Originally Posted by
Gilbert Syndrome
My main issue is with Chris,' supposedly, sole purpose in coming here: a "rebuttal to Munns' presentation." He's had it tenfold
I agree. I was looking for a counter presentation on specific points of Bill's presentation. But as you know most here either saw no movement of the two frames being discussed or simply posted negative opinions about Bill Munns and or attacked me personally instead of having a civilized discussion of the topic.