Originally Posted by
eerok
Now that you mention it, I'd like to know more about the group that Chris goes out with when he observes bigfoot. I think that if he really thinks he's seeing bigfoot, then someone in the chain of knowledge of this group's activities is hoaxing the group. I'm not saying this is Chris himself who's doing the hoaxing, but if he really thinks he's seeing bigfoot, he could very likely be a victim of hoaxing.
If one eliminates the hoaxes, pranks, jokes, misperceptions, social distortions, and mental illness from bigfoot sightings, there are none left that qualify as objective and verifiable evidence.
It is a stone cold fact that there's not a single bigfoot sighting that has led to anything close to unambiguous evidence that could possibly establish that bigfoot actually exists.
So I want to know who's fooling who in Chris's sightings.
Good point. Bigfooters always try to claim that other animals are known to indigenous people, are sighted, but are unknown to science for a period of time. While this is true, it ignores the true comparison. How many of these animals, before being formally "discovered", were seen in virtually all 48 contiguous states, have groups
specifically looking for them, yet leave absolutely no physical evidence?