View Single Post
Old 3rd March 2013, 10:08 AM   #19
TubbaBlubba
Knave of the Dudes
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 11,423
Originally Posted by Louigi Verona View Post
I don't think Randi's statement was scientific, meaning - it was not meant to be a statement about science. At least, this is not the way I read it.
I'm sorry, but this wriggling is inane. Randi incorrectly characterized an important scientific theory in order to support a stupid idea he had. If he didn't mean to say that evolution supported his solution, why the hell did he refer to not only natural selection or SotF, but Darwin himself?!
__________________
"The presidentís voracious sexual appetite is the elephant that the president rides around on each and every day while pretending that it doesnít exist." - Bill O'Reilly et al., Killing Kennedy
TubbaBlubba is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top