PACAL: Here ya go.
http://www.crimearchives.net/1979_ma...136-doc057.pdf
In addition to the fact that ALL of inmate's evidentiary claims have prosaic explanations, his advocates don't seem to have the ability to keep up with current information on this case. Prime example from one of the Landlord's regurgitated lists.
"For example, A brown hair, with root intact, was found under Kimberly's bloody fingernail. This hair did not match MacDonald."
COMMENTS: This evidentiary item was a 7mm hair fragment that was found in Kimberley's fingernail scrapings. The only hairs that can be compared under a microscope are head and pubic hairs, so it was impossible to exclude inmate as the source of that hair fragment. In late 1999, FBI hair and fiber expert Robert Fram analyzed the hair fragment and determined that it was animal hair. Case closed.
http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com