!

Click to expand...

Mar 18, 2010
What did and did not Cause Collapse of
WTC Twin Towers in New York
— Anders Bjorkman

The below Discussion to Paper was submitted to ASCE - Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 3 February 2009 and approved for publication 3 June 2009, apparently awaiting a reply or Closure by Messrs. Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson, that has not come forward 15 December 2009.The illustrations, figures 1-8 did not form part of the original submission to ASCE-JEM but are added here for easy verification of observations. As ASCE/JEM are delaying publication, I have decided to publish it here today. Comments are always welcome at anders.bjorkman@wanadoo.fr

Discussion to Paper (3 February, 2009 - final 3 June, 2009)

(Also as Power Point presentation + nice figures)

Discussion of "What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York" by Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 134 (2008), [1]

I have read subject article by Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson (BLGB) with great interest and would like to make the following observations:

There is no need to describe the destruction of WTC1 using differential equations. Simple math + observations of videos prove the BLGB model and paper wrong.

BLGB suggests that upper part C (of WTC1) drops on the lower structure of WTC1 - part A - that is one-way crushed in 97 steps until ground.
[A-B-C Graphic]
read more...

Click to expand...

... It’s “a gradual process,” agrees Anders Björkman, and “cannot be simultaneous everywhere.” A Swedish naval architect working in France, Björkman maintains that failures “will always be local and topple the mass above in the direction of the local collapse.”

Click to expand...

• WTC 1 - The Case for Collapse Arrest
Anders Bjorkman - Apr 19, 2008

Click to expand...

WTC Collapse Analysis by Anders Björkman — [ http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist.htm ]

Click to expand...

Anders Björkman
Naval architect & Marine
engineer
M.Sc.
Beausoleil, Alpes Maritime –
France

Click to expand...

ozeco41 said:

They reject those who go too far into woo AND definitely eject anyone inside who dares to push for honest investigation and honest statements.

Click to expand...