View Single Post
Old 25th July 2019, 12:13 PM   #173
caveman1917
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,734
Originally Posted by Belz... View Post
No, no. Your claim, your proof. Quote the relevant parts. Your claim has already been rejected; only you can rehabilitate it.
What you mean is: it's been rejected by you, but I don't see why I should care much about that.

Quote:
I have never said this. You should pay closer attention to what I write.
Well then, having established that it's possible to organize this without involving danger to the children, then why aren't schools doing this?

Quote:
Do you seriously expect me to do the legwork of every prick who comes in here with a claim about science, politics or magic? Get out of here.
Not at all, you are more than free to reject my claim. Just as I am more than free not to care about your rejection of it.

Quote:
But where are you going with this? Liberals and conservatives are biased towards their ideologies but marxists aren't as much? You'll have a hard time finding a study that shows this. Good luck.
No, liberals - and to a slightly lesser extent conservatives - are more prone to approach a subject from a perspective of moral virtuousness rather than a perspective of factual analysis, as they are looking to pass moral judgement rather than analysis. Specifically, they are more prone to reject a claim based on the moral standing of the person making it rather than its actual factual (in)accuracy.
__________________
"Ideas are also weapons." - Subcomandante Marcos
"We must devastate the avenues where the wealthy live." - Lucy Parsons
"Let us therefore trust the eternal Spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unfathomable and eternal source of all life. The passion for destruction is a creative passion, too!" - Mikhail Bakunin
caveman1917 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top