Originally Posted by
marplots
I feel enough pages have passed that I can repeat myself.
I have seen many excellent critiques of the AA methodology and evidence to make the case that AA is religious/faith-based in nature.
BUT, as the OP asks, "Why do they insist it isn't religious?"
I guess that means that enough pages have passed that I can also repeat a question I asked earlier: Why do JREFers (James Randi in particular) insist that the JREF is not an atheist organization?